Impact of Instagram in the influence on esthetic perception in silhouettes through eye tracking and questionnaire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35156Keywords:
Eye tracking; Visual perception; Esthetics; Silhouettes.Abstract
This study evaluated the influence of the use of Instagram in the esthetic of silhouettes of individuals who underwent orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty of four different models separated as preoperative, after orthognathic surgery, and after orthognathic rhinoplasty were standardized and edited using Photoshop. OGAMA software and EyeTribe hardware were used for eye tracking. The Qualtrics platform was used to apply the Brief Symptoms Inventory (BSI) questionnaires to assess psychological statuses and use of social media and to evaluate the attractiveness of each image through the visual analog scale (VAS). ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and Pearson's correlation tests were used. Statistically significant differences for time to the first fixation in the lower third, and middle third for attractiveness were observed (p < 0.05). The VAS results were more attractive after orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty. Pearson's correlation was performed between time spent on Instagram and VAS (p < 0.0001, r = -0.212); individuals who reported spending more time on Instagram gave lower attractiveness scores. In addition, VAS showed significance in relation to BSI global indices (general severity index [p = 0.044, r = -0.078], positive symptom total [p = 0.024, r = -0.08] and positive symptom distress index [p = 0.025, r = -0.08]), suggesting that individuals who scored better tended to assign higher scores to attractiveness. Individuals who reported spending more time on Instagram tended to rate the silhouettes’ attractiveness with lower scores, and individuals who spent more time on Instagram displayed a higher average level of distress.
References
Abi-Jaoude, E., Naylor, K. T., & Pignatiello, A. (2020). Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health. Cmaj, 192(6), E136-E141.
Berryman, C., Ferguson, C. J., & Negy, C. (2018). Social media use and mental health among young adults. Psychiatric quarterly, 89(2), 307-314.
Brucoli, M., Baena, R. R. Y., Boffano, P., & Benech, A. (2019). Psychological profiles in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery or rhinoplasty: a preoperative and preliminary comparison. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 23(2), 179-186.
Cha, S.-S., & Seo, B.-K. (2018). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction in middle school students in Korea: Prevalence, social networking service, and game use. Health Psychology Open, 5(1), 2055102918755046.
Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). “Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review”: Corrigendum.
Davidenko, N. (2007). Silhouetted face profiles: A new methodology for face perception research. Journal of Vision, 7(4), 6-6.
Feinstein, B. A., Hershenberg, R., Bhatia, V., Latack, J. A., Meuwly, N., & Davila, J. (2013). Negative social comparison on Facebook and depressive symptoms: Rumination as a mechanism. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(3), 161.
Guimaraes, L. K., Gasparello, G. G., Pithon, M. M., Bark, M. J., Mota Junior, S. L., & Tanaka, O. M. (2022). Visual perception of repaired cleft lip scarring face associated with different malocclusions via eye-tracking. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 16(1), 45-52.
Hassan, M. G., & Kapila, S. (2022). Using Twitter to promote #orthodontic research and clinical innovations: Practice and challenges. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 161(4), 490-496.
Huang, P., Cai, B., Zhou, C., Wang, W., Wang, X., Gao, D., et al. (2019). Contribution of the mandible position to the facial profile perception of a female facial profile: An eye-tracking study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 156(5), 641-652.
Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Johnson, B. (2013). Development and validation of a social media use integration scale. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 38-50.
Jiang, Z., Tan, L., Hu, L., Wang, C., Wang, H., & Xie, Z. (2018). Clinician, dental student, and orthognathic patient perception of black-and-white silhouette lateral profile dimensions of ideal chin position in a Chinese population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 125(1), e1-e7.
Kim, S. H., Hwang, S., Hong, Y.-J., Kim, J.-J., Kim, K.-H., & Chung, C. J. (2018). Visual attention during the evaluation of facial attractiveness is influenced by facial angles and smile. The Angle Orthodontist, 88(3), 329-337.
Maple, J. R., Vig, K. W., Beck, F. M., Larsen, P. E., & Shanker, S. (2005). A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128(6), 690-696; quiz 801.
Marchant, A., Hawton, K., Stewart, A., Montgomery, P., Singaravelu, V., Lloyd, K., et al. (2017). A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: The good, the bad and the unknown. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0181722.
Martins, C. M., Lacerda, P. B. G., Maenosono, R. M., Catelan, V., & Batista, V. E. S. (2021). Perception of smile attractiveness by dentistry professionals, dental students and laypeople before and after esthetic procedures. Research, Society and Development, 10, e50010313690.
Matar Boumosleh, J., & Jaalouk, D. (2017). Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university students-A cross sectional study. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182239.
Moulton, S. J., Gullyas, C., Hogg, F. J., & Power, K. G. (2018). Psychosocial predictors of body image dissatisfaction in patients referred for NHS aesthetic surgery. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 71(2), 149-154.
Naini, F. B., Donaldson, A. N., McDonald, F., & Cobourne, M. T. (2012). Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 41(7), 839-846.
Pan, P.-Y., & Yeh, C.-B. (2018). Internet addiction among adolescents may predict self-harm/suicidal behavior: a prospective study. The Journal of pediatrics, 197, 262-267.
Rezaei, N., Abbasi, H., Khaksar, A., & Golshah, A. (2021). Effects of deviations in the nose and chin prominence on facial attractiveness. Journal of Orthodontics, 48(2), 135-143.
Rivera, S. M., Hatch, J. P., & Rugh, J. D. (2000). Psychosocial factors associated with orthodontic and orthognathic surgical treatment. Seminars in Orthodontics, 6(4), 259-269.
Salehan, M., & Negahban, A. (2013). Social networking on smartphones: When mobile phones become addictive. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2632-2639.
Sarcu, D., & Adamson, P. (2017). Psychology of the facelift patient. Facial Plastic Surgery, 33(03), 252-259.
Schendel, S. A., & Carlotti, A. E., Jr. (1991). Nasal considerations in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100(3), 197-208.
Seah, T. E., Bellis, H., & Ilankovan, V. (2012). Orthognathic patients with nasal deformities: case for simultaneous orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 50(1), 55-59.
Sun, A. H., & Steinbacher, D. M. (2018). Orthognathic Surgery and Rhinoplasty: Simultaneous or Staged? Plast Reconstr Surg, 141(2), 322-329.
Van Der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204-215.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Caio Seiti Miyoshi; Orlando Motohiro Tanaka; Gil Guilherme Gasparello; Sergio Luiz Mota-Júnior; Giovani Ceron Hartmann; Elisa Souza Camargo; Lara Karolina Guimarães; Leticia Machado Berretta; Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
