The use of educational technologies in the birth plan for pregnant women: integrative literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25218Keywords:
Parto; Tecnología; Conducta de Elección; Pregnancy.Abstract
Objective: To analyze the scientific evidence available in the literature on the use of birth plan educational technologies with pregnant women. Methodology: This is an integrative literature review. We chose to search in Scielo, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Nursing Database, ScieVerse Scopus, PubMed. Data collection occurred from April to August 2021. The PICOT strategy was used to select the guiding question: What is the available scientific evidence on the use of technologies for birth planning among pregnant women? Inclusion criteria were scientific productions on the review theme, complete original articles, published in Portuguese, Spanish and English, without a time frame. Publications with only an abstract, without the delimitation adopted in the questioning, reflections, reviews, editorials, literature reviews, dissertations, and theses were excluded. Repeated studies were counted only once. Results: Fifteen studies were identified with evidence N1, N2, N3, N4, N6. Conclusion: The use of technologies on the birth plan with pregnant women is still incipient the Education Technology are increasingly present in everyday life such as: educational video, apps, text messages, birth plan, virtual learning object, artistic exhibition, document of refusal of procedures, web-based decisions, conversation wheel and leaflet.
References
Andrade, I. S., Castro, R. C. M. B., Moreira, K. D. A. P., Santos, C. P. R. S. D & Fernandes, A. F. C. (2019). Efeitos de tecnologia no conhecimento, atitude e prática de gestantes para o parto. Rev Rene,20, e41341. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20192041341
Bonifácio, L. P., Franzon, A. C. A., Zaratini, F. S., Vicentine, F. B., Barbosa-Júnior, F., Braga, G. C., Sanchez, J. A C., Oliveira-Ciabati, L., Andrade, M. S., Fernandes, M., Fabio, S. V., Duarte, G., Pileggi, V. N., Souza, J. P., & Vieira, E. M. (2020). PRENACEL partner - use of short message service (SMS) to encourage male involvement in prenatal care: a cluster randomized trial. Reproductive Health,17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0859-6
Franzon, A. C. A., Oliveira-Ciabati, L., Bonifácio, L. P., Vieira, E. M., Andrade, M. S., Sanchez, J. A. C., Braga, G. C., Nogueira-Pileggi, V., Fernandes, M. & Souza, JP.. (2019). Estratégia de comunicação e informação em saúde e a percepção de sentir-se preparada para o parto: ensaio aleatorizado por conglomerados (PRENACEL). Cadernos de Saúde Pública,35(10). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00111218
Gomes R. P. C., Silva R. S., Oliveira D. C. C., Manzo B. F., Guimarães G. L & Souza K. V. (2017) Plano de parto em rodas de conversa: escolhas das mulheres. REME – Rev Min Enferm. 21:e-1033.https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20170043
Kraschnewski, J. L., Chuang, C. H., Poole, E. S., Peyton, T., Blubaugh, I., Pauli, J., Feher, A. & Reddy, M. (2014). Paging “Dr. Google”: Does Technology Fill the Gap Created by the Prenatal Care Visit Structure? Qualitative Focus Group Study With Pregnant Women. Journal of Medical Internet Research,16(6), e147. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3385
Koehn, M. L. (2002). Childbirth education outcomes: an integrative review of the literature. The Journal of perinatal education, 1(3), https://doi.org/10.1624/105812402X88795
Kitzinger, S (2013). Birth plans: how are They bein used? British Journal of Midwifery. 7 (5) https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.1999.7.5.8329
Jenkinson, B., Kruske, S., Stapleton, H., Beckmann, M., Reynolds, M. & Kildea, S. (2016). Women's, midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of a structured process to document refusal of recommended maternity care.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives,29(6), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.005
Queiroz, F. F. D. S. N., Brasil, C. C. P., Silva, R. M. D., Bezerra, I. C., Collares, P. M. C. & Vasconcelos Filho, J. E. D. (2021). Avaliação do aplicativo “Gestação” na perspectiva da semiótica: o olhar das gestantes. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 26(2), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021262.41002020
Loiola, A. M. R. D., Alves, V. H., Vieira, B. D. G., Rodrigues, D. P., Souza, K. V. D. & Marchiori, GRS. (2020). Plano de parto como tecnologia do cuidado: experiência de puérperas em uma casa de parto. Cogitare Enfermagem, 25. https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v25i0.66039
Lovell H & Harris J. A (2021). Survey exploring women's use of mobile apps in labour in the United Kingdom. Midwifery, 103041, (100).
