The future of renewable energy and environmental agreements as mitigation of climate change and the possibility of compensation for avoided emissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21558Keywords:
CDM; GHG; Carbon; Paris Agreement.Abstract
The evolution of customs, human need and contemporary means of production require an enormous amount of energy, such a production model applied by society leads to an accelerated pace in the extraction of natural resources, renewable energies appear as a mitigation of impacts on the environment. climate and the environment, for a substitution of non-renewable energy sources to occur for renewable energy sources seeking to mitigate the emission of greenhouse gases - GHG, projects such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) are necessary, enabling the commercialization of carbon, thus helping developing countries on a path towards sustainable development and using energy from renewable sources as a tool to reduce emissions, the general objective of the work was to evaluate the use of renewable energy as a tool for environmental services aiming at mitigation of climate change. The methodology consisted of information obtained from documents and reports, from the official websites of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Center for Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development (UNEP DTU Partnership - CDM pipeline) and the National Agency of Electricity (ANEEL), in the results we identified a great difference between the projects in operation when related to the registrations in the CDM, and there were only two peaks of registrations of projects being in 2006 and 2012, the lack of registrations of the Brazilian projects can be give due to its complexity, bureaucracy, or uncertainty of its continuity given an uncertain future.
References
Agreement, P. (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Climate Change Secretariat: Bonn, Germany.
Assad, E. D., Martins, S. C., Cordeiro, L. A. M., & Evangelista, B. A. (2019). Sequestro de carbono e mitigação de emissões de gases de efeito estufa pela adoção de sistemas integrados. ILPF: inovação com integração de lavoura, pecuária e floresta (pp. 153-167). Brasília: Embrapa.
Azevedo, O. P. O. de. (2020) A governança global das energias renováveis. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Centro Universitário de Brasília, Brasília. https://repositorio.uniceub.br/jspui/handle/prefix/14515
Barbado, N., & Leal, A. C. (2021). Cooperação global sobre mudanças climáticas e a implementação do ODS 6 no Brasil. Research, Society and Development, 10(3), pp. e29110313290-e29110313290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13290
Benites, L. (2015). A participação da América Latina no Mecanismo de Desenvolvimento Limpo. Sustentabilidades, v. 5, n. 11. http://www.sustentabilidades.usach.cl/sites/sustentable/files/paginas/02_0.pdf
Bergamaschine, L. C. (2017). Políticas públicas e as contribuições potenciais do Cerrado para o cumprimento das metas brasileiras de redução das emissões de gases do efeito estufa. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia) —Universidade de Brasília, Brasília. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/31370
Boyd, E., & Schipper, E. L. (2002). The Marrakech Accord—at the crossroad to ratification: seventh conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Journal of Environment & Development, 11(2), 184-190. doi: 10.1177/10796502011002006.
Cepal, N. (2010). Objetivos de desarrollo del milenio: avances en la sostenibilidad ambiental del desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/2935
Chandra, A., McNamara, K. E., Dargusch, P., Damen, B., Rioux, J., Dallinger, J., & Bacudo, I. (2016). Resolving the UNFCCC divide on climate-smart agriculture. Carbon Management, 7(5-6), 295-299. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2016.1235420
Chrispim, M. C., de Souza, J. F. T., & Simões, A. F. (2019). Avaliação comparativa entre veículos elétricos e veículos convencionais no contexto de mitigação das mudanças climáticas. Revista Gestão & Sustentabilidade Ambiental, 8(1), 127-148. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19177/rgsa.v8e12019127-148
Couto Pereira, S. N. (2010). Payment for environmental services in the Amazon forest: how can conservation and development be reconciled?. The Journal of Environment & Development, 19(2), 171-190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496510368047.
Cunha, E. A. A., Siqueira, J. A. C., Nogueira, C. E. C., & Diniz, A. M. (2019). Aspectos históricos da energia eólica no Brasil e no mundo. Revista Brasileira de Energias Renováveis, 8(4). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rber.v8i4.65759
Dos Santos, F. L., & Silvano, R. A. M. (2016). Aplicabilidade, potenciais e desafios dos Pagamentos por Serviços Ambientais para conservação da água no sul do Brasil. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/dma.v38i0.43640
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological economics, 65(4), 663-674. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Vianna, W. B. (2007). O design na pesquisa quali-quantitativa em engenharia de produção-Questões a considerar. Revista Gestão Industrial, 3(3), 172-185. doi:10.3895/S1808-04482007000300011
Estrela, C. (2018). Metodologia científica: ciência, ensino, pesquisa. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Farley, J., & Costanza, R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological economics, 69(11), 2060-2068. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010
Fearnside, P. M. (2015). Tropical hydropower in the clean development mechanism: Brazil’s Santo Antônio Dam as an example of the need for change. Climatic Change, 131(4), 575-589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1393-3
Fernandes, E. A., & Leite, G. B. (2021). Atuação dos projetos de mecanismo de desenvolvimento limpo para o desenvolvimento sustentável no Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 41, 351-371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572021-3168
Gauvin, C., Uchida, E., Rozelle, S., Xu, J., & Zhan, J. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services with dual goals of environment and poverty alleviation. Environmental management, 45(3), 488-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9321-9
Góes, M. D. F. B., Andrade, J. C. S., Silva, M. S., & Santana, A. C. (2018). Projetos de mdl de energia eólica no nordeste do brasil: perfil e cobenefícios declarados. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 12(2), 71-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v12i2.1477
He, J., Huang, Y., & Tarp, F. (2014). Has the Clean Development Mechanism assisted sustainable development?. In Natural Resources Forum (Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 248-260). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12055
Honkonen, T. (2009). The Principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibility in Post‐2012 Climate Negotiations. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 18(3), 257-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2009.00648.x
Kirkman, G. A n, Seres, S., Haites, E., & Spalding-Fecher, R. (2012). Benefits of the clean development mechanism 2012. In: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/abc_2012.pdf
Kuyper, J., Schroeder, H. & Linnér, B. O. (2018) The evolution of the UNFCCC. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 43, p. 343-368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030119
Lazaro, L. L. B., & Gremaud, A. P. (2017). Contribuição para o desenvolvimento sustentável dos projetos de mecanismo de desenvolvimento limpo na América Latina. Organizações & Sociedade, 24, 53-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9230803
Leff, E. (2011). Complexidade, interdisciplinaridade e saber ambiental. Olhar de professor, 14(2), 309-335. doi: 10.5212/OlharProfr.v.14i2.0007
Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2011). Making climate change governable: accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 187-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.576531
Matiello, S., Pagani, C. H. P., Leal, M. L. M., Cerri, F., & Moret, A. D. S. (2018). Energia e desenvolvimento: alternativas energéticas para áreas isoladas da Amazônia. Revista Presença Geográfica, 5(1), 11-21.
Neves, M. F., & Trombin, V. G. (2014). A dimensão do setor sucroenergetico. Ribeirão Preto: Markestrat
Ormond, J., & Goodman, M. K. (2015). A new regime of carbon counting: The practices and politics of accounting for everyday carbon through CO2e. Global Environmental Change, 34, 119-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.011
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica.[e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed (pp. 3-9). UAB/NTE/UFSM
Piris-Cabezas, P., Lubowski R., Schwartzman, S., Golub A. & Keohane N. (2016) Cost-effective emissions reductions beyond Brazil’s international target: estimation and valuation of Brazil’s potential climate asset, environmental defense fund Washington. http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/cost-effective-emissions-reductions-brazil.pdf
Rodrigues, L. M., Lira, M. A. T., & Sousa, M. L. D. (2020). Mitigação dos Efeitos das Mudanças Climáticas a partir da Substituição Gradual de Termelétricas a Carvão por Usinas Fotovoltaicas. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, 35, 415-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-7786353006
Sica, E. T, Camargo, C. B., Neto, E. A. C. A, Cechinel, C., Carvalho, R. T., Okuda, B. S. (2009) Avaliação multicritério de empreendimentos de geração e transmissão de energia elétrica: uma abordagem por meio dos critérios de projetos de MDL. In: XX SNPTEE SEMINÁRIO NACIONAL DE PRODUÇÃO E TRANSMISSÃO DE ENERGIA ELÉTRICA,4. Rbep. Recife.
Silva, A. J. H. D. (2014). Metodologia de pesquisa: conceitos gerais. Paraná, UNICENTRO.
SOUSA, R. G (2013). Avaliação do modelo de monitoramento ambiental no Estado do Pará: estudo de caso da SEMA/PA. Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Trópico Úmido) - Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém. http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/10967
UNEP DTU Partnership (2021). Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development. https://unepdtu.org/
UNFCCC. (2021) Clean Development Mechanism. https://cdm.unfccc.int/
UNFCCC. (2021) Santo Antonio Hydropower Project. https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/PJR%20CDM1356613142.79/view
Wunder, S., Engel, S., & Pagiola, S. (2021). Payments for environmental services in developing and developed countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 663-852.
Xue, B., Ma, Z., Geng, Y., Heck, P., Ren, W., Tobias, M. & Fujita, T. (2015). A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 338-346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.056
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Michael Raphael Soares Vieira; Arlindo Almeida de Lima Filho; Aixa Braga Lopes; Eneida Guerra Silvestrim; Fernanda Guerra Silvestrim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
