Melon fruit yield and quality as a function of doses and times of biostimulant application

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3911

Keywords:

Cucumis melo L.; Growth; Yield; Growth regulator.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the productivity and quality of melon fruits as a function of the dose and time of application of biostimulant in the conditions of the semi-arid region of Paraíba. The experiment was carried out at the Federal University of Campina Grande, campus of Pombal - PB, Brazil, in a randomized block design in a 4 x 5 split plot scheme, with doses of biostimulant (0; 0.5; 1.0; 1, 5 and 2.0 L ha-1) and in the subset of the biostimulant application times (15; 20; 25 and 30 days before harvest - DAC), in four replications. Characteristics related to fruit production and quality were evaluated. There was no interaction between the factors of dose and application time of the biostimulant in any of the evaluated characteristics. Thus, the highest estimated values of number of fruits per plant, fruit mass and total melon production were obtained with the application of doses ranging from 0.9 to 1.5 L ha-1 and at the time of application it varied from 22,5 to 23.6 DAC. The content of soluble solids increased 5.5% when the biostimulant dose of 2.0 L ha-1 was used and 4.4% when the product was applied 15 days before harvest.

References

Beling R. R. (ed.). (2018). Brazilian horti & fruti yearbook. Santa Cruz do Sul: Editora Gazeta Santa Cruz, 96 p.

Aroucha, E.M.M.; Sousa, C.M.G.; Medeiros, J.F.; Goes, G.B.; Nascimento, I.B. & Araújo, N.O. (2018). Pre-Harvest Application of Plant Biostimulant on the Quality and Shelf-Life of Yellow Melon (Cucumis melo L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 10(2) 252–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v10n2p252.

Cavalcanti, F.J.A. (2008). Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco (org.). Recomendações de adubação para o estado de Pernambuco: 2 aproximação. 2. ed. Recife, Pernambuco: IPA, 94 p.

Cohen, S.; Itkin, M.; Yeselson, Y.; Tzuri, G.; Portnoy, V.; Harel-Baja, R.; Lev, S.; Sa‘Ar, U.; Davidovitz-Rikanati, R. & Baranes, N. (2014). The PH genes determines fruit acidity and contributes to the evolution of sweet melons. Natute Communications, 5(1) 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5026.

Costa, J.D.S.; Almeida, F.A.C.; Figueiredo Neto, A. & Cavalcante, I.H.L. (2017). Physical and mechanical parameters correlated to the ripening of mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Tommy Atkins, Agronomic minutes, 66(2) 186–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/acag.v66n2.54757.

Dourado Neto, D.; Dario, G.J.A; Barbieri, A.P.P. & Martin, T.N. (2014). Biostimulant action on corn and bean agronomic performance. Bioscience Journal, 30(3) 371–379.

Embrapa – Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos (Rio de janeiro, RJ). (2008). Brazilian system of soil classification – Brasília: EMBRAPA, 412.

Galindo, F.S.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M.; Buzetti, S.; Alves, C.J.; Garcia, C.M.P. & Nogueira, L.M. (2019). Seaweed extract as a biostimulant in the nutrition and productivity of irrigated wheat in the Cerrado region. Colloquium Agrariae, 15(1): 130–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.5747/ca.2019.v15.n1.a277.

Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Analytical standards, chemical and physical methods of food. (1985). 3. ed. São Paulo: IAL: 1, 553p.

