Res judicata, rescissory action and the stabilizing of judicial decisions principle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.22067Keywords:
Stabilization; Rescissory action; Security.Abstract
In the presente article will be analized the means by which the legal act may acquire the stability, that are the stabilization, preclusion and res judicata, so that will be defined the difference between these three institutes, as well as the importance of the stability of the legal act for the brasilian civil procedural order will be studied, the relevance of the principle of stabilisation of judicial decisions and aspects of the Rescission Action, its legal nature and its hypotheses of application described in the tax roll of the procedural legislation, especially with regard to the impact of such action on the stabilisation of judicial decisions in order to examine whether or not the Rescission Action breaks the security and stability expected of the legal act, it is verified also that the rescission action is endorsed with importance because it protects the legal system and also corrects injustices, concluding that there is no need to speak of an affront to legal security.
References
Almeida, L. F. (2013). A extensão da coisa julgada no novo CPC e a extinção da ação declaratória incidental: uma medida de segurança jurídica. Revista eletrônica de direito processual. 342(12), 12. https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/8684/6556.
Alvim, A. (2016). Novo contencioso cível no CPC 2015. RT.
Brasil. (1998). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicaocompilado.htm.
Brasil. (2015). Código de Processo Civil. <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm>.
Bedaque, J. R. S. (2010). Efetividade do processo e técnica processual. (3a ed.), Malheiros.
Bulos, U. L. (2012). Curso de direito constitucional. (7a. ed.), rev. e atual. de acordo com a Emenda Constitucional n. 0/2012 – São Paulo: Saraiva.
Câmara, A. F. (2015). O novo processo civil brasileiro. Atlas.
Carnelutti, F. (2000). Sistema de direito processual civil. Classic Book.
Carvalho, S. A. (2017). Da ampliação do cabimento da ação rescisória no cpc de 2015 e a (in)segurança jurídica no sistema processual brasileiro. Revista Direito UNIFACS – Debate Virtual, n. 207.
Chiovenda, G. (2002). Instituíções de direito processual civil. Bookseller.
Chiovenda, G. Instituições de direito processual civil. (1998). Bookseller, 1998 com anotações de Enrico Túlio Liebman. Bookseller.
Jr. Didier, F., & Cunha, L. C. (2016). Curso de Direito Processual Civil: meios de impugnação às decisões judiciais e processo nos tribunais. (13a ed.), Juspodivm, v. 3.
Jr Nery, N. & Nery, R. M. (2004). Código de Processo Civil Comentado e legislação extravagante. (8a ed.), Editora Revista dos Tribunais.
Koche, J. C. (2011). Fundamentos de metodologia científica. Vozes.
Leite, C. H. B (1997). Curso de direito processual do trabalho, 1, (2a ed.), LTr.
Liebman, E. T. (2006). Eficácia e autoridade da sentença e outros escritos sobre a coisa julgada. Forense.
Neves, D. A. A. (2016). Manual de direito processual civil. JusPodivm.
Rocha, R. H. M. Preclusão do processo civil. (2011). Livraria do Advogado Editora, 2011.
Rodrigues, J., Fernandes. R. L., & Bueno, F. F. (2019). Tutela antecipada antecedente: Estabilização x ação rescisória. Rev. Ciênc. Juríd. Soc. Unipar. Umuarama. 22(2), 241-255.
Serra, V. M. T. (2009). A coisa julgada inconstitucional. Revista EMERJ, p. 3, Rio de Janeiro. https://www.emerj.tjrj.jus.br/paginas/tra balhos_conclusao/ 2s eme stre2009/trabalhos_22009/ViniciusMirandaTallaridaSerra.pdf.
Zufelato, C. (2011). Coisa julgada coletiva. Saraiva.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
