Analysis of Paulo Freire’s influence on productions of graduate schools of the Federal University of Santa Maria (2009-2018)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i2.2059Keywords:
Science Teaching; Freire; Content Analysis.Abstract
The educator Paulo Freire presents a relevant legacy, especially when it comes to teacher training and a pedagogy that is critical and transformative. Due to the prominence of the research produced at the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), the objective of this work was to analyze the presence and influence of Freire in the Master and Doctorate productions of the institution, from 2009 to 2018, using the content analysis as a methodology. Six questions were employed for the quantitative and qualitative characterization of the works. 64 dissertations and 10 theses were found, most of which were concentrated in the Graduate Program in Education (PPGE), but also present in areas such as Psychology, Communication and even Economics. Most of the works were developed in a theoretical and practical way, being applied in schools and having the educators as research subjects. The main theorists used alongside Paulo Freire were Miguel G. Arroyo, Antonio Sampaio da Nóvoa, Maurice Tardif and Francisco Imbernón. The most developed categories related to Freire's thought were dialogue/dialogicity; teacher training; problematization and praxis. It is concluded that Freire's thinking remains present and influential in academic productions and it is hoped that these analyzes can guide educators and students in their studies, in order to further spread the pedagogical thinking proposed by Paulo Freire.
References
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Brasil. INEP: Inep - Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. Ministério da Educação. (2018). Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC). Retrieved 26 jun 2019, from http://portal.inep.gov.br/indice-geral-de-cursos-igc-.
Brasil. Lei Federal 12.612, de 13 de abril de 2012. Declara o educador Paulo Freire Patrono da Educação Brasileira. Retrieved 20 jun 2019, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2012/Lei/L12612.htm.
Delizoicov, D. (2011). Problemas e Problematizações. In: Pietrocola, M. (Org.). Ensino de Física: conteúdo, metodologia e epistemologia numa concepção integradora. Florianópolis: UFSC.
Demo, P. (2000). Metodologia do Conhecimento Científico. São Paulo: Atlas.
Folha de São Paulo. (2018). RUF: Ranking Universitário Folha 2018. Retrieved 26 jun 2019, from http://ruf.folha.uol.com.br/2018/ranking-de-universidades.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogia da Autonomia. 31. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Brasil. (1994). Pedagogia da Esperança: um reencontro com a pedagogia do oprimido. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Brasil. (1987). Pedagogia do Oprimido. 17. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Gadotti, M. (2008). Reinventando Paulo Freire na escola do século 21. In: Torres, C.A. et al. Reinventando Paulo Freire no Século 21. São Paulo: Editora e Livraria Instituto Paulo Freire. p. 91-108.
Gil, A. C. (2002). Como Elaborar Projetas de Pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Kauark, F.; Manhães, F. C.; Medeiros, C. H. (2010). Metodologia da Pesquisa: um guia prático. Itabuna: Via Litterarum.
Oliveira, M. F. S.; Guimarães, C. M. (2015, setembro). Contributos da Pedagogia de Paulo Freire à Formação de Professores. Anais do Congresso Nacional de Educação, Curitiba, PR, Brasil, 14.
Pernambuco, M. (2002). Significações e realidade: conhecimento (a construção coletiva do programa). In: Pontuschka, N. (Org.) Ousadia no Diálogo: interdisciplinaridade na escola pública. 4. ed. São Paulo: Loyola. p. 67-92.
Pernambuco, M. (2002). Quando a troca se estabelece (a relação dialógica). In: Pontuschka, N. (Org.). Ousadia no Diálogo: interdisciplinaridade na escola pública. 4. ed. São Paulo: Loyola. p. 19-35.
QS World University Rankings®. (2016). QS World University Rankings 2016-2017. Retrived 26 jun 2019, from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2016.
Saul, A. M.; Silva, A. F. G. (2009). O legado de Paulo Freire para as políticas de currículo e para a formação de educadores no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, Brasília, 90(224), 204-222.
Severino, A. J. (2002). Educação e universidade: conhecimento e construção da cidadania. Interface: Comunicação, Saúde e Educação, 6(10), 117-124.
Tavares, E. S. (Org.) (2016). 95 Anos de Paulo Freire. 1. ed. Santos: Unimes Virtual.
Times Higher Education. (2019). The World University Rankings. Retrieved 26 jun 2019, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2019/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats.
Torres, C. A. (2008). Novos pontos de partida da pedagogia política de Paulo Freire. In: Torres, C. A. et al. Reinventando Paulo Freire no Século 21. São Paulo: Editora e Livraria Instituto Paulo Freire. p. 41-56.
Yin, R. K. (2001). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
