Evaluation of the quality of life of coffee growers in Poço Fundo-MG with the SF-36 instrument during the COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23484Keywords:
Quality of life; Surveys and questionnaires; Rural population health.Abstract
On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency, and on March 11, the epidemic was updated to a pandemic. Without much ceremony, COVID-19 broke with our familiar routine, changing our daily lives. In this new scenario, uncertainties and insecurities were triggered or intensified. With the advancement of technology, the forms of perception and interaction with the world have changed and the crisis caused by the pandemic has brought with it a digital revolution, as social isolation has become an essential factor in combating the spread of the disease, with strict blocking rules and social distance in many countries. In view of this scenario, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of coffee growers in the COOPFAM cooperative in the city of Poço Fundo-MG through the SF-36 instrument via an online questionnaire during the COVID-19 pandemic. The SF-36 is a multidimensional questionnaire consisting of 36 items, encompassed in 8 scales or components: functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health, vitality, social aspects, emotional aspects, mental health and one more comparative evaluation question between current health conditions and that of a year ago. It assesses both the negative aspects of health (disease or illness) and the positive aspects (well-being).
References
Adorno, M. L. G. R. & Brasil-Neto, J. P. (2013) Avaliação da qualidade de vida com o instrumento SF-36 em lombalgia crônica. Acta Ortop Bras, 21(4): 202-7.
Almeida Júnior, S. et al. (2020). COVID-19 e a infecção por SARS-CoV-2 em um panorama geral. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, 3(2): 3508-3522.
Borges, D. A. H. et al. (2013) Análise da participação em uma organização produtora de café orgânico no município de Poço Fundo no sul de Minas Gerais. VIII Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil, Salvador.
Castro, M. et al. (2003) Qualidade de vida de pacientes com insuficiência renal crônica em hemodiálise avaliada através do instrumento genérico SF-36. Rev Assoc Med Bras, 49(3): 245-9.
Cavino, V. C. O. (2013) A experiência de comércio justo de agricultores familiares da cooperativa COOPFAM de Poço Fundo (MG): identificando os obstáculos e as potencialidades da transição para a agricultura de base ecológica. UFSCar, São Carlos.
Ciconelli, R. M. et al. (1999) Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol, 39(3):143-50.
Cruz, R. M.et al. (2020). COVID-19: Emergência e Impactos na Saúde e no Trabalho. Revista Psicologia: Organizações & Trabalho (Rpot), Brasilia, p. 20-22.
Dalfovo, M. S.; Lana, R. A. & Silveira, A. (2008). Métodos quantitativos e qualitativos: um resgate teórico. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, Blumenau, 2(4), 01- 13.
Do Vale, A. R. et al (2014). A cafeicultura em Minas Gerais: estudo comparativo entre as regiões Triângulo Mineiro/Alto Paranaíba e Sul/Sudoeste. CAMPO-TERRITÓRIO: Revista de geografia agrária. Edição especial do XXI ENGA-2012, p. 1-23.
Dourado, N. P. (2017). O fortalecimento da agricultura familiar de base agroecológica como vetor de desenvolvimento territorial: o caso da COOPFAM no município de Poço Fundo – MG. VIII Seminário Internacional sobre Desenvolvimento regional: Territórios, Redes e Desenvolvimento Regional: Perspectivas e Desafios. Santa Cruz do Sul.
Faleiros, F. et al. (2016). Use of virtual questionnaire and dissemination as a data collection strategy in scientific studies. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, [S.L.], 25(4): 25-30.
Guirado, G. M. P. et al. (2021). Avaliação da qualidade de vida de trabalhadores antes e durante a pandemia de COVID-19 por meio do questionário SF-36. Rev. Gest. Sist. Saúde, São Paulo, 10(1): 84-105.
Ministério da Saúde (2020). Secretaria de Atenção Especializada à Saúde (SAES). Departamento de Atenção Hospitalar, Domiciliar e de Urgência (DAHU). Protocolo de manejo clínico para o novo coronavírus (2019-nCoV). <https://portalarquivos2.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2020/fevereiro/11/protocolo-manejo-coronavirus.pdf> Acesso em: 26 set. 2020.
Moreira, J. P. L. (2015). A saúde dos trabalhadores da atividade rural no Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 31(8): 1698-1708.
Moretti, S.A. et al. (2020). Nossas Vidas em Meio à Pandemia da COVID - 19: Incertezas e Medos Sociais. Rev Enfermagem e Saúde Coletiva, 4(2): 32-41.
Oliveira, A. K. B. et al. (2020). Qualidade de vida e distanciamento social: revisão sistemática da literatura. Research, Society and Development, 9(8).
Pereira, E. F. et al. (2012). Qualidade de vida: abordagens, conceitos e avaliação. Rev. Bras. Educ. Fís. Esporte, São Paulo, 26(2): 241-250.
Reis, S. N. et al. (2020). Pandemic, social isolation and the importance of people-plant interaction. Ornamental Horticulture, [S.L.], 26(3): 399-412.
Romano, C.M. et al. (2020). Past, present, and future of COVID-19: a review. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, [S.L.], 53(9): 53-59.
Silva, R. O. et al. (2021). Avaliação da qualidade de vida com o instrumento SF-36 durante a pandemia do COVID-19: Um estudo piloto. Research, Society and Development, 10(9).
World Health Organization (2020). Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Disponível em: < https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIr9Ks562J6gIVTwmRCh1RbwgjEAAYASAAEgK_V_D_BwE> Acesso em: 16 jun.2020.
Zhang, Y., & Ma, Z. F. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Quality of Life among Local Residents in Liaoning Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7): 2381.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Luísa Nascimento Aquino; Roberta de Oliveira e Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
