Modeling popular participation in urban mobility plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25316Keywords:
Popular Participation; Urban Mobility Plan; Implementation tools of popular participation; Bass Diffusion Model; Planning.Abstract
This work modelled the elements that influence the effective popular participation in the elaboration of urban mobility plans (UMP). The modeling of the requirements was based on the theoretical methodology of ideal types defined by Ewell (1996) and Tomazette (2008), adapted to the scenario of Brazilian municipalities. The theoretical results of the requirements and the operationalization tools were presented in a mental map. The dissemination of information of popular participation in UMP was numerically simulated considering the influence of hierarchical levels. The model was tested for a case study of 3 million target audience, indicating that 100% of the popular participation would be achieved in 200 months by the traditional model, and less than 50 months by the hierarchical model. Also, the main operationalization tools for effective popular participation were studies and presented, based on the work of (Bickerstaff et al., 2002; Bobbio, 2019; Fung, 2006).
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Balbim, R. N. O. (2016). Geopolı́tica das cidades: velhos desafios, novos problemas. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada – ipea. https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/livros/livros/161005_a_geopolitica.PDF
Baquero, R. V. A. (2012). Empoderamento: instrumento de emancipação social?–uma discussão conceitual. Revista debates, 6(1), 173.
Bass, F. M. (1969). A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227–215–227. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2628128
Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., & Walker, G. (2002). Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(1), 61–73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692301000278
Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society, 38(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193
BRASIL, E. (2015). Sete Passos: Como construir um plano de mobilidade urbana.
BRASIL, M. do D. R. (2019). Cartilha de apoio à elaboração de planos de mobilidade urbana para municípios com até 100 mil habitantes. https://www.mdr.gov.br/images/stories/ArquivosSEMOB/cartilha-apoio_a_elaboracao-planos_de_mobilidade-100milhab.pdf
Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600104
Carvalho, C. H. R. de. (2016). Mobilidade Urbana: avanços, desafios e perspectivas. IPEA.
Cascetta, E., & Pagliara, F. (2013). Public Engagement for Planning and Designing Transportation Systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 87, 103–116. Elsevier B.V. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.597
Coleman, S., & Sampaio, R. C. (2017). Sustaining a democratic innovation: a study of three e-participatory budgets in Belo Horizonte. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 754–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203971
Costa, M. A. O. (2016). O Estatuto da Cidade e a Habitat III: um balanço de quinze anos da polı́tica urbana no Brasil e a nova agenda urbana. IPEA.
Elwell F. (1996). The Sociology of Max Weber. http://www.faculty.rsu.edu/~felwell/Theorists/Weber/Whome.htm.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public administration review, 66, 66–75.
Ganjeizadeh, F., Lei, H., Goraya, P., & Olivar, E. (2017). Applying Looks-like Analysis and Bass Diffusion Model Techniques to Forecast a Neurostimulator Device with No Historical Data. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1916–1924. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917305425
Ganuza, E., & Baiocchi, G. (2020). The power of ambiguity: How participatory budgeting travels the globe. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 8(2).
Gomide, A. de Á., Carvalho, C. H. R. de, Pereira, R. H. M., Lima Neto, V. C., & Galindo, E. P. (2012). A nova lei de diretrizes da Polı́tica Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana. IPEA, 27, 27–39.
Ibeas, A., dell’Olio, L., & Montequín, R. B. (2011). Citizen involvement in promoting sustainable mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 475–487. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692310000074
IBGE. (2018). Dados sobre demografia e território dos municípios brasileiros.
Kleba, M. E., & Wendausen, A. (2009). Empoderamento: processo de fortalecimento dos sujeitos nos espaços de participação social e democratização polı́tica. Saúde e sociedade, 18, 733–743.
Leite, K. D. C., Maia, M. L. A., & dos Santos, E. M. (2019). Planos de mobilidade urbana: avaliação qualitativa da participação popular em conformidade com a lei de mobilidade urbana: o caso do município de Olinda-PE.
Lilien, G. L., Rangaswamy, A., & Van den Bulte, C. (2000). Diffusion models: Managerial applications and software. New-product diffusion models, 11.
de Luca, S. (2014). Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach. Transport Policy, 33, 110–124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X14000687
Maia, A. A. (2015). Importância da audiência pública como mecanismo de participação social em projetos de transportes. Universidade de Brasília.
Portella, A. A., Pacheco, R. M. R., & Flexor, M. H. O. (2020). Participação popular no processo de elaboração do orçamento participativo. A experiência de Porto Alegre. REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS, 13(03), 1540–1571.
Quick; Kathryn S., & Zhao, Z. (2011). Suggested Design and ManagementnTechniques for Enhancing Public Engagement innTransportation Policymaking, 52. http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchReports/reportdetail.html?id=2066
Ratcliff, R., & Doshi, K. (2016). Using the Bass Model to Analyze the Diffusion of Innovations at the Base of the Pyramid. Business & Society, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313479529
Rolnik, R., Pinheiro, O. M., & others. (2004). Plano Diretor Participativo: guia para elaboração pelos municı́pios e cidadãos. Ministério das Cidades.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
Sewell, Wrderrick Phillips, S. U. S. A. N. D. (1979). Models for the evaluation of public participation programmes. Natural Resources Journal, 19(2), 337–358. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24881695
de Sousa Santos, B. V. (1998). Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy. Politics & Society, 26(4), 461–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329298026004003
Spencer, C. S. (1998). A Mathematical Model of Primary State Formation. Cultural Dynamics, 10(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/092137409801000101
Spencer, C. S. (2014). Modeling the evolution of bureaucracy: Political-economic reach and administrative complexity. Social Evolution and History, 13(1), 42–66.
Tomazette, M. (2008). A contribuição metodológica de Max Weber para a pesquisa em ciências sociais. Universitas Jus, 1.
Wagner, J. (2013). Measuring Performance of Public Engagement in Transportation Planning: Three Best Principles. Transportation Research Record, 2397(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.3141/2397-05
Wahl, C. (2013). Swedish municipalities and public participation in the traffic planning process – Where do we stand? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50, 105–112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856413000190
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Adilson Fernandes Indi; Edwin Francisco Ferreira Silva; Augusto Cesar Brasil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
