Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21345Keywords:
Endodontics; Pediatric dentistry; Mechanized instrumentation; Deciduous teeth; Root canal.Abstract
Mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth is already a well-established and widely used practice in dentistry today. Several studies show considerable advantages when compared to the manual instrumentation technique, among them one can consider the reduction of surgical time and less discomfort to the patient during and after the procedure. Although the cost is considerably higher when compared to the treatment performed with manual instrumentation, this is justifiable. However, mechanized endodontics for endodontic treatments in pediatric dentistry is still questionable. The objective of this literature review was to identify advantages and disadvantages of the mechanized endodontic procedure in pediatric dentistry. Therefore, we carried out a bibliographic survey, considering publications from 2015 to 2020 on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Scielo, Springer and Cochrane platforms. Seventeen articles were selected, including in vitro studies, systematic reviews, and randomized studies and two bibliographic references, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto, 2012) and the manual “Guidelines for Clinical Procedures in Pediatric Dentistry – ABO”, released in 2020. After screening the materials, 8 articles, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto) and the ABO Manual were included in this review. It was concluded that, despite the significant benefits presented by mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth, no advantages of the technique were observed when applied in pediatric dentistry, unjustifying the high investment.
References
Referências
ABO. (2020). Diretrizes para Procedimentos Clínicos em Odontopediatria. Associação Brasileira de Odontopediatria. Santos. 2020. 19-21. 153-162.
Birck, D. R.. Miyagaki, D. C.. Corralo, D. J.. & Tonial, F. (2016). Estudo in vitro sobre a efetividade de desinfetantes na limpeza de cones de guta-percha. RFO Revista da Faculdade Odontologia de Passo Fundo, 21, 2. 10.5335/rfo.v21i2.6103
Estrela, C. (2018). Metodologia Científica: Ciência, Ensino, Pesquisa. Editora Artes Médicas.
Guedes-Pinto A. C., Haddad A. E., Mello-Moura, A. C. V., Fraga, C. P. T., Zardetto, C. G., Raggio, D. P., Guedes-Pinto, E., Santos, E. M., Almeida, E. R. B. H., Imparato, J. C. P., Motta, L. F. G., Bönecker, M., Wanderley, M. T., Corrêa, M. S. N. P., Fonoff, R. N., Bussadori, S. K., Chedid, S. J., & Ferreira, S. L. M. (2012). Manual de Odontopediatria. Manual de Odontopediatria. Ed. Santos.
Govindaraju, L., Jeevanandan, G., & Subramanian, E. (2017). Clinical Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time using Two Modified Rotary File Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR, 11(9), ZC55–ZC58. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/30069.10602
Hecksher, F., Vidigal, B., Coelho, P., Otoni, D., Alvarenga, C., & Nunes, E. (2018). Endodontic treatment in artificial deciduous teeth by manual and mechanical instrumentation: A pilot study. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 11(6), 510-512. 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1566
Hüslman, M. (2018). Notas de aula referentes a citação durante a aula do Prof. Dr. Carlos Bueno, 2020.
Jafarzadeh, M., Saatchi, M., Jafarnejadi, P., & Gooran, M. (2019). Digital Radiographic Evaluation of the Quality of Different Root Canal Obturation Techniques in Deciduous Mandibular Molars after Preparation with Rotary Technique. Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 20 (3), 152–158. doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44902
Katge F., Chimata, V. K., Poojari, M., Shetty, S., & Rusawat, B. (2016). Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time between rotary and manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth: An in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 124-127. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1347
Manchanda, S., Sardana, D., & Yiu, C. K. Y. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing rotary canal instrumentation techniques with manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth. International Endodontic Journal, 53, 333–353. doi:10.1111/iej.13233.
Mello-Moura, A. C. V., Moura-Netto, C., Moura, A. A. M., Guedes-Pinto, A. C., & Mendes, F. M. (2018). Tratamento endodôntico em dentes decíduos. Anuário de Odontopediatria Clínica. 154-167. http://www.fo.usp.br/pos/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Tratamento-Endodontico-em-dentes-deciduos.pdf
Musale, P. K., & Mujawar, S. A. (2014). Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. European archives of paediatric dentistry: official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 15(2), 113–120. doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1
Panchal, V., Jeevanandan, G., & Erulappan, S. M. (2019). Comparison between the Effectiveness of Rotary and Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 12(4), 340-346. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1637
Panchal, V., Jeevanandan, G., & Subramanian, E. M. G. (2019). Comparison of post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S files in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 467-472. doi:10.1007/s40368-019-00429-5
Prabhakar, A. R., Yavagal, C., Dixit, K., & Naik, S. V. (2016). Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 9(1), 45-49. 10.5005 /jp-journals-10005-1332
Preteli, H., Bezzoni, F., Faleiros, F. B. C., Dametto, F. R., & Vaz, L.G. (2011). Comparação entre soluções irrigadoras na endodontia: clorexidina x hipoclorito de sódio. RGO Rev.Gauc.Odont. 59 (supl.1), 127-132. http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/pdf/rgo/v59s1/a18v59s1.pdf
Silva, A. M. V., Lima, M. G. S., Figueiredo, M. G. F., Santos Júnior, V. E., Pereira, J. R. D., & Rosenblatt, A. (2015). Observação dos critérios para indicação de tratamento endodôntico em dentes decíduos na prática clínica. Odontologia. Clínico- Científica. 14, 1, 571-574. http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/pdf/occ/v14n1/a05v14n1.pdf
Siqueira Jr., J. F., Rôças, I. N., Lopes, H. P., Alves, F. R. F.. Oliveira, J. C. M., Armada, L., & Provenzano, J.C. (2012). Princípios biológicos do tratamento endodôntico de dentes com polpa necrosada e lesão perirradicular. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia. 69, 1, 8-14. http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/pdf/rbo/v69n1/a04v69n1.pdf
Imagens de Instrumentos e Equipamentos mecanizados:
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Cristina Toline; Carmela Rampazzo Bresolin; Caleb Shitsuka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
