Right to image, public agents and media: impacts on protecting the image of suspects after the new law of abuse of authority

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23321

Keywords:

Right to image; Violation; Media; Public official; Law 13.869/2019.

Abstract

The right to image protects the physical representation of the body and the characteristic features by which a person can be recognized. Suspects of committing crimes suffered violations of this right by the media and public officials. This violation influenced public opinion, allowing citizens to be judged prematurely, without the right to a defense and the presumption of innocence. The difficulties in protecting the right to image pointed to the need for its regulation by the legal system, which recently occurred with the enactment of Law 13,869/2019, known as the new law of abuse of authority. Thus, the objective of the research is to investigate whether article 13 of Law 13.869/2019 has impacted the performance of public agents of the State of Pernambuco and the media discourse regarding the non-violation of the right to image. The methodology used in the research will be the content analysis of news about police operations, in the fight against the crime of drug trafficking in the state of Pernambuco, disseminated on the websites of the main programs that present police actions in the state, namely: Por dentro com Cardinot (TV Jornal/SBT) and Balanço Geral PE (TV Clube/Rede Record), in the period between 2019 and 2020. Thus, it is expected that it will be possible to conclude whether there was an impact on the protection of suspects' image after the implementation of the law.

Author Biography

Elaine Alves Silva de Santana, Universidade Católica de Pernambuco

Master's student in Law at the Catholic University of Pernmambuco, with a scholarship funded by CAPES; Lawyer for 9 years; Postgraduate in Law and Civil Procedure from Faculdade Joaquim Nabuco (2016); Postgraduate in Labor Law and Process from Faculdade Estácio do Recife (2015); Postgraduate in Human Rights from the Catholic University of Pernambuco (2013); bachelor's degree in Law from Faculdade Estácio do Recife (2011) and Bachelor's Degree in Social Work from the Federal University of Pernambuco (2007).

References

Affonso, F. J. M. (2021). O direito à imagem na era das deep fakes. Revista RBD Civil. 27(1). https://rbdcivil.emnuvens.com.br/rbdc/article/view/438.

Alves, J. A. L. (2005). Os direitos humanos na pós-modernidade. Perspectiva.

Bardin, L. (2002). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Brasil (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.

Brasil (2002). Código Civil – Lei nº 10.406 de 10 de janeiro de 2002. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/l10406compilada.htm.

Brasil (2019). Lei nº 13.869 de 5 de setembro de 2019. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2019/lei/L13869.htm.

Brasil (2020). Levantamento Nacional de Informações Penitenciárias (Infopen) do ano de 2019. Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública. http://antigo.depen.gov.br/DEPEN/depen/sisdepen/infopen.

Bobbio, N. (2004). A era dos direitos. Campus.

Castro, J. R. de, & Castro, J. R. de (2020). Direito Humano e Fundamental do acesso à justiça: análise do jus postulandi e a indispensabilidade do advogado sob a perspectiva dos direitos da personalidade. Research, Society and Development, 9(12), e36191211196, 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.11196. https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11196.

Coutinho, L. M. & Quartiero, E. M. (2020). Cultura, mídias e identidades na Pós-modernidade. Florianópolis: Perspectiva, 27(1), 47-68, http://www.perspectiva.ufsc.br.

Debord, G. (1997). A sociedade do espetáculo. Contraponto.

Durval, H. (1988). Direito à imagem. Editora Saraiva.

Foucault, M. (2004). A ordem do discurso. Edições Loyola.

Franciulli Netto, D. (2020). A Proteção ao Direito à Imagem e a Constituição Federal. Informativo Jurídico da Biblioteca Ministro Oscar Saraiva, 16(1), 1-74, https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:fETa50r9VQEJ:https://ww2.stj.jus.br/publicacaoinstitucional/index.php/informativo/article/download/442/400+&cd=1&hl=pt-BR&ct=clnk&gl=br.

Hall, S. (2006). Identidade cultural na pós-modernidade. DP&A.

Hall, S. (2000). Quem precisa da identidade? In:, T.T. (org), Identidade e diferença: a perspectiva dos estudos culturais, 103-133. Vozes.

Lima, R. B. (2020). Nova lei de abuso de autoridade. Juspodivm.

Lima, V. A. de (2012). Liberdade de expressão x liberdade de imprensa: direito à comunicação e a democracia. (2a ed.), Publisher Brasil.

Lindgren Alves, J. A. (2005). Os direitos humanos na pós-modernidade. Perspectiva.

Lobo, E. da C., Lima, N. A. de (2020). Limites ao Direito Constitucional à imagem sob a ótica da veiculação de fotografias em matérias jornalísticas policiais. Nova Hileia/Revista Eletrônica de Direito Ambiental da Amazônia. 7(1), 1-20, http://periodicos.uea.edu.br/index.php/novahileia/article/view/1696.

Maingueneau, D. (2004). Análise de textos de comunicação. Tradução Cecília P. de Souza e Silva. Décio Rocha. (3a ed.), Cortez.

Santos, B. de S., & Chaui, M. (2013). Direitos Humanos. Democracia e Desenvolvimento. Cortez.

Sarlet, I. W. (2010). A Eficácia dos Direitos Fundamentais: uma teoria geral dos direitos fundamentais na perspectiva constitucional. Livraria do Advogado.

Sousa, S. A. de (2020). Discurso, autor e sujeito dentro da obra A Ordem do Discurso de Michel Foucault: uma análise metadiscursiva. https://www.ufjf.br/darandina/files/2010/01/Simone-Aparecida-de-Sousa.pdf.

Downloads

Published

05/12/2021

How to Cite

SANTANA, E. A. S. de . Right to image, public agents and media: impacts on protecting the image of suspects after the new law of abuse of authority. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 16, p. e181101623321, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23321. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23321. Acesso em: 20 apr. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 16

Section

International Congress on Democracy and Justice in the 21st Century - JUST2021

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Elaine Alves Silva de Santana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.