The implication of reversal burden proof on corruption criminal act
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2844Keywords:
Implications; Reversal of the burden of proof; Judge's decision.Abstract
The polemic of the ratification of KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) Constitution indicated the good intentions of government as well as people in society through their respective perceptions which in conclusion whether the KPK is getting stronger or become weaker. The aim of this analysis is to examine on the implication of reversal burden proof system on corruption criminal act in Indonesian Law. Reversal of the burden proof as determined in the PTPK Law and the 2003 KAK Law leaves problems in its implementation, through normative legal research with the study of laws and comparisons, something new is obtained which is a guideline for judges in giving verdicts regarding the results of verification of assets and actions. Implications of proven or unproven acts and assets of the defendant through reversing the burden of proof of criminal criminal behavior which is greatly affects the received sanction by the defendant which include imprisonment penalties, criminal sanctions for fines and additional criminal sanctions in the form of returning state financial losses.
References
A Djoko, S. (2009). Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Pengembalian Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
Arief, B. N. (2005). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
CNN Indonesia. (2019). Kasus Suap, Hakim Tipikor PN Medan Divonis 6 Tahun Penjara. Retrieved from CNN Indonesia website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190516204734-12-395579/kasus-suap-hakim-tipikor-pn-medan-divonis-6-tahun-penjara
M, S. (2003). Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana Ide Dasar Double Track System & Implementasinya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marzuki, S. (n.d.). Penegak Hukum Penuh Aib dan Drama.
Sumaryanto, D. (2019). Harmonisasi pembalikan beban pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.28.2.108-122
Waluyo, A. (2013). Pengadilan Vonis Jenderal Djoko Susilo 10 Tahun Penjara. Retrieved from VOA Indonesia website: https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pengadilan-vonis-jenderal-djoko-susilo-10-tahun-penjara/1742371.html
Zhacky, M. (2018). 7 Kepala Daerah yang Dihukum Penjara Karena Korupsi di Tahun 2018. Retrieved from detikNews website: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4333251/7-kepala-daerah-yang-dihukum-penjara-karena-korupsi-di-tahun-2018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
