Assessment of the level of knowledge of the multiprofessional team about the use of the speech valve in tracheostomized children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31409Keywords:
Speech valve; Tracheostomy; Babies; Access to health technology.Abstract
Objective: To analyze the knowledge on speech valve of the multidisciplinary team of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Santa Casa in tracheostomized children. Method: A quantitative research was carried out, with a prospective study of an applied nature, with an exploratory objective, field research modality, with 91 professionals working in two Pediatric ICUs at Santa Casa. The research started with an integrative review on the benefits of the talking valve, to follow with the application of a questionnaire to health professionals about the knowledge of the talking valve. Results: After analyzing the results, it was found that most professionals had insufficient knowledge about the speech valve, 57.2% have insufficient knowledge when asked if they know the speech valve, 72.6% do not effectively understand the handling and 51.7% do not understand effectively about the benefits. As for the percentage of correct answers about the use of the speech valve in 5 statements, the majority got three wrong statements. A large number of the sample, 97.8% agreed that training for the multidisciplinary team would be relevant. Conclusion: Considering the result regarding the little knowledge associated with the speech valve among the research participants, it is suggested to build an educational technology to contribute to the multiprofessional team, provide access to information in an attractive, fast and effective way, minimizing the risks of erroneous action at the time of patient care with the adapted valve.
References
Abreu, A. P. S., Saraty, S. B., Monte, L., Araújo, A. C., Nunes, S. F., Santos, V. R. C., Trindade, C. B. S., & Neves, C. M. (2021). Benefícios da válvula fonatória em crianças traqueostomizadas: uma revisão integrativa. Pesquisa, Sociedade e Desenvolvimento.10(13), e421101321503.
Araújo, N. R. S., & Laburum, C. E. (2009). Uma análise da validação e confiabilidade da escala de opiniões da seleção de experimentos de química (EOSEQ). Ens. pesquisa Educ. Cienc. 11(2), e 199-220.
Avelino, M. A., Maunsell, R., Valera, F. C. P., Lubianca, P. N., José, F., & Schweiger, C. (2017). First clinical consensus and national recomendations on tracheostomized children of the Brazilian academy of pediatric otorhinolaryngology and Brazilian society of pediatrics. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 83(5), e498-506.
Al-Samri, M., Mithell,I., Drumond, D. S., & Bjornson, C. (2010). Tracheostomy in children: a population-based experience over 17 years. Pediatr Pulmonol. 45(5), e487-93.
Barros, A., Portas, J., & Queija, D. (2009). Implicações da traqueostomia na comunicação e na deglutição. Artigo de revisão Rev.bras. cir.cabeça e pescoço.38(3),e202-207.
Brasil, Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira (Amib). https://www.amib.org.br/noticia/nid/fonoaudiologia-na-uti-e-fundamental-no-processo-de-recuperacao-do-paciente-critico/
Brasil Ministério da Saúde, Agência nacional de vigilância sanitária. RDC nº7 de 24 de fevereiro de 2010. (2010). https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2010/res0007_24_02_2010.html
Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, Banco de dados do Sistema Único de Saúde-Datasus (2021) Disponível em http://www.datasus.gov.br
Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466. Ministro Alexandre Rocha Santos Padilho, Brasília, DF. https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf.
Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução n°580. Ministro Gilberto Occhi. Brasília, DF. (2018). https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2018/Reso580.pdf
Brasil, Santa Casa de Misericórdia do Pará. (2019). Relatório impresso de indicadores da Santa Casa de Misericórdia do Pará.
Brasil, Senado Federal. https://www12.senado.leg.br/radio/1/noticia/2021/10/28/senado-aprova-criacao-do-dia-nacional-da-crianca-traqueostomia (2021).
Brasil, SUS, Centro colaborador do Sus –Cates. Disponível em: http://www.ccates.org.br/areas-tematicas/avaliacao-de-tecnologias-em-saude/, acessado em 2 de fevereiro de 2022.
Dal’astra, A. P. L., Quirino, A. V., Caixêta, J. A. S., & Avelino, M. A. G. (2017). Tracheostomy in childhood: review of the literature on complications and mortality over the last three decades. Braz J Otorhinolaryngology, 83(2), e207-214.
Garcia, T. F. (2017). Influência da válvula de fala no desmame da ventilação mecânica e no tempo de traqueostomia: Uma revisão da literatura. Dissertação (mestrado ao programa aprimoramento profissional)- Faculdade de medicina de Ribeirão Preto, SP.
Lima, J. A. C., Collete, N., Baggio, M. A., & Almeida, A. M. (2021). Aleitamento materno na experiência de mães de crianças traqueostomizadas e o uso da válvula de fala Passy-Muir. Esc. Anna Nery Ver. Enferm, 25(3), e20200290
Medeiros, G. C., Sassi, F. C., Silva, L. L., & Andrade, C. R. F. (2019). Criteria for tracheostomy decanulation: literarture review. Codas, 24, e2103.
Nascimento, M. H. M., & Teixeira, E. (2018). Educational technology to mediate care of the“kangaroo family” in the neonata.l unit. Rev. bras. enferm. (Online), 71(3), e1290-7.
Pereira,A. S,Shitsuka,D. M., Parreira,F. J., & Shitsuka,R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. 1ªedição.Santa Maria,Rs:UFSM. Disponível em: https://www.ufsm.br/app/uploads/sites/358/2019/02/Metodologia-da-Pesquisa-Cientifica_final.pdf
Santana, L., Fernades, A., Brasileiro, A. G., & Abreu, A. C. (2014). Criteria for clinical speech pathology evaluation of tracheostomized patient in hospital and home. Rev. cefac,16(2), e524-536.
Speed. L., & Harding K. E. (2013). Tracheostomy teams reduce total tracheostomy time and increase speaking valve use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Critical Care, 28(216),e1-216.e10.
Watters, K. F. (2017). Tracheostomy in infants and children. Respir Care, 62(6), e799-825.
Zabih, W., Holler, T., Syed, F., Russel, L., Allegro, J., & Amim, R. (2017). The use of speakinh valves children with tracheostomy tubes. Respiratory care, 62(12), e1594-1601.
Zanotto, F. P. (2020). Hipóteses de pesquisa:nulas e alternativas? Escrever ciência. Recuperado de: https://www.escreverciencia.com/post/hip%C3%B3teses-de-pesquisa-nulas-e-alternativas
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Andréa Pinheiro dos Santos Abreu; Xaene Maria Fernandes Duarte Mendonça; Paulo Eduardo Santos Ávila; Heliana Helena de Moura Nunes; Aureni Cícera de Araújo; Lindinalva Brasil Monte; Déborah Tatiane Pinheiro dos Santos Costa; Carla Manuela Almeida das Neves; Salma Brito Saraty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
