Procurement management of strategic inputs in coping with COVID-19: scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26233Keywords:
Biomedical technology; Public procurement; Scoping review; COVID 19.Abstract
The health crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged public management in several countries to ensure the timely and efficient procurement of the various health technologies necessary to cope with it, such as medicines, diagnostic tests, personal protective equipment (PPE) and medical materials/equipment, among others. This article introduces a protocol for a scoping review that aims to map and synthesize studies portraying the management capacity related to public procurement of inputs used in coping with the crisis arising from COVID-19. The protocol is intended to document the processes involved in the methodological planning and execution of a scoping review guided by Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and developed using the 2015 PRISMA-Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. The PCC strategy (population, concept and context) systematized the search for studies published in MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and WHO-COVID-19 (Global literature on coronavirus disease), as well as in the gray literature, by September 2021. The selection of articles will be carried out in two steps (titles and abstracts, followed by the assessment of the full text of the articles), by two independent reviewers, with the resolution of disagreements by a third reviewer. The results will be analyzed qualitatively/quantitatively and will be organized by themes. The checklist present in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to guide the final review report. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework under the number 10.17605/OSF.IO/W6KHY.
References
Alves, H. J. de P., Fernandes, F. A., Lima, K. P. de, Batista, B. D. de O., & Fernandes, T. J. (2020). A pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil: Uma aplicação do método de clusterização k-means. Research, Society and Development, 9(10), e5829109059. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9059
Amaya, A. B., & De Lombaerde, P. (2021). Regional cooperation is essential to combatting health emergencies in the Global South. Globalization and Health, 17(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00659-7
Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005a). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005b). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (Editors). (2020). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
Atkinson, C. L., McCue, C., Prier, E., & Atkinson, A. M. (2020). Supply Chain Manipulation, Misrepresentation, and Magical Thinking During the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020942055
Cohen, J., & Rodgers, Y. V. D. M. (2020). Contributing factors to personal protective equipment shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventive Medicine, 141 (106263). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106263
Ehrich, K., & Freeman, G. K. (2002). How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care. Research Policy and Planning 20(1), 25-29. Retrieved from http://ssrg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/rpp201/shortreport1.pdf
Gaudette, E. (2020). COVID-19’s Limited Impact on Drug Shortages in Canada. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques, 46, S307–S312. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2020-107
Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., & Parker, D. (2016). An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 13(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12144
Morris, MSc, M., Boruff, MLIS, J. T., & Gore, MLIS, G. C. (2017). Scoping reviews: Establishing the role of the librarian. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2016.156
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Nyanchoka, L., Tudur-Smith, C., Thu, V. N., Iversen, V., Tricco, A. C., & Porcher, R. (2019). A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 109, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.005
Osorio-de-Castro, C. G. S., Luiza, V. L., Castilho, S. R. de, Oliveira, M. A., & Jaramillo, N. M. (2014). Assistência Farmacêutica: Gestão e prática para profissionais de saúde. (1º ed). Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.
Schmidt, F. de H., & Assis, L. R. S. de. (2011). O Estado como cliente: Características das firmas industriais fornecedoras do governo. Boletim Radar: Tecnologia, Produção e Comércio Exterior - IPEA. http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/5355/1/Radar_n17_O%20Estado.pdf
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & the PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349(jan02 1), g7647–g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Silva, L. L. S. da, Lima, A. F. R., Polli, D. A., Razia, P. F. S., Pavão, L. F. A., Cavalcanti, M. A. F. de H., & Toscano, C. M. (2020). Medidas de distanciamento social para o enfrentamento da COVID-19 no Brasil: Caracterização e análise epidemiológica por estado. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 36(9), e00185020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00185020
Teremetskyi, V., Duliba, Y., Kroitor, V., Korchak, N., & Makarenko, O. (2021). Corruption and strengthening anti-corruption efforts in healthcare during the pandemic of Covid-19. Medico-Legal Journal, 89(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817220971925
Thai, K. V. (2001). Public procurement re-examined. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 9–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-01-01-2001-B001
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med., 169, 467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
World Health Organization. (2021). Brazil: WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard With Vaccination Data. https://covid19.who.int
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rondineli Mendes da Silva; Rosangela Caetano; Vera Lucia Luiza; Daniela Moulin Maciel de Vasconcelos; Luisa Arueira Chaves; Leandro Oliveira Paranhos; Angelúcia Muniz; Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio-de-Castro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
