Artificial Intelligence and its impact on the construction of Law as norm of decision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.15361Keywords:
Artificial intelligence; Right; Decision standard.Abstract
The present manuscript aims to analyze the impact of artificial intelligence in the construction of Law as a decision rule. The dialogue between artificial intelligence and law, in this way, it is essential to investigate the definition of artificial intelligence, as well as conducting a thorough investigation of the decision-making process, using Friedrich Müller as a reference. In this perspective, this article, through explanatory research, of a qualitative nature, deductive method, collection of bibliographic and documentary data, developed in order to make considerations about cyberculture, especially with regard to intellectual technological support capable of providing answers for the various areas of human knowledge, making it more accessible, transparent and economical. Finally, it is concluded in view of the results that artificial intelligence, does not manage to produce cognitive abilities of high intelligences to materialize the decision standard along the lines of human intelligence, however, one can think about its influence in the light of models of patronized information by algorithms.
References
Bôas Filho, O. V. (2010). Tendências da análise antropológica do direito: algumas questões a partir da perspectiva francófona. Revista de Direito GV, São Paulo, v. 6, n. 1, p. 321-328, Jun./Jan.
Buest, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence is about machine reasoning or who machine learning is just a fancy plugin (CIO, 03 nov. 2017). Acesso em 24 outubro 2019, em https://www.cio.com/article/3236030/artificial-intelligence-is-about-machine-reasoning-or-when-machine-learning-is-just-a-fancy-plugin.html. Acesso em: 24 out. 2019.
Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Justiça em números. Acesso em 11 novembro 2020, em www.cnj.jus.br/pesquisas-judiciarias/justica-em-numeros/.
Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Política Nacional de tratamento adequado de conflitos. Resolução no. 125 de novembro de 2010. Acesso em 11 novembro 2019, em https://atos.cnj.jus.br/atos/detalhar/atos-normativos?documento=156.
Daniel, Sara. L´OBS. (2018). Intelligence artificielle: Karim Benyekhlef, l'homme qui "automatise" la justice. Acesso em 01 outubro 2019, em www.nouvelobs.com.
Ebiri, B. (2015). The 15 Best Robot Movies of All Time. Acesso em 01 outubro 2019, em www.vulture.com.
Gibney, E. (2017). Self-taught AI is best yet at strategy game Go. Disponível em:www.nature.com/news/self-taught-ai-is-best-yet-at-strategy-game-go-1.22858. Acesso em: 01 out 2019.
Haddad, M. P. (2018). Évasion fiscale : les comptes des Français sur les réseaux sociaux bientôt scrutés. TTL. Acesso em 10 outubro 2019, em www.rtl.fr.
Leiner, B. M. (1999). A brief history of the intenet . Disponível em: www.arxiv.org/html/cs/9901011. Acesso em: 07 de out. 2019.
Levy, P. (2011). La sphère sémantique. Computation, cognition, économie de l’información. Tome 1, Universitè du Ottawa, p. 63.130.
Mcevoy, M. (2019). Analysis: 2019 legal tech investments top $ 1B after stong Q3. Acesso em 23 janeiro 2021, em https://news.bloomberglaw.com.
Maia Filho, M. S., & Junquilho, T. A. (2019). Projeto Victor. Perspectivas de aplicação da inteligência artificial ao direito. Revista de Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais, Vitória, v. 19, n. 3, set./dez.
Mills, T. (2018). AI vs AGI: What’s the difference?. Acesso em 01 outubro 2019, em www.forbes.com.
Müller, F. Teoria estruturante do direito. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2008.
Müller, F. (1999). Métodos de trabalho do direito constitucional. Porto Alegre: Síntese.
Naughton, J. (2016). Even algorithms are biased against black men. Acesso em 01 novembro 2020, em www.theguardian.com.
Pereira, U. V., & Teixeira, T. (2019). Inteligência artificial. A quem atribuir responsabilidade? Revista de Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais, Vitória, v. 20, n. 2, mai/ago.
Privovarov, V. (2019). 713% Growth: Legal Tech set an investment record in 2018. Acesso em 01 outubro 2020, em www.forbes.com.
Rosa, C., & Spaler, M. (2019). Experiências privadas de ODR no Brasil. Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior de Advocacia da OAB-PR, ano 3, n. 3, dez.
Surden, H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and law. An overview. Georgia State Universty law Review, v. 35, issue 4, Summer.
Surden, H. (2014). Machining learning and law. Washington Law Review, v. 87.
Xerez, R., & Rocha, K. (2019). Análise jurídica da poliafetividade a partir do filme Eu Tu Eles. Anamorphosis RDL, v. 5, n. 1, jan.-jun.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Francisco Junior de Oliveira Marques; Rafael Marcílio Xerez; José Cândido da Silva Nóbrega
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
