Bryophytes in conservation units: A scientometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.16940Keywords:
Protected area; Hornworts; Mosses; Liverworts.Abstract
Conservation Units (CUs) are territorial spaces instituted by the government that have the purpose of conserving relevant natural characteristics. The Bryophytes, which in addition to constituting the flora of these areas, are more vulnerable to loss of environments than other terrestrial plants, in addition to this the fact that there is no collection of living material, and thus, can only be conserved by the preservation of natural areas. The objective was collect data on work with Bryophytes in CUs to complete the group's knowledge in protected areas, and also to detect possible lack of studies in different areas of Brazil. In the Web of Science ™ database, a search was performed using the descriptors, combined with the boolean operator AND arranged as follows: bryophytes AND protected area, bryophytes AND unit conservation, bryophytes AND national park, bryophytes AND state park. There were 119 articles published for different countries between the years 2010 to 2020. A large number of articles were concentrated in the years 2014 and 2016. England is the country that publishes the most on the topic and Brazil occupies second place. The search obtained the majority of the results concentrated in the Plant Science (35%), and Environmental Science (28%), among these, the areas most related to the topic addressed. This study draws attention to some gaps regarding the knowledge of bryophytes in CUs, highlighting the need for research with this plant group in some regions of Brazil, where several states in the Northeastern continue to be undersampled in relation to bryophyte. And reinforce the importance of choosing indexed journals in relevant databases, for greater visualization of researches.
References
Barros, F. S. M., Siqueira, M. F., & Costa, D. P. (2012). Modeling the potential geographic distribution of five species of Metzgeria Raddi in Brazil, aiming at their conservation. The Bryologist, 15 (2), 341-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-115.2.341
Camara, P. E. A. S., & Van Rooy, J. (2014). A new species of Sematophyllum (Sematophyllaceae) from South Africa and a key to the southern African species of the genus. Bryologist, 117 (3), 297-300. 10.1639 / 0007-2745-117.3.297
Capes (2020). Potal de Periódicos da Capes. https://www.periodicos.capes.gov.br/
Costa, F. B., Silva, E. O., & Conceição, G. M. (2015). Hepáticas (Marchantiophyta) e musgos (Bryophyta) da Área de Proteção Ambiental do Buriti do Meio, município de Caxias, Maranhão, Brasil, Scientia Plena 11 (1).
Costa, D. P., & Peralta, D. F. (2015). Bryophytes diversity in Brazil. Rodriguésia, 66 (4), 1063-1071. 2015. 10.1590 / 2175-7860201566409
Darosi, G. C. M., & Anderle, D. F. (2014). Mapeamento da Produção Científica Internacional sobre Inteligência de Estado. Espacios. 35 (5). http://www.revistaespacios.com/a14v35n05/14350405.html
Deheuvels., Rousseau, G. X., Quiroga, G. S., Franco, M. D., Cerda, R., Mendoza, S. J. V., Somarriba, E. (2014). Biodiversity is affected by changes in management intensity of cocoa-based agroforests. Agroforestry Systems, 8 (3), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9710-9 2014.
Flora do Brasil (2020) em construção. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. <http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB128472
Frahm, J. P. (2003). Diversity of bryophyte species on the tropics. In J.-P. Frahm (Ed.), Manual of Tropical Bryology, pp. 13-22. Tropical Bryology.
Glime, J. M. (2017). Introduction. Chapt. 1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredi r=1&article=1000&context=bryo-ecol-subchapters.
Goffinet, B., Buck, W. R., & Shaw, A. J. (2009). Morphology and Classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B. & Shaw, A.J. (eds.). Bryophyte Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 55-138.
Gradstein, S. R., Churchill, S. P., & Salazar-Allen, N. (2001). Guide to the bryophytes of Tropical America. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 86: 1-57.
Kaffer, M. I., Koch, N. M., Martins, S. M. D., & Vargas, V. M. F. (2016). Lichen community versus host tree bark texture in an urban environment in southern Brazil. Iheringia Serie Botanica, 71 (1), 49-54.
Mägdefrau, K. (1982). Life-forms of bryophytes. In Bryophyte Ecology (A.J.E. Smith, ed.). Chapman and Hall. Cambridge University Press, p. 45-58.
Medeiros, R., Young; C. E. F., Pavese, H. B., & Araújo, F. F. S. (2011). Contribuição das unidades de conservação brasileiras para a economia nacional. Brasília: UNEP-WCMC, 44p.
MMA-Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Áreas Protegidas. http://www.mma.gov.br/areas-protegidas/unidades-de-conservacao.html.
Milani, L. R., Prezoto, F., Clemente, M.A., Gomes, P. P., & Souza, M. M. (2020). Nesting Behaviour of a Neotropical Social Wasp Mischocyttarus saussurei Zikán, 1949 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Sociobiology 67 (1), 121-125. 10.13102/sociobiology.v67i1.4842
Oliveira, R. R.; Oliveira, H. C.; Peralta, D. F.; & Conceição, G. M. (2018). Acrocarpic mosses (Bryophyta) of Chapada das Mesas National Park, Maranhão, Brazil. Check List 14(6): 967-975. 10.15560/14.6.967
Pôrto, K. C., Silva, I., Reis, L., & Maciel-Silva, A. S. (2016). Sex ratios and sporophyte production in the moss Bryum argenteum Hedw. on a rock outcrop, north-eastern Brazil. Journal of Bryology, 38 (4), 194–198.
Rylands, A. B., & Brandon, K. (2005). Brazilian protected areas. Conservation Biology, l19 (3), 612‐618.
Reis, L. C. (2018). Briófitas epífitas em agroflorestas de cacau na Floresta Atlântica. (Tese Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal). Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife/PE.
Santos, R. C. P., & Lisboa, R. C. L. (2003). Musgos (Bryophyta) do Nordeste paraense Brasil-1 Zona Bragantina, Microrregião do Salgado e Município de Viseu. Acta Amazonica 33 (3), 415-422.
Silva, M. P. P., Kamino, L. H. Y., & Porto, K. C. (2014). Is the current network system of protected areas in the Atlantic Forest effective in conserving key species of bryophytes? Tropical Conservation Science, 7 (1), 61-74.
Shepherd, G. J. (2003). Avaliação do Estado do Conhecimento da Diversidade Biológica do Brasil /Plantas Terrestres, Unicamp.
WWF-Brasil (2010). Consulta pública e Unidade de Conservação. Fundação Florestal do Estado de São Paulo, Instituto Florestal, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Regigláucia Rodrigues de Oliveira; Ivanilza Moreira de Andrade
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
