Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis




Systematic review; Intellectual property; Protection of cultivars.


The establishment of adequate standards and principles for the application of norms for the protection of intellectual property rights over cultivars is a fundamental measure for any country, essentially Brazil, one of the richest countries in biodiversity in the world. Thus, the objective of this work was to carry out a systematic review to analyze the scientific production of protection of the main cultivars, to identify existing parameters and methods for the definition of royalty rates and the collection mechanisms adopted. A systematic review was carried out based on articles published in the period of 10 years, from 2009 to 2019, in the scientific bases Scopus and Web of Science. The Boolean terms and operators: “(royalty) and (plant variety or cultivars)” were explored in the title or summary of scientific articles. 83 documents indexed in the Scopus (37) and Web of Science (46) databases were searched. After processing the data and removing duplicate documents, 43 scientific articles remained. With an average publication of 6.7 publications per year. Average of 10 citations per document. A total of 171 authors and 271 co-authors, with five documents having single authorship and an average of 3.1 authors per article. Thus, a study sample of 17 articles was obtained. the journals analyzed did not provide information on how royalties are taxed, they only reported the type of protection and the cultivars studied.


Akhundjanov, S. B., Gallardo, R. K., McCluskey, J. J., & Rickard, B. J. (2020). Commercialization of a demand-enhancing innovation: The release of a new apple variety by a public university. Economic Modelling, 86(June 2019), 88–100.

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.

Arias, A. C. R., Palacio, J. L., Chaparro-Giraldo, A., & López-Pazos, S. A. (2017). Patents and genetically modified soybean for glyphosate resistance. World Patent Information, 48, 47–51.

Arnold, A. J. (2015). A Game-Theoretic Approach to Modelling Crop Royalties [University of Adelaide].

Bergadá, P., Rapela, M., Enríquez, R., Risso, D., & Mendizabal, J. (2016). Generating value in the soybean chain through royalty collection: an international study. BioSci Law Rev, 15(5), 169–210.

Boff, S. O. (2019). Proteção jurídica das cultivares na UPOV , no TRIPs e os limites na legislação brasileira : o embate entre interesse público e privado Legal Protection of Cultivars In UPOV , TRIPs between Public and Private Interest. XIX, 433–456.

BRASIL, Ministério da Indústria, Comércio Exterior e Serviços Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial. Resolução No 169, de 15 de Julho de 2016 (2016).

Bruch, K. L. (2006). Limites do Direito de Propriedade Industrial de Plantas. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Clunies-Ross, T. (1996). Creeping enclosure. Seed legislation, plant breeders’ rights and Scottish potatoes. Ecologist.

Correa, C. M. (2015). Plant Variety Protection in Developing Countries: A Tool for Designing a Sui Generis Plant Variety Protection Sistem: An Alternative to UPOV 1991.

Cunha, E. A. B. B. da. (2011). O direito sobre novas variedades. In Proteção de cultivares no Brasil.

Curtis, F., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Collection systems for royalties in wheat, an International study. Bio-Science Law Review, 12(6), 215.

De Jonge, B., & Munyi, P. (2016). A Differentiated Approach to Plant Variety Protection in Africa. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 19(1–2), 28–52.

FAO. (2021). Conservation of agrobiodiversity of local cultivars: millet, maize, sorghum through improved participatory for food and agriculture in Senegal. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Flister, L., & Galushko, V. (2016). The impact of wheat market liberalization on the seed industry’s innovative capacity: an assessment of Brazil’s experience. Agricultural and Food Economics, 4(1).

Giovanoli, S. M. (2014). Farm Saved Seed (FSS) and Royalty Generation for Wheat in France, United Kingdom, and Australia-Policy Implications for Canada. University of Saskatchewan.

Glenn, K. C., Alsop, B., Bell, E., Goley, M., Jenkinson, J., Liu, B., Martin, C., Parrott, W., Souder, C., Sparks, O., Urquhart, W., Ward, J. M., & Vicini, J. L. (2017). Bringing new plant varieties to market: Plant breeding and selection practices advance beneficial characteristics while minimizing unintended changes. In Crop Science (Vol. 57, Issue 6, pp. 2906–2921). Crop Science Society of America.

Gray, R. S., Kingwell, R. S., Galushko, V., & Bolek, K. (2017). Intellectual Property Rights and Canadian Wheat Breeding for the 21st Century. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(4), 667–691.

Hervouet, A., & Langinier, C. (2018). Plant breeders’ rights, patents, and incentives to innovate. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 43(1), 118–150.

Hurston, Z. N. (2019). International Overview on the Protection of Plant Varieties. Court Uncourt, 6.

Jong, P. De. (2020). Wine Law and Policy. Wine Law and Policy, 34(July 1998), 7–8.

Le Buanec, B., & Ricroch, A. (2014). Intellectual property protection of plant innovation. In Plant Biotechnology: Experience and Future Prospects (Vol. 9783319068923, pp. 59–73). Springer International Publishing.

Marques, F. (2017). Os limites do índice-h. Boletim Técnico do PPEC, 2(1), 35-39.

Monteiro, G. F. de A., & Zylbersztajn, D. (2013). Economic governance of property rights: Comparative analysis on the collection of royalties in genetically modified soybean seeds. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 51(1), 25–44.

Østerberg, J. T., Xiang, W., Olsen, L. I., Edenbrandt, A. K., Vedel, S. E., Christiansen, A., Landes, X., Andersen, M. M., Pagh, P., Sandøe, P., Nielsen, J., Christensen, S. B., Thorsen, B. J., Kappel, K., Gamborg, C., & Palmgren, M. (2017). Accelerating the Domestication of New Crops: Feasibility and Approaches. In Trends in Plant Science (Vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 373–384). Elsevier Ltd. (2021). QGIS Geographic Information System (3.4). QGIS Association.

R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation on Statistical Computing (1.3.1073).

RStudio Team. (2016). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. MA: RStudio.

Sakamoto, Cleusa Kazue & Silveira, Isabel Orestes. (2019). Como fazer projetos de Iniciação Científica. Pia Sociedade de São Paulo-Editora Paulus.

Shelton, A. C., & Tracy, W. F. (2017). Cultivar development in the U.S. public sector. Crop Science, 57(4), 1823–1835.

Wardikar, V. G., & Gudadhe, V. P. (2013). Application of Bradford’s law of scattering to the literature of library & information science: A study of doctoral theses citations submitted to the universities of Maharashtra, India. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2013.



How to Cite

SILVA, E. J. de S. .; SILVA-MANN, R. .; CALAZANS, C. C. . Royalty fees for cultivars, legislation and regulation: A meta-analysis. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. e31710414231, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14231. Disponível em: Acesso em: 26 mar. 2023.



Review Article