Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19822Keywords:
Nursing; Nursing Diagnosis; Nursing Process; Review.Abstract
Objective: to describe the methodological steps of a review protocol, to map the scientific knowledge of accuracy of nursing diagnoses. Methodology: This scoping review will be developed as proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and adopted by The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. For the writing of the study, the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews will be used. An open search will be carried out in the databases, in addition to a search in gray literature, without limitation regarding the year of publication, language and type of design. Additionally, a search for articles will be carried out by reading the references of the studies included in the review. They will include primary and secondary studies that address diagnostic accuracy. Documents such as letters, comments, editors and opinion articles will be excluded. The selection of studies by reading the titles, abstracts and full text will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Data extraction takes place through a form built by the authors. Data will be organized, summarized and propagated in terms of extent, nature, distribution and recurring patterns, and the results will be communicated narratively and through figures and network maps. Conclusion: It is expected that the construction of this protocol will enable the development of a research with the least amount of biases possible, as it will make clear the methodological steps for the progress of a scope review about the accuracy in inferring nursing diagnoses.
References
Arksey, H. & O'malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 19-32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Barros, A. L. B. L., Silva, V. M., Santana, R. F., Cavalcante, A. M. R. Z., Vitor, A. F., Lucena, A. F., et al. (2020). Brazilian Nursing Process Research Network contributions for assistance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Bras Enferm,73(Suppl 2):e20200798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0798
Bolorino, N., Scholze, A. R., Ricardo, I. N., Freitas, F. M. B., Ribeiro, L. C. G., Melo, S. C. C. S., Ferreira, N. M. A. & Pieri, F. M. (2020). Performance by Community Health Agents on leprosy control actions: a scoping review protocol. Research, Society and Development, 9(9), e896998092. 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8092.
Bugs, T. V., Matos, F. G. O. A., Oliveira, J. L. C. & Alves, D. C. I. (2018). Avaliação da acurácia dos diagnósticos de enfermagem em um hospital universitário: avaliação da acurácia dos diagnósticos de enfermagem em um hospital universitário. Enfermeria Global, 1(52), 1-12. https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/eg/v17n52/pt_1695-6141-eg-17-52-166.pdf.
Brasil. Resolução nº 358, de 23 de outubro de 2009. (2009). Dispõe sobre a Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem e a implementação do Processo de Enfermagem em ambientes, públicos ou privados, em que ocorre o cuidado profissional de Enfermagem, e dá outras providências. Brasília: Conselho Federal de Enfermagem.
Chaves, R. R., Silva, C. F., Motta, E., Ribeiro, E. D. & Andrade, Y. N (2016). Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem: visão geral dos enfermeiros. Rev.Enferm UFPE, 10(4),1280-5.
Fortunato, L. M., Kruk, T. & Lima Júnior, E. (2021). Relação entre obesidade e distúrbios musculoesqueléticos: protocolo de revisão de escopo. Research, Society and Development, 10(8), e3521081623. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.16231
Pereira, F. A., Correia, D. M., & Moraes, E. B. (2021). Application of educational games for the assessment of self-care behavior in cardiac patients: scoping review protocol. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 5(5), e20050. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV20050
Freitas, P. C. A. (2019). Acurácia diagnóstica das características definidoras do diagnóstico de enfermagem padrão de sexualidade ineficaz em pessoas que vivem com HIV. 65 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Enfermagem) - Faculdade de Farmácia, Odontologia e Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza.
Herdman, T.H. & Kamitsuru, S. (2018). Diagnósticos de enfermagem da NANDA: Definições e Classificação 2018-2020. (11a ed.), Artmed.
Lunney, M. (2008). Critical Need to Address Accuracy of Nurses’ Diagnoses. Journal of Inssues in Nursing. OJIN. 13(1). http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/vol132008/No1Jan08/ArticlePreviousTopic/AccuracyofNursesDiagn oses.html.
Matos, F. G. O. A. & Cruz, D. A. L. M. (2009). Construção de instrumento para avaliar a acurácia diagnóstica. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da Usp, 43, 1088-1097. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0080-62342009000500013.
Naidoo, K. & Van Wyk, J.(2019). Protocol for a scoping review of age-related health conditions among geriatric populations in sub-Saharan Africa. Syst Rev 8, 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1055-z
Open Science Framework (OSF). https://osf.io/cm3bx 10.17605/OSF.IO/UVG2Q
Oliveira, I. M. & Silva, R. C. G. (2016). Comparação do grau de acurácia diagnóstica de graduandos e enfermeiros em programas de residência. Rev. min. enferm. [Internet]. 20: 952. http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/1085
Peters, M. D. J, Godfrey, C., Mcinerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C. & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12.
Peres, H. H. C., Jensen, R. & Martins, T. Y. C. (2016). Avaliação da acurácia diagnóstica em enfermagem: papel versus sistema de apoio à decisão. Acta paul. enferm. 29(2), 218-224. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3070/307046625013.pdf
Silva, C. C. R., Fernandes, M. I. D., Baptista, R. C. N., Silva, R. M. O., & Malfussi, L. B. H. (2020). Contribuições da simulação móvel para profissionais de saúde e comunidade: protocolo de scoping review. Enfermería Actual de Costa Rica, 39, 255-261. https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revenf.v0i39.40348
Sousa, A. R, Santos, G. L. A., Silva, R. S. & Carvalho, E. S. S. (2020). Reflexões sobre o Processo de Enfermagem no trabalho de enfermeiras frente à pandemia da Covid-19. Enferm. Foco, 11, 62-67. http://revista.cofen.gov.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/3501/804
Srivastava, P. & Hopwood, N. (2009). A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis. Int J Qual Methods, 76-84. 10.1177/160940690900800107.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 10.7326/M18-0850.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Lílian Miranda Belineli; Rafael Santos Lima; Adenir da Silva Júnior; Melissa Santos Nassif; Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa; Isabelle Cristinne Pinto Costa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
