Feedback in peer revew: an experience in Mathematics degree
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10197Keywords:
Rating; Peer revew; Mathematics Education; Feedback; Teaching.Abstract
This article aims to reveal the role of feedback in peer review based on the development of activities carried out with undergraduate students, in three subjects of a Mathematics Degree Course. Theoretically, this research was supported by theories related to formative evaluation, peer evaluation and feedback. Methodologically, it is a qualitative-exploratory research, whose data were collected through an electronic questionnaire (Google forms), with twelve students who attended the subjects of Mathematics Education Seminars, Mathematics Teaching Practice I and II. This questionnaire was collected eight months after the end of the courses. Among the results achieved, it can be detach that there are signs that evidence the occurrence of a formative evaluation; students were able to identify and analyze what was learned and what still needed to be improved; the focus of the evaluation was to promote learning; feedback can help students to regulate their learning; especially when performed orally, by everyone, immediately after work and in writing, by the teacher.
References
Barlow, M. (2006). Avaliação escolar: mitos e realidades. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Gil, A. C. (2010). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5° Ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Hadji, C. (1994). A avaliação regras do jogo: das intenções aos instrumentos. 4. ed. Porto: Ed. Porto.
Levin-Peled, R., & Kali, Y., & Dori, Y.J. (2007). Promoting collaborative learning in higher education: Design principles for hybrid courses. International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 8a., 2007, New Jersey. CSCL’07 Proceedings.
Mesquita, R., & Duarte, F. (1996). Dicionário de psicologia. Lisboa: Plátano.
Mussi, R.F.F, & Mussi, L. M. P. T., & Assunção, E. T. C., & Nunes, C. P. (2019). Pesquisa Quantitativa e/ou qualitativa: distanciamentos, aproximações e possibilidades. Revista Sustinere, Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 7, p. 414-430, jul./dez. Recuperado de: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/sustinere/article/view/41193
Nicol, D. (2010). The foundation for graduate attributes: Developing self-regulation through self and peer assessment. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Scotland. Recuperado de: https://www.reap.ac.uk/Portals/101/Documents/PEER/Project/QAA_GA_SR.pdf
Nicol, D. (2011). Developing students' ability to construct feedback. QAA Scotland, Enhancement Themes. Recuperado de: https://www.reap.ac.uk/Portals/101/Documents/PEER/CaseForConstruction_DN.pdf
Nicol, D., & Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 39, n. 1, p. 102-122. Recuperado de: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
Passos, M. L. S. (2020). Feedback como parte Integrante da Avaliação Formativa em um Curso de Pós-graduação a Distância: Concepções da Equipe Multidisciplinar. Revista Brasileira de Aprendizagem Aberta e a Distância, v. 19, n. 1, p. 16-16.
Pereira, D. R., & Flores, M. A. (2012). Percepções dos estudantes universitários sobre a avaliação das aprendizagens: um estudo exploratório. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas), v. 17, n. 2, p. 529-556.
Pombo, L. M. T. (2014). Avaliação em contextos de blended learning no ensino superior. 2014. 180 f. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de Aveiro (Portugal).
Rosa, M., & Maltempi, M. V. (2006). A avaliação vista sob o aspecto da Educação a Distância. Ensaio: avaliação e políticas públicas em educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 14, n. 50. p. 57-76.
Rosa, S. S., & Macedo, C. A., & Geremias Jr, J. E. S., & Lisboa, E. S., & Souza, R. C.T., & Rosa, V. (2018). Online Peer Assessment: pontos e contrapontos na percepção de docentes e de estudantes. Anais do Workshop de Informática na Escola, p. 265-274. Recuperado de: https://www.br-ie.org/pub/index.php/wie/article/view/7895
Rosa, S. S., & Coutinho, C. P., & Flores, M. A. (2017). Online Peer Assessment no ensino superior: uma revisão sistemática da literatura em práticas educacionais. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, v. 22, n. 1, p. 55-83. doi: 10.1590/s1414-40772017000100004
Silva, J. de C. R., & Carvalho, C. F. de, & Almeida, C. M. de, & Freire S. (2019). Vozes dos alunos sobre feedback: Um estudo no ensino superior. Educar hoje: Diálogos entre psicologia, educação e currículo, p. 325-331.
Sousa, L. D., & Almeida, F. A. de, & Bard, L. A., & Cancela, L. B. (2018). Os desafios enfrentados pelos professores no processo de avaliação no ensino superior. Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional, v. 7, n. 16, p. 59-66.
Villas Boas, B. M. F. (2006). Avaliação formativa e formação de professores: ainda um desafio. Linhas Críticas, v. 12, n. 22, p. 159-179. doi:10.26512/lc.v12i22.3283
Villas Boas, B. M. F. (2003). Práticas avaliativas no contexto do trabalho pedagógico universitário: formação da cidadania crítica. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, v. 8, n. 4. p. 103-120. Recuperado de: http://periodicos.uniso.br/ojs/index.php/avaliacao/article/view/1248
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Adriana Quimentão Passos; Simone Luccas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
