Surgery-First Approach in Orthognathic surgery: Literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35093

Keywords:

Orthognathic Surgery; Quality of life; Treatment time.

Abstract

The early benefit protocol in orthognathic surgery or surgery-first approach (SFA) has as its main idea the surgical approach before previous orthodontic preparation, in contrast to the idea of ​​the traditional approach, which advocates a preoperative orthodontic treatment, which may present more uncomfortable for the patient when compared to surgery-first because it takes a very long time, discomfort during the orthodontic treatment, and the patient may present psychosocial problems related to the delay in the resolution of the main complaint and/or even the aggravation of such complaint due to attenuation of facial asymmetry resulting from the correct position of the teeth in the arches, and possible intra-oral complications related to hygiene and oral health with the use of intra-oral orthosis. The surgery-first approach is based on initially improving facial aesthetics, which is usually the patient's main complaint, and then moving on to the second stage of occlusal movement and alignment. This literature review aims to evaluate and compare the findings regarding the conventional protocol. and the suggestion-first protocol. A MEDLINE search. Inclusion criteria were 1) human study and 2) orthognathic surgery with surgical-first approach or equivalent, and 3) three-dimensional planning with virtual flow in a suggestion-first approach. After an evaluation of the contemporary literature, it was concluded that this approach is positive when related to treatment time, patient's quality of life, post-surgical orthodontic time and occlusal stability. Overall, the SFA achieved optimal results comparable to the conventional protocol regarding treatment success.

References

Adeni, M. K., Sanjana, M., Khan, N., Vijayalakshmi, D., Parameswaran, R., & Parameswaran, A. (2021). Surgery-First Approach: A Boon for Periodontally Compromised Patients - A Case Report. Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 11(2), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_436_20

Bell, W. H., & Creekmore, T. D. (1973). Surgical-orthodontic correction of mandibular prognathism. American journal of orthodontics, 63(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(73)90351-5

Choi, J. W., & Lee, J. Y. (2021). Current concept of the surgery-first orthognathic approach. Archives of plastic surgery, 48(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01305

Dehghani, M., Fazeli, F., & Sattarzadeh, A. P. (2017). Efficiency and Duration of Orthodontic/Orthognathic Surgery Treatment. The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 28(8), 1997–2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.000000000000416511.

Hernández-Alfaro, F., Guijarro-Martínez, R., & Peiró-Guijarro, M. A. (2014). Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: what have we learned? A comprehensive workflow based on 45 consecutive cases. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 72(2), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.01319.

Jeong, W. S., Lee, J. Y., & Choi, J. W. (2017). Large-Scale Study of Long-Term Anteroposterior Stability in a Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach Without Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment. The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 28(8), 2016–2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003853

Kim, J. Y., Park, J. H., Jung, H. D., & Jung, Y. S. (2020). Factors Affecting Total Treatment Time in Patients Treated with Orthognathic Surgery Using the Surgery-First Approach: Multivariable Analysis Using 3D CT and Scanned Dental Casts. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(3), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030641

Ko, E. W., Hsu, S. S., Hsieh, H. Y., Wang, Y. C., Huang, C. S., & Chen, Y. R. (2011). Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 69(5), 1469–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022

Ko, E. W., Lin, S. C., Chen, Y. R., & Huang, C. S. (2013). Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 71(5), e215–e223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.12.025

Lee W. (2018). Corticotomy for orthodontic tooth movement. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 44(6), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.251

Liou, E. J., Chen, P. H., Wang, Y. C., Yu, C. C., Huang, C. S., & Chen, Y. R. (2011). Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 69(3), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011

Liou, E. J., Chen, P. H., Wang, Y. C., Yu, C. C., Huang, C. S., & Chen, Y. R. (2011). Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 69(3), 781–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.035

Oueis, R., Waite, P. D., Wang, J., & Kau, C. H. (2020). Orthodontic-Orthognathic Management of a patient with skeletal class II with bimaxillary protrusion, complicated by vertical maxillary excess: A multi-faceted case report of difficult treatment management issues. International orthodontics, 18(1), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.09.002

Pelo, S., Gasparini, G., Garagiola, U., Cordaro, M., Di Nardo, F., Staderini, E., Patini, R., de Angelis, P., D'Amato, G., Saponaro, G., & Moro, A. (2017). Surgery-first orthognathic approach vs traditional orthognathic approach: Oral health-related quality of life assessed with 2 questionnaires. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 152(2), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.022

Shah, Y. A., Deshmukh, S. V., & Patil, A. S. (2017). Surgery-first Approach. World J Dent8 (4):343-350. https://10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1462

Sharma, V. K., Yadav, K., & Tandon, P. (2015). An overview of surgery-first approach: Recent advances in orthognathic surgery. Journal of orthodontic science, 4(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.149609

Trauner, R., & Obwegeser, H. (1957). The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology. 10(7), 677-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-4220(57)80063-2

Uribe, F., Adabi, S., Janakiraman, N., Allareddy, V., Steinbacher, D., Shafer, D., & Villegas, C. (2015). Treatment duration and factors associated with the surgery-first approach: a two-center study. Progress in orthodontics, 16, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0101-1

Uribe, F. A., & Farrell, B. (2020). Surgery-First Approach in the Orthognathic Patient. Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America, 32(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.009

Worms, F. W., Isaacson, R. J., & Speidel, T. M. (1976). Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. The Angle orthodontist, 46(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1976)046<0001:SOTPPA>2.0.CO;2

Downloads

Published

04/10/2022

How to Cite

NAZARÉ, G. H. V. de; GODOI, D. F. C. .; ZACARIAS, V. L. B.; GONÇALVES, C. A. de J. O.; CARNEIRO, M. N. Surgery-First Approach in Orthognathic surgery: Literature review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 13, p. e173111335093, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35093. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35093. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 13

Section

Health Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Henrique Vieira de Nazaré; Daniel Ferreira Cândido Godoi; Victor Luiz Barbosa Zacarias; Carlos Augusto de Jesus Oliveira Gonçalves; Marcelo Newton Carneiro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.