IBGE. (2019). Agricultural production. available in: http://www. sidra.ibge.gov.br, (Accessed: July 23, 2019)

Halpern, M.; Bar-Tal, A.; Ofek, M.; Minz, D.; Muller, T. & Yermiyahu, U. (2015). The Use of Biostimulants for Enhancing Nutrient Uptake. Advances In Agronomy, 130(1); p.141–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.001

Izidório, T.H.C.; Lima, S.F.; Vendrusculo, E.P.; Ávila, J. & Alvarez, R.C.F. (2015). Leaf biostimulant in lettuce after seedling transplantation. Neotropical Agriculture Magazine, 2(2): 49–56

Kauffman, G.L.; Kneivel, D.P. & Watschke, T.L. (2007). Effects of a biostimulant on the heat tolerance associated with photosynthetic capacity, membrane thermostability, and polyphenol production of perennial ryegrass. Crop Science, 47(1): 261–267 http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0171

Leão, P.C.S.; Silva, D.J. & Silva, E.E.G. (2005). Effect of gibberellic acid, crop set biostimulant and annealing on the production and quality of the Thompson Seedless grape in the São Francisco Valley. Brazilian Journal of fruit growing, 27(3): 418–421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-29452005000300019

Matos, J.P.; Correia, E.C.S.S.; Monteiro, R.N.F.; Domingues Neto, F.J. & Silva, D.P. (2017). Flowering and fruit yield of 'Daiane' zucchini under application of vegetable regulator and leaf fertilizer. Brazilian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 11(1): 107–115 http://dx.doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2017v11n1p107-115

Martins, J.C.P.; Aroucha, E.M.M.; Medeiros, J.F.; Nascimento, I.B. & Paula, V.F.S. (2013). Postharvest characteristics of fruits of watermelon cultivars submitted to biostimulant application. Caatinga Magazine, Mossoró, 26(2): 18–24.

Moreira, R.A.; Cruz, M.C.M.; Fagundes, M.C.P.; Pantoja, L.A. & Santos, A.S. (2014). Leaf carbohydrates during flowering and early stages of fruit growth in 'Ponkan' tangerine. Brazilian Agricultural Research, 49(1): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014000100005

Nasir, M.; Khan, A.S.; Basra, S.M.A. & Malik, A.U. (2016). Foliar application of moringa leaf extract, potassium and zinc influence yield and fruit quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin. Scientia Horticulturae, 210(1): 227–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.032.

Pereira, A.M.; Silva, G.D.; Almeida, R.R.P.; Silva, A.B. & Queiroga, R.C.F. (2012). Fruiting of Tetsukabuto squash on application of 2,4-D doses in the dry season in Pombal-PB. Green Journal of Agroecology and Sustainable Development, 7(4): 38–43.

Queiroga, R.C.F.; Puiatti, M.; Fontes, P.C.R. & Cecon P.R. (2009). Melon fruit characteristics varying number and position of fruits in the plant. Brazilian Horticulture, 27(1): 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362009000100005

Souza, R.T.; Nachtiga, J.C.; Morante, J.P. & Santana, A.P.S. (2010). Effects of doses and application of growth regulators on seedless grapes, cv. BRS CLARA, in a tropical region. Brazilian Journal of Fruit, Jaboticabal-SP, 32(3): 763–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-29452010005000109.

Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E., Moller, I.M. & Murphy, A. (2017). Physiology and plant development, 6 edition, Artmed, Porto Alegre, BR, 888p.

Tavares, S.; Camargo, P.R.; Ambrosano, E.J.; Cato, S.C. & Foltran, D.E. (2015). Biostimulant effects on the development of 'Carmen' tomato fruits. Agroecology Notebooks, 9(4): 1–10. http://revistas.aba-agroecologia.org.br/index.php/cad/article/view/16832

Vendruscolo, E.P.; Rabelo, R.S.; Campos, L.F.C.; Martins, A.P.B.; Semensato, L.R. & Seleguini, A. (2017). Physical-chemical changes in muskmelon fruits under biostimulant applications. Colombian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 11(2): 459–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2017v11i2.7413

Downloads

Published

03/05/2020

How to Cite

QUEIROGA, R. C. F. de; SILVA, Z. L. da; OLIVEIRA DE, O. H.; SANTOS, E. da N.; SILVA, H. L. O.; DA COSTA, F. B.; DE ASSIS, L. E. Melon fruit yield and quality as a function of doses and times of biostimulant application. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. e130973911, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3911. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3911. Acesso em: 24 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences