The influences of the home office modality in informal conversations in organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10485Keywords:
Telecommuting; Work from home; Informal conversations; Informal communications; COVID-19 pandemic.Abstract
The goal of this study was to analyze the influence that working from home had on the informal conversations, during the COVID-19 pandemic, in organizations. By means of online asynchronous interviewing, 40 employees and professionals who, due to the pandemic, started working from home had their answers evaluated by content analysis. The results showed that the majority of participants started using digital communication and information technologies, such as remote communication apps and mobile devices, in order to have informal conversations. However, there was a decrease in the frequency of those conversations for many participants, and in some other cases, conversations ceased completely. Considering, on one hand, the positive effects of informal conversations on work and integration, and on the other, the possible increase of physical and social isolation caused by working from home during the pandemic, the results suggest potential negative impacts on the efficiency of the work performed, as well as on the quality of life and wellbeing on the work environment. From the theoretical perspective, the investigation aids the unveiling of the effects that working from home has on informal communications in intense physical and social isolation conditions. From a practical perspective, this comprehension can help organizations and their managers to consider the aspect of informal conversations when implementing their telecommuting processes. This implies the consideration of the adoption of practices which value direct interactions, such as business meetings and periodic informal face-to-face moments, as well as increasing the possibility of more significant online communications.
References
Aderaldo, I. L., Aderaldo, C. V. L., & Lima, A. C. (2017). Aspectos críticos do teletrabalho em uma companhia multinacional. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 15(spe), 511-533. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395160287
Baldissera, R. (2009). Comunicação Organizacional na perspectiva da complexidade. Organicom, 6(10/11), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2009.139013.
Barros, A. M., & Silva J. R. G. (2010). Percepções dos indivíduos sobre as consequências do teletrabalho na configuração home-office: estudo de caso na Shell Brasil. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 8(1), 71-91.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2002). Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
Costa, I. S. A. (2005). Controle em novas formas de trabalho: teletrabalhadores e o discurso do empreendimento de si. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512005000100009.
Coenen, M., & Kok, R. A.W. (2014) Workplace flexibility and new product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules. European Management Journal, 32(4), 564-576. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.003.
Dubrin, A. J. (2006). Fundamentos do comportamento organizacional. São Paulo: Pioneira.
Duterme, C. A. (2008). Comunicação Interna na Empresa. A abordagem de Palo Alto e a análise das organizações. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.
Ellison, N. B. (1999). Social impacts: New perspectives on telework. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), 338-356.
Eurofound, & the International Labour Office. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Geneva: The International Labour Office.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. (2020). A quarentena na COVID-19: orientações e estratégias de cuidado. Rio de Janeiro: Autores.
Fundação Instituto de Administração. (2020). Pesquisa de Gestão de Pessoas na Crise de Covid-19. São Paulo: Autores.
Flick, U. (2013). Introdução a metodologia de pesquisa. Porto alegre: Editora Penso.
Kraut, R. E., Fish, R. S., Root, R. W., Chalfonte, B. L. (1990). Informal communication in organizations: form, function and technology. In: S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds.). Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applies Social Psychology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Mann, S., Varey, R., & Button, W. (2000). An exploration of the emotional impact of tele‐working via computer‐mediated communication. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(7), 668-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010378054.
Mello, A. (1999). Teletrabalho (Telework): o trabalho em qualquer lugar e a qualquer hora. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Qualitymark.
Mello, A., Santos, S., Kuniyoshi, M., Gaspar, M., & Kubo, E. (2014). Teletrabalho Como Fator de Inclusão Social e Digital em Empresas de Call Center/Contact Center. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 7(3), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.5902/198346598794.
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nassar, P., & Figueiredo, R. (2012). O que é Comunicação Empresarial. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.
Newstrom, J. W., & Davis, K. (1997). Organizational Behavior: a Management Challenge. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.
Pérez, M. P., Sánchez, A.M., & Carnicer, M. P. L. (2002). Benefits and barriers of telework: perception differences of human resources managers according to company's operations strategy. Technovation, 22(12), 775-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00069-4.
Porto Digital. (2020). Impactos da COVID-19 no Porto Digital. (Relatório de Pesquisa/2020), Recife, PE, Porto Digital.
Rafalski, J. C., & Andrade, A. L. (2013). Trabalhando de casa: aspectos de relacionamento interpessoal e saúde de trabalhadores de Home-Office. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa do Relacionamento Interpessoal e Encontro Latino-Americano sobre Família e Relacionamento Interpessoal, Vitória, ES, Brasil, 3.
Rocha, C. T. M., & Amador, F. S. (2018). O teletrabalho: conceituação e questões para análise. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 16(1), 152-162.
Tomasi, C., & Medeiros, J. B. (2007). Comunicação Empresarial. São Paulo: Editora Atlas.
Tose, M. G. L. (2005). Teletrabalho: a prática do trabalho e a organização subjetiva dos seus agentes. Tese de doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of Work Life: what is it? Sloan Management Review, 15(1), 11-21.
Ward, N., & Shabba, G. (2001). Teleworking: an assessment of socio-psychological factors. MCB University Press, 19(1/2), 61-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Pedro Motta Ravacci Pires ; Mirian de Lourdes Noronha Motta Melo; Henrique Geraldo Rodrigues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
