Women with disabilities and motherhood experience: scoping review protocol

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26755

Keywords:

Disabled persons; Women's health; Reproductive rights; Protocols.

Abstract

Context: Motherhood presents itself as an event which different meanings can be attributed according to the moment and who is involved with this experience. Historically, the required forms of care that relapse on women follow a pattern of norms that vary according to the culture which they are inserted. In the Brazilian context, a series of expectations about what is a good mother, at what age to have children and other surveillance norms. However, for women with disabilities there are other “marks”, like the prejudice. Objective: Present the steps that will be followed and describe the path taken to prepare a scope review, whose emphasis will be on mapping the knowledge about the reality of women wiht disabilities who experience motherhood and to what extent reproductive rights are considered. Method: A scope review will be conducted as recommended at the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). We will follow the following steps in the research: formulation of the question; identification of relevant studies; selection of studies; data extraction; separation, summarization and reporting of results. Results: Results will be published. Conclusion: We hope to map knowledge and identify gaps in order to guide further research in the area.

References

Alves, G. M. G, Almeida, A. G. C. S., Licetti, M. M., Costa, C. M. O. & Araújo, K. C. G. M. (2021). Relevância do grau de incapacidade física como preditor de diagnóstico tardio em hanseníase: uma revisão de escopo. Research, Society and Development. 10(6), e5410615399. 10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15399. https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15399.

Arksey, H. & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Belo, L. C. O. & Filho, P. O. (2018). Maternidade marcada: o estigma de ser mãe com deficiência visual. Saúde Soc. São Paulo, 27(3), 957-967. 10.1590/S0104-12902018147798

Brasil (2011). Convenção sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência: Protocolo Facultativo à Convenção sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência: decreto legislativo nº 186, de 09 de julho de 2008: decreto nº 6.949, de 25 de agosto de 2009. 4.ed., rev. e atual. – Brasília: Secretaria de Direitos Humanos, Secretaria Nacional de Promoção dos Direitos da Pessoa com Deficiência. https://sisapidoso.icict.fiocruz.br/sites/sisapidoso.icict.fiocruz.br/files/convencaopessoascomdeficiencia.pdf.

Breckenridge, J. P., Devaney, J., Kroll, T., Lazenbatt, A., Taylor, J., & Bradbury-Jones, C. (2014). Access and utilisation of maternity care for disabled women who experience domestic abuse: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14(234). 10.1186/1471-2393-14-234.

Clímaco, J.C. (2020). Análise das construções possíveis de maternidades nos estudos feministas e da deficiência. Revista Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis, 28 (1). doi:10.1590/1806-9584.

Constantino, C., Luiz, K. G., Costa, L. M. L., Silveira, T. B. H., & Bernardes, V. (Org). (2020). Guia “Mulheres com Deficiência: Garantia de Direitos para Exercício da Cidadania”. Coletivo Feminista Helen Keller. https://www.crmpr.org.br/uploadAddress/Guia-Feminista-Helen-Keller[4447].pdf.

Diniz, D. (2007). O que é deficiência.: Brasiliense.

Galvão, A. L. M., Oliveira, E., Germani, A. C. C. G., & Luiz, O. C. (2021). Determinantes estruturais da saúde, raça, gênero e classe social: uma revisão de escopo. Saude soc., 30 (2). 10.1590/S0104-12902021200743

Gesser, M. & Fietz, H. (2021). Ética do cuidado e a experiência da deficiência: uma entrevista com Eva Feder Kittay. Revista Estudos Feministas, 29(2): e64987. 10.1590/1806-9584

Joana Briggs Institute (JBI). (2022). JBI Manual for evidence synthesis. https://jbi.global/scoping-review-network/resources.

Malouf, R., Redshaw, M., Kurinczuk, J.J., & Gray, R. (2014). Systematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 5(14):58. 10.1186/1471-2393-14-58.

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2020a) Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Disponível em: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020b). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth, 8(10):2119-2126. 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.

Silva, A. B., Sindico, S. R. F., Carneiro, A. C., Henrique, S. M., Fernandes, A. G., Gomes, J. P., Marinho, T. P., & Fernandes, V. R. (2021). COVID-19 Remote Consultation Services and Population in Health Inequity-Concentrating Territories: A Scoping Review. Telemed J E Health. 27(8):881-897. 10.1089/tmj.2021.0145.

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., & et al (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med, 169 (7):467–473. 10.7326/M18-0850

Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. NYU Press.

Vidal, E. I. O., & Fukushima, F. B. (2021). A arte e a ciência de escrever um artigo científico de revisão. Cad. Saúde Pública, 37(4), e00063121. 10.1590/0102-311X00063121

World Health Organization (WHO). (2012). Relatório mundial sobre a deficiência, The World Bank; tradução Lexicus Serviços Lingüísticos. São Paulo: SEDPcD. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44575/9788564047020_por.pdf?sequence=4

Published

25/03/2022

How to Cite

MORAIS, F. R. C. .; CONSTANCIO , D. F.; COSTA, L. M. de L.; MOREIRA, M. C. N. Women with disabilities and motherhood experience: scoping review protocol . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. e52511426755, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26755. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26755. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences