Longevity of rehabilitatory treatment with direct and indirect veneers in anterior teeth: a Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i15.37369Keywords:
Dental Veneers; Esthetics; Composite Resins; Longevity.Abstract
With the development of aesthetic dentistry in search of minimally invasive procedures, the demands for a harmonious rehabilitative treatment have been increasingly detailed in pursuit of success. The aim of this article is to present a current narrative review on the comparison between the longevity of rehabilitative treatment with direct and indirect veneers in anterior teeth. The present study was carried out through a search for scientific articles in the Pubmed database, having as eligibility criteria the clinical assessment of the longevity of direct and indirect veneers in anterior teeth. As exclusion criteria, studies that evaluated restorations in posterior teeth, laboratory studies and literature reviews were excluded. The use of direct and indirect restorations provides a treatment with greater clinical longevity, fracture resistance, color stability, in addition to favoring the aesthetics and biocompatibility of the same. However, direct composite resin veneers showed greater instability in color, however, they presented advantages such as the ease of handling shape and color, allowing a better ease at the time of rehabilitation. Porcelain indirect veneers offer the patient greater strength and greater color stability, in addition to being manufactured extra-orally, it does not interfere with the advantages it offers in the treatment. It is concluded that indirect veneers on anterior teeth showed a relatively longer survival when compared to direct restorations.
References
De Angelis, F., D’Arcangelo, C., Angelozzi, R., & Vadini, M. (2021). Retrospective clinical evaluation of a no-prep porcelain veneer protocol. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, S0022-3913(21)00226-2.
Calamia, J. R. (1996). The current status of etched porcelain veneer restorations. The Journal of the Philippine Dental Association, 47(4), 35-41.
Chen, J. H., Shi, C. X., Wang, M., Zhao, S. J., & Wang, H. (2005). Clinical evaluation of 546 tetracycline-stained teeth treated with porcelain laminate veneers. Journal of dentistry, 33(1), 3-8.
Collares, K., Opdam, N. J. M., Laske, M., Bronkhorst, E. M., Demarco, F. F., Correa, M. B., & Huysmans, M. C. D. N. J. M. (2017). Longevity of anterior composite restorations in a general dental practice-based network. Journal of Dental Research, 96(10), 1092-1099.
Congiusta, M. A. (2017). No differences in longevity of direct and indirect composite restorations. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 18(2), 46-46.
Dallazen, E., Bueno, A. L. N., Araujo, F. D. O., Milani, P. A. P., & Pupo, Y. M. (2015). Alternativas de tratamento para reabilitação bucal estética e funcional. Revista Dental Press de Estética, 12(2).
D’arcangelo, C., De Angelis, F., Vadini, M., & D’Amario, M. (2012). Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years. Clinical oral investigations, 16(4), 1071-1079.
Galiatsatos, A., Galiatsatos, P., & Bergou, D. (2022). Clinical Longevity of Indirect Composite Resin Inlays and Onlays: An Up to 9-Year Prospective Study. European Journal of Dentistry, 16(01), 202-208.
Gomes, G., & Perdigão, J. (2014). Prefabricated composite resin veneers–A clinical review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 26(5), 302-313.
Gresnigt, M. M. M., Cune, M. S., Jansen, K., Van der Made, S. A. M., & Özcan, M. (2019). Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers: Up to 10-year findings. Journal of dentistry, 86, 102-109.
Guess, P. C., & Stappert, C. F. (2008). Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dental materials, 24(6), 804-813.
Gurel, G., Morimoto, S., Calamita, M. A., Coachman, C., & Sesma, N. (2012). Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers: outcomes of the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 32(6).
ahn, B., Wohlrab, T., Frese, C., Wolff, D., Krastl, G., Büsch, C., & Soliman, S. (2020). A Multicenter Trial on the Long-term Performance of Direct Composite Buildups in the Anterior Dentition. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 22(5).
Highton, R., & Caputo, A. A. (1987). A photoelastic study of stresses on porcelain laminate preparations. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 58(2), 157-161.
Høffding, J. (1995). Mastique laminate veneers: Results after 4 and 10 years of service. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 53(5), 283-286.
Hui, K. K., Williams, B., Davis, E. H., & Holt, R. D. (1991). A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics. British dental journal, 171(2), 51-55.
Kreulen, C. M., Creugers, N. H. J., & Meijering, A. C. (1998). Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. Journal of dentistry, 26(4), 345-353.
Meijering, A. C., Creugers, N. H. J., Roeters, F. J. M., & Mulder, J. (1998). Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. Journal of dentistry, 26(7), 563-568.
Milosevic, A. (2018). Clinical guidance and an evidence-based approach for restoration of the worn dentition by direct composite resin. British dental journal, 224(5), 301-310.
Morimoto, S., Albanesi, R. B., Sesma, N., Agra, C. M., & Braga, M. M. (2016). Main Clinical Outcomes of Feldspathic Porcelain and Glass-Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Complication Rates. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 29(1).
Nattress, B. R., Youngson, C. C., Patterson, C. J. W., Martin, D. M., & Ralph, J. P. (1995). An in vitro assessment of tooth preparation for porcelain veneer restorations. Journal of dentistry, 23(3), 165-170.
Nejatidanesh, F., Savabi, G., Amjadi, M., Abbasi, M., & Savabi, O. (2018). Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic laminate veneers—a retrospective study. Journal of prosthodontic research, 62(4), 462-467.
Olley, R. C., Andiappan, M., & Frost, P. M. (2018). An up to 50-year follow-up of crown and veneer survival in a dental practice. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 119(6), 935-941.
Peumans, M., De Munck, J., Fieuws, S., Lambrechts, P., Vanherle, G., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2004). A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. The journal of adhesive dentistry, 6(1), 65-76.
Peumans, M., Meerbeek, B. V., Lambrechts, P., & Vanherle, G. (1997). The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. Clinical oral investigations, 1(1), 12-18.
Peumans, M., Van Meerbeek, B., Lambrechts, P., Vanherle, G., & Quirynen, M. (1998). The influence of direct composite additions for the correction of tooth form and/or position on periodontal health. A retrospective study. Journal of periodontology, 69(4), 422-427.
Granell-Ruíz, M., Agustín-Panadero, R., Fons-Font, A., Román-Rodríguez, J. L., & Solá-Ruíz, M. F. (2014). Influence of bruxism on survival of porcelain laminate veneers. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 19(5), e426.
Rocha, E. P., Anchieta, R. B da Cunha Melo, R. A. Dos Santos, P. H., Assunção, W. G. de Souza, F. I., & Martini, A. P. (2021). Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive ceramic restorations executed by dentists with different levels of experience. Blind and prospective clinical study. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 65(2), 191-197.
Heintze, S. D., Rousson, V., & Hickel, R. (2015). Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations—A meta-analysis. Dental materials, 31(5), 481-495.
Silva, B. C. M. Ribeiro, H. H. S., Viana, H. C, Mendonça, M. B. Silva, G. R., & Dietrich, L. A. (2017). Importância da reabilitação oral através da prótese parcial removível: relato de caso. Revista Organizações em Contexto, São Bernardo do Campo, 1(2), 71-81.
Stappert, C. F., Ozden, U., Gerds, T., & Strub, J. R. (2005). Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 94(2), 132-139.
Staehle, H. J., Wohlrab, T., Saure, D., Wolff, D., & Frese, C. (2015). A 6.5-year clinical follow-up of direct resin composite buildups in the posterior dentition: Introduction of a new minimally invasive restorative method. Journal of dentistry, 43(10), 1211-1217.
Staehle, H. J., Wolff, D., & Frese, C. (2015). More conservative dentistry: clinical long-term results of direct composite resin restorations. Quintessence International, 46(5).
Stappert, C. F., Ozden, U., Gerds, T., & Strub, J. R. (2005). Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 94(2), 132-139.
Swift Jr, E. J., Friedman, M. J., & Swift Jr, E. J. (2006). Porcelain veneer outcomes, part I. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 18(1), 54-57.
Aslan, Y. U., Uludamar, A., & Özkan, Y. (2019). Retrospective analysis of lithium disilicate slaminate veneers applied by experienced dentists: 10-year results. Int. J. Prosthodont, 32, 471-474.
Zarone, F., Leone, R., Di Mauro, M. I., Ferrari, M., & Sorrentino, R. (2018). No-preparation ceramic veneers: a systematic review. Journal of Osseointegration, 10(1), 17-22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Bhrenda Cerqueira Teixeira; Mariana Messias Vilas Novas; Lorena dos Santos Rodrigues; Nathalia Silveira Finck
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