Lupton, D. (2016). The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and early motherhood: a focus group study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0971-3
Mantilla, M. J. & Di Marco, M. H. (2020). Reflexividad, autonomía y consentimiento. Un análisis de las experiencias de mujeres en la búsqueda de un parto fisiológico en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Sexualidad, Salud Y Sociedad (rio De Janeiro), 35, 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.sess.2020.35.13.a
Mendes, K. D. S., Silveira, R. C. D. C. P., & Galvão, C. M. (2008). Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem.Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem,17(4), 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-07072008000400018
Mei, J. Y., Afshar, Y., Gregory, K. D., Kilpatrick, S. J. & Esakoff, T. F. (2016). Birth Plans: What Matters for Birth Experience Satisfaction. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 43(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12226
Melnyk, B. M & Fineout- Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence practice in nursing e healthcare. A guide to best pratice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams e Wilkins; p. 25-29.
Mello, N. D. C., Góes, F. G. B., Pereira-Ávila, F. M. V, Moraes, J. R. M. M. D., Silva, L. F. D, & Silva, M. D. A. (2020). Construction and validation of an educational booklet for mobile devices on breastfeeding. Texto & Contexto – Enfermagem. 29. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2018-0492
Moraes Carrilho, J., Oliveira, I., Santos, D., Osanan, G. C., Cruz-Correia, R. J. & Reis, Z. (2019). Pregnant Users' Perceptions of the Birth Plan Interface in the "My Prenatal Care" App: Observational Validation Study. JMIR formative research, 3(1), e11374. https://doi.org/10.2196/11374
Nietsche, E. A. (2000). Tecnologia emancipatória: possibilidade ou impossibilidade para a práxis de Enfermagem? Editora UNIJUÍ.
Trigueiro, T. H., Arruda, K. A de, Santos, S. D dos, Wal, M. L., Souza, S. R. R. K & Lima, S. L de. (2022). Experiência de gestantes na consulta de Enfermagem com a construção do plano de parto. Escola Anna Nery. (26), e20210036. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2021-0036.
Santiago, R. F., Andrade, E. M. L. R., Mendes, I. A. C., Viana, M. C. A., & Nery, I. S. (2020). Avaliação de objeto virtual de aprendizagem sobre pré-natal para adolescentes grávidas na atenção básica. Acta Paulista De Enfermagem, 33. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2020ao0063
Santos, F. S. D. R., Souza, P. A. D., Lansky, S., Oliveira, B. J. D., Matozinhos, F. P., Abreu, A. L. N., Souza, K. V. D., & Pena, É. D. (2019). Os significados e sentidos do plano de parto para as mulheres que participaram da Exposição Sentidos do Nascer. Cadernos De Saúde Pública,35(6). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00143718
Shorten, A., Shorten, B., Fagerlin, A., Illuzzi, J., Kennedy, H. P., Pettker, C., Raju, D., & Whittemore, R. (2019). A Study to Assess the Feasibility of Implementing a Web-Based Decision Aid for Birth after Cesarean to Increase Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in Ethnically Diverse Settings.Journal of midwifery & women's health, 64(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12908
Silva, R. M. D., Brasil, C. C. P., Bezerra, I. C. & Queiroz, F. F. D. N. (2019). Mobile health technology for gestational care: evaluation of the GestAção's app. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem,72(suppl 3), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0641
Silva, T. M de C & Lopes, M. I. (2020). A expectativa do casal sobre o plano de parto. Revista de Enfermagem Referência ser. (2), e19095. https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV19095
Stapleton, H. (2002). Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ, 324(7338), 639–639. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639
Souza, M. T. D., Silva, M. D. D. & Carvalho, R. D. (2010). Integrative review: what is it? How to do it?. Einstein (são Paulo), 8(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134
Wise, M. R., Sadler, L., Shorten, B., van der Westhuizen, K. & Shorten, A. (2019). Birth choices for women in a 'Positive Birth after Caesarean' clinic: Randomised trial of alternative shared decision support strategies. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 59(5), 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12955
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aline Ost dos Santos; Silvana Bastos Cogo; Graciela Dutra Sehnem; Amanda Suélen Monteiro; Giovana Sangiogo Dallabrida ; Mariana Ferreira Scopel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
