Analysis of brazilian scientific production on ethnobotanics: scoping review protocol

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.22493

Keywords:

Ethnobotany; Medicinal plants; Traditional Communities; Traditional use.

Abstract

This article presents the scope review protocol on Brazilian scientific production on ethnobotany. And it aims to document the processes involved in the planning and methodological conduct of this unprecedented study, examining the extent, scope and nature of research activities in ethnobotany in Brazil with a view to identifying possible research gaps in the existing literature. This review will be conducted following the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and prepared in accordance with the items of the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. To this end, scientific articles published in the following languages ​​will be selected and reviewed: English, Portuguese and Spanish in the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed /Medline, Lilacs/BVS, Scopus, and Scielo. This protocol has been registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF), under doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N4XD3. It is hoped that this study will map and demonstrate the scenario and panorama of ethnobotanical studies carried out in Brazil, which may guide the conduct of future research on this topic in our country.

References

Albuquerque, U. P. de., & Hanazaki, N. (2006). As pesquisas etnodirigidas na descoberta de novos fármacos de interesse médico e farmacêutico: fragilidades e pespectivas. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, 16, 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-695x2006000500015

Araújo, W. C. O. (2020). Recuperação da informação em saúde: construção, modelos e estratégias. In Convergências em Ciência da Informação (Vol. 3, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.33467/conci.v3i2.13447

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). “Scoping the scope” of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015

Brasil. (2016). Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica. Política e Programa Nacional de Plantas Medicinais e Fitoterápicos. Brasília, DF: Ministério Da Saúde. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/ bvs/publicacoes/politica_programa_nacional_plantas_medicinais_fitoterapicos.pdf.

Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013

Cordeiro, L., & Soares, C. B. (2019). Revisão de escopo: potencialidades para a síntese de metodologias utilizadas em pesquisa primária qualitativa. Bis, 37–43.

Daudt, H. M. L., Van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48

Elisabetsky, E. (2003). Etnofarmacologia. Ciência e Cultura, 55(3), 35–36.

Franco, F., Lamano-Ferreira, A. P. do N., & Ferreira, M. L. (2011). Etnobotânica: Aspectos Históricos E Aplicativos Desta Ciência. Caderno de Cultura e Ciência, 10(2), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.14295/cad.cult.cienc.v10i2.407

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Downloads

Published

13/11/2021

How to Cite

SILVA, M. A. da; ALMEIDA, F. H. O. de .; SANTOS, D. C. T. dos .; SILVA, W. B. da .; SILVA, F. A. da . Analysis of brazilian scientific production on ethnobotanics: scoping review protocol. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 14, p. e545101422493, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.22493. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22493. Acesso em: 18 apr. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 14

Section

Health Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Andréa da Silva; Fernando Henrique Oliveira de Almeida; Davi Cravo Teles dos Santos; Wellington Barros da Silva; Francilene Amaral da Silva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.