Public actions and policies in mangroves for the preservation of environmental

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23345

Keywords:

Mangrove ecosystem; Public policy; Environmental services.

Abstract

Ecosystems are the foundation of ecology. The relationship between them and man takes place through the use of their environmental services, which ends up in the breakdown of their resilience or depletion. In this aspect, mangroves are included, which are extremely important as a source of income for surrounding communities. The objective of this work was to discuss actions of its use and conservation and if there is integration with public policies in Brazil and in the world. The research carried out was exploratory. Mangroves are present among tropical areas, mainly between latitudes 30° N and 30° S, with Brazil having approximately 13,989 km² of this feature on its coast, with 87% present in the interior of Conservation Units. It was noticed that, in Brazil, the law is still adapting to the need to protect these ecosystems, changing the concepts present in its letters for preservation over the years. In the United States, Florida laws show a focus on sustainable development. The valuation of mangroves is important in establishing public policies and investments, benefiting communities involved with them. The Ramsar convention establishes ways of sustainable use of wetlands in several countries. This convention makes no distinction between areas, and in Brazil the laws emulate it, where mangroves share the same considerations as other features. It was noticed that Brazilian legislation for mangroves does not have specificities that deal with their sustainable use, but that the projects created in these areas have very important and satisfactory results.

References

Bann, C. (1998). The economic valuation of mangroves: A manual for researchers. Economy and Enviroment Program for Southeast Asia, 64.

Blotta, K. D., Guimarães, L. L., Braz, E. M. Q., Magenta, M. A. G., Ribeiro, R. B., & Giordano, F. (2021). Diagnóstico de Manguezais Periurbanos após 20 anos de impactos antrópicos. Research, Society and Development, 10(1).

Carvalho, A. V. de, Bastos, M. de N. do C., Gurgel, E. S. C., Harada, A. Y., Nascimento, M. I. H. do, Marceliano, M. L. V., Silva, M. das G. S. da, & Gomes, A. de L. S. (2018). Valoração econômica contingente dos recursos ambientais do ecossistema manguezal em São Caetano de Odivelas (PA). Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais, 9(6), 409–427.

Cassiano, L. da A. (2016). Pagamento por serviços ambientais: Uma alternativa para a preservação das áreas de mangue do estuário do rio Paraíba. [Monografia]. Universidade Federal da Paraíba.

Costa, D. F. da S. (2017). Serviços ecossistêmicos prestados pelos manguezais do Rio Grande do Norte (nordeste do Brasil). Os desafios da Geografia Física na Fronteira do Conhecimento, 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.20396/sbgfa.v1i2017.2025.

Florida State Law (1996). Mangrove Trimming & Preservation Act. 9321-9333.

Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L. L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T., Masek, J., & Duke, N. (2011). Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Gloval Ecology and Biogeography, 154–159.

Granziera, M. L. M., Adame, A., & Gallo, G. N. (2006). Direito ambiental internacional. Conservação dos espaços e da biodiversidade. Convenção RAMSAR. 15, 21. http://www.publicadireito.com.br/conpedi/manaus/arquivos/anais/manaus/direito_ambiental_maria_luiza_m_granziera_e_outros.pdf.

Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. (2018a). Atlas dos Manguezais do Brasil.

Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. (2018b). Brazilian mangrove atlas. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade.

Instituto Peabiru (2021, outubro 10). “Mangues da Amazônia” promove educação ambiental e recuperação de áreas na maior faixa de manguezal contínuo do mundo. Recuperado de https://peabiru.org.br/2021/03/04/mangues-da-amazonia-promove-educacao-ambiental-e-recuperacao-de-areas-na-maior-faixa-de-manguezal-continuo-do-mundo/.

Internacional Union for Conservation of Nature (1996). Pacific Mangroves Initiative. https://www.iucn.org/regions/oceania/our-work/deploying-nature-based-solutions/water-and-wetlands/completed-projects/pacific-mangroves-initiative.

Kathiresan, K., & Bingham, B. L. (2001). Biology of Mangroves and Mangrove Ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology, 40, 81–251.

Medeiros, S. R. M. de, Carvalho, R. G. de, & Pimenta, M. R. C. (2014, dezembro). A proteção do ecossistema manguezal a luz da lei 12.651/2012: Novos desafios para a sustentabilidade dos manguezais do Rio Grande do Norte. Geotemas, 4(2), 59–78.

Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2021, outubro 1). Áreas Úmidas – Convenção de Ramsar. https://antigo.mma.gov.br/biodiversidade/biodiversidade-aquatica/zonas-umidas convencao-de-ramsar.html.

Miranda, A. M., Marinho, A. da S., Farias, C. S. S., & Meireles, A. J. (2016). O valor do manguezal: Educação ambiental como instrumento social—Praia de Mundaú—Trairí/CE. Revista de Educação Ambiental, 21(2), 72–86.

Nova Mata (2021, novembro 4). Projeto Uçá. https://novamata.org/iniciativa/projeto-uca/.

Schaeffer-Novelli, Y. (1999) Grupo de Ecossistemas: Manguezal, Marisma e Apicum.

Spalding, M., & Leal, M. (2021). The state of the world’s mangroves 2021. Global Mangrove Alliance.

Vannucci, M. (2003). Os manguezais e nós: uma síntese de percepções. Edusp.

Published

29/11/2021

How to Cite

SILVA, E. J. .; FONTGALLAND, I. L. . Public actions and policies in mangroves for the preservation of environmental . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 15, p. e585101523345, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23345. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23345. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Engineerings