Cost-Benefit Analysis on the use of BIM in the Construction of the Complex Prison in Araçoiaba
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i17.24201Keywords:
BIM; Clash Detection; Building Information Modeling; Project management.Abstract
Nowadays, it’s usual to have costs with rework during the construction process. This can be attributed to problems regarding the coordination across disciplines in a project, and due to problems regarding untrained professionals. In this context, the present study aims to demonstrate and evaluate the use of clash detection tools associated with BIM (Building Information Modeling) Platforms to analyze clash reports and coordinate the model as close to construction as possible. BIM is a process to generate and manage building data that has tools, platforms, and environments to optimize and automatize the process of conflict detections among different projects. Based on this, a case study was conducted in order to verify the benefits brought with the use of the clash detection tool in the management of the construction of the Araçoiaba Prison Complex developed by the coordinator of the construction of this project. The methodology utilized consisted of the analysis of twenty Critical Analysis Report. The main goal of the case study was to verify the cost needed to solve the identified conflicts to run a benefit-cost analysis. The results of the study confirmed the advantages associated with verifying conflicts across disciplines in projects by using BIM Technology.
References
Abd, A. M., & Khamees, A. S. (2017). As built case studies for BIM as conflicts detection and documentation tool. Cogent Engineering, 4(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2017.1411865
Akponeware, A. O., & Adamu, Z. A. (2017). Clash Detection or Clash Avoidance? An Investigation into Coordination Problems in 3D BIM. Buildings, 7(3), 75. doi: 10.3390/buildings7030075
Bana e Costa, C. A., Oliveira, C. S., & Vieira, V. (2008). Prioritization of bridges and tunnels in earthquake risk mitigation using multicriteria decision analysis: Application to Lisbon. Omega, 36(3), 442–450. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.05.008
Barrocal, A., & Pellegrini, M. (2015, March). Se cadeia resolvesse, o Brasil seria exemplar.
Berkes, F., & Davidson‐Hunt, I. J. (2007). Communities and social enterprises in the age of globalization. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 1(3), 209–221. doi: 10.1108/17506200710779521
Brasil. Decreto no 7.983, de 08 de abril de 2013. Estabelece regras e critérios para elaboração do orçamento de referência de obras e serviços de engenharia, contratados e executados com recursos dos orçamentos da União, e dá outras providências. , Pub. L. No. Decreto No 7.983, de 8 de Abril de 2013 (2013). Brasil.
Brito, D. M. De, & Ferreira, E. de A. M. (2015). Avaliação de estratégias para representação e análise do planejamento e controle de obras utilizando modelos BIM 4D. Ambiente Construído, 15(4), 203–223. doi: 10.1590/s1678-86212015000400047
Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971–980. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001
Carmona, F. V. F., Carvalho, M. T. M., Carmona, F. V. F., & Carvalho, M. T. M. (2017). Caracterização da utilização do BIM no Distrito Federal. Ambiente Construído, 17(4), 385–401. doi: 10.1590/s1678-86212017000400203
Coutinho, A. B., Moura, G. S., & Teixeira, E. K. da C. (2021). Compatibilização de um projeto arquitetônico e hidrossanitário utilizando a metodologia BIM. Research, Society and Development, 10(2), e58610212924. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12924
Dantas Filho, J. B. P., Barros Neto, J. de P., & Angelim, B. M. (2017). Mapeamento do fluxo de valor de processo de construção virtual baseado em BIM. Ambiente Construído, 17(4), 343–358. doi: 10.1590/s1678-86212017000400201
Gholizadeh, P., Esmaeili, B., & Goodrum, P. (2018). Diffusion of Building Information Modeling Functions in the Construction Industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(2), 04017060. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000589
Hamdi, O., & Leite, F. (2014). Conflicting Side of Building Information Modeling Implementation in the Construction Industry. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 6(3), 03013004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000137
Jacobsson, M., & Merschbrock, C. (2018). BIM coordinators: a review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(8), 989–1008. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-03-2017-0050
Liesiö, J., Mild, P., & Salo, A. (2008). Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. European Journal of Operational Research, 190(3), 679–695. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.049
Machado, E. L., Sotsek, N. C., Scheer, S., & Santos, A. D. P. L. (2018). Seleção de sistemas construtivos utilizando BIM e método de tomada de decisão multicritério. Revista ALCONPAT, 8(2), 209. doi: 10.21041/ra.v8i2.246
Mechler, R. (2016). Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost–benefit analysis. Natural Hazards, 81(3), 2121–2147. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2170-y
Mesároš, P., & Mandičák, T. (2017). Exploitation and Benefits of BIM in Construction Project Management. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245(6). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062056
Novaes, C. C. (2001). Ações para controle e garantia da qualidade de projetos na construção de edifício. Workshop Nacional Gestão Do Processo De Projeto Na Construção De Edifícios, (16), 5.
Oberlender, G. D. (2014). Project management for engineering and construction (Third Edit). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2018). Looking at the big picture of IS investment appraisal through the lens of systems theory: A System Dynamics approach for understanding the economic impact of BIM. Computers in Industry, 99(April), 262–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.029
Pärn, E. A., Edwards, D. J., & Sing, M. C. P. (2018). Origins and probabilities of MEP and structural design clashes within a federated BIM model. Automation in Construction, 85(November 2017), 209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.010
Ruschel, R. C., Andrade, M. L. V. X. de, & Morais, M. de. (2013). O ensino de BIM no Brasil: onde estamos? Ambiente Construído, 13(2), 151–165. doi: 10.1590/S1678-86212013000200012
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM Handbook (Third Edit). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi: 10.1002/9780470261309
Santos, D. M., & Piacente, F. J. (2021). Indústria 4.0: Building Information Modelling no Custo de Construção Pública. Research, Society and Development, 10(1), e25210111681. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11681
Santos, D. M., Piacente, F. J., Neves, J. M. S. das, & Azevedo, M. M. de. (2021). Estudo comparativo da implementação da Modelagem da Informação da construção em obras públicas no Brasil e no Reino Unido. Research, Society and Development, 10(1), e25310111686. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11686
SDSCJ. (2014). Pedra Fundamental inicia obras do Complexo Prisional de Araçoiaba.
Selçuk Çıdık, M., Boyd, D., & Thurairajah, N. (2017). Innovative Capability of Building Information Modeling in Construction Design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(8), 04017047. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001337
Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of Bounded Rationality (Economic A). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Velasco, C., D’Agostino, R., & Reis, T. (2017, January). AM supera PE e lidera ranking de superlotação em presídios; Brasil tem 270 mil presos acima da capacidade. Portal G1.
Wesz, J. G. B., Formoso, C. T., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2018). Planning and controlling design in engineered-to-order prefabricated building systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(2), 134–152. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-02-2016-0045
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th Editio). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Beatriz Carneiro Menezes Silva; Gabriela Torres Gonçalves; Paulo de Araújo Régis; Rachel Perez Palha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
