Recommendations for education with patient simulation in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30894Keywords:
Patient Simulation; Simulation Technique; Education Higher; Education.Abstract
Objective: To present recommendations for the use of simulated patients in higher education. Methodology: This is a Scoping review according to The Joanna Brigs Institute, carried out in the Latin American Literature in Health Sciences and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online databases, and in the Scientific Electronic Library Online electronic library through the online platform. CAPES journals. Original articles were included, and review, reflection or articles that did not meet the objective were excluded. The data search and selection process was described in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyzes flow. Result: 557 studies were identified, of these six articles met the study criteria, two national and four international, published between 2010 and 2019. The recommendations refer to (1) the characterization of the simulated patient and (2) the simulation script and simulated patient training. Conclusions: Therefore, educational institutions must adopt them in the teaching-learning process.
References
Andrea J., & Kotowski P. (2017). Using Standardized Patients in an Undergraduate Nursing Health Assessment Class. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 13(7):309-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.05.003.
Baig L. A., Beran T. N., Vallevand A., Baig Z. A., & Monroy-Cuadros M. (2014). Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: Results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations. BMC Medical Education. 14(97):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-97.
Bonamigo E. L., & Destefani A. S. (2010). Dramatization as teaching strategy during medical training on how to communicate bad news to patient. Revista Bioética. [Internet]. 18(3):725-742. https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/view/596/619.
Brandão C. F. S., & Cecilio-Fernandes D. (2018). Importance and challenges of simulation training in healthcare. Sci Med. 28(1):ID30102. http://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.1.30102.
Cantillon P., Stewart B., Haeck K., Bills J., Ker J., & Rethans J. J. (2010). Simulated patient programmes in Europe: collegiality or separate development? Med Teach. 32(3):e106-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903389090.
Carneiro K. K. C., Filho I. M. M., Santos O. P., Arantes A. A., Félis K. C., & Guilhermes I. S. (2019). Simulação realística como instrumento no processo de ensino-aprendizagem de enfermagem. REVISA. [8(3):273-84 https://doi.org/10.36239/revisa.v8.n3.p273a284.
Chagas M., Pereira-Ávila F., Góes F., Salvo G., Silva R., & Coutinho V. (2020). Avaliação do debriefing na simulação clínica no ensino em enfermagem. Enferm. Foco. 11(4): 153-160. https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2020.v11.n3.2854
Esteves L. S. F., Cunha I. C. K. O., Bohomol E., & Negri E. C. (2018). Supervised internship in undergraduate education in nursing: integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 71(Suppl 4):1740-50. [Thematic issue: Education and teaching in Nursing]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0340.
Ferreira I., Pires Porto R., Alex Evaldt S., & Hastenpflug Wottrich S. (2020). A importância do paciente simulado na formação médica: um relato de experiência. SIEPE [Internet]. 11(1). https://periodicos.unipampa.edu.br/index.php/SIEPE/article/view/87186.
Fineout-Overholt E., & Stillwell S. B. (2011). Asking compelling questions. In: Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, editors. Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: a guide to best practice [forthcoming]. (2nd ed.), Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 656p.
Ha E. (2018). Experience of nursing students with standardized patients in simulation based learning: Q-methodology study. Nurse Education Today. 66:123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.023
Himmelbauer M., Seitz T., Seidman C., & Löffler-Stastka H. (2018). Standardized patients in psychiatry - the best way to learn clinical skills? BMC Med Educ. 18(72):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1184-4.
Kaneko, R. M. U., & Lopes M. H. B. M. (2019). Cenário em simulação realística em saúde: o que é relevante para a sua elaboração?* Rev. esc. enferm. USP[Internet]. 53:e03453. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2018015703453.
Kowitlawakul Y., Chow Y. L., Salam Z. H. A., & Ignacio, J. (2015). Exploring the use of standardized patients for simulation-based learning in preparing advanced practice nurses. Nurse Education Today. 35(7):894-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.004
Lippe M. E., & Hudson S. (2017). Communication Simulation Using Laypersons as Standardized Patients. Nurse Educator. 43(2):E5-E6. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000459.
Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., & Altman D. G. The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Moore P., Leighton M. I., Alvarado C., & Bralic C. (2016). Pacientes simulados enformación de profesionales de la salud: el lado humano de simulación. Rev. méd. Chile. 144(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872016000500010.
Moraes B. A., & Costa N. M. S. C. (2016). Understanding the curriculum the light of training guiding health in Brazil. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 50(nesp):9-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420160000300002.
Moreira C. O. F., & Dias M. S. A. (2015). Diretrizes Curriculares na saúde e as mudanças nos modelos de saúde e de educação. ABCS Health Sci. 40(3):300-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.v40i3.811.
Motola I., Devine L. A., Chung H. S., Sullivan J. E., & Issenberg S. B. (2013). Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. MedTeach. 35(10):e1511-e1530. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632.
Negri E. C.,Mazzo A., Martins J. C. A., Pereira Junior G. A., Almeida R. G. S., & Pedersoli C. E. (2017). Clinical simulation with dramatization: gains perceived by students and health professionals. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 02(25): e2916. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1807.2916.
Passos G. M. (2016). A importância do paciente simulado como recurso pedagógico na formação do médico. Revista UNILUS Ensino e Pesquisa. [Internet]. 13(33):21-27. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-IMPORTANCIA-DO-PACIENTE-SIMULADO-COMO-RECURSO-NA-Passos/88c8c02e80e2ca4d51536449b42636566a421c16.
Peters M. D. J., Godfrey C. M., McInerney P., Soares C. B., Khalil H., Parker D. (2015). The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/Reviewers-Manual_Methodology-for-JBI-Scoping-Reviews_2015_v2.pdf.
Pritchard S. A., Blackstock F. C., Keating J. L., Nestel D. (2017). The pillars of well-constructed simulated patient programs: A qualitative study with experienced educators. MedTeach. 39(11):1159-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1369015.
Rodrigues F. L., Moura L. M., Boeckmann L. M. M., Melo M. C., França F. C. V., & Sant’Ana G.(2019). Avaliação do processo ensino-aprendizagem no ambiente de simulação realística na graduação em enfermagem. Enferm. Foco. 10(6): 118-124. Disponível em:https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2019.v10.n6.2782
Sarmasoglu S., Dinc L., & Elc M. (2016). Using Standardized Patients in Nursing Education Effects on Students’ Psychomotor Skill Development. Nurse Educ. 41(2):E1-E5. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000188.
Schwelle M., Ribeiro D. L., Passeri S. R., Wanderley J. S, & Carvalho-Filho M. A. (2018). Simulated medical consultations with standardized patients: In-depth debriefing based on dealing with emotions. Rev Bras Educ Med. 42(1):82-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-52712018v42n1RB20160089.
Seabra A. L. C., Paiva K. .C M., & Luz T. R. (2015). Managerial competences of coordinators of undergraduate nursing courses. Rev Bras Enferm. 68(5):608-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2015680518i.
Silva V. B., & Moraes V. R. (2015). O miniOSCE como instrumento de avaliação formativa dos estudantes do curso de graduação em enfermagem. Indagatio Didactica. 7(3):38-48. https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v7i3.2833.
Siqueira-Batista R., Gomes A. P., Albuquerque V. S., Cavalcanti F. O. L., & Cotta R. M. M. (2013). Educação e competências para o SUS: é possível pensar alternativas às lógicas do capitalismo tardio. Revista Ciências e Saúde Coletiva. 18(1):159-170. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/csc/v18n1/17.pdf.
Turan S., Üner S. B., & Elçin M. (2009). The impact of standardized patients’ feedback on the students’ motivational levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences1(1):9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.006
Whittemore R., & Knafl K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 52(5):546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Juscinaide Henrique Alves; Angélica Pereira de Oliveira; Josefa Fernanda Evangelista de Lacerda; Lorita Marlena Freitag Pagliuca; Evanira Rodrigues Maia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
