Factors that interfere in the delivery and birth process: an integrative literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4470Keywords:
Parturition; Pregnant women; Nursing; Review.Abstract
For considering childbirth and birth as a unique process with specificities that interfere in the lives of the people involved, especially for the mother, child and family; We sought to identify scientific evidence in the national and international literature the factors that interfere in the process of childbirth and birth. This is an integrative literature review carried out in the databases of Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS) and Publisher Medline (PubMed), with the descriptors "childbirth" and "pregnant women". 734 studies were found, of which 41 were included in the study. In prenatal care, health education actions are an essential element for preparing for childbirth. It was highlighted that the use of innovative methodologies must be combined with personal contact, bonding and the valuation of singularities and integrality. Still, it became evident that the birth process is considered a ritual of passage and that this experience gives new meaning and gives meaning to the life of the woman and her family. Therefore, the support received by midwives was identified as a differential. However, obstetric care is shown to be fragmented, the binomial mother and child do not have their well-being prioritized. Parturients still wander through the maternity hospitals in search of care, where they are attended with inadequate interventions and abuse of professional and institutional power. It is necessary to change the paradigm, through professional qualification, of training that sensitize humanized, integral and safe care, supported by scientificity and by rescuing the valorization of childbirth and birth as a physiological and social event.
References
Andrade UV., Santos JB., Duarte C. (2019). A percepção da gestante sobre a qualidade do atendimento pré-natal em UBS, Campo Grande, MS. Rev Psicol Saúde, 11(1):53-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20435/pssa.v0i0.585
Berhe AK., Kassa GM., Fekadu GA., Muche AA. (2018). Prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,18(1):34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1667-7
Boerma T., Ronsmans C., Melesse DY., Barros AJD., Barros FC., Juan L et al. (2018). Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet, 392(10155):1341-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
Brasil. (2017). Diretrizes nacionais de assistência ao parto normal: versão resumida [recurso eletrônico]. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 51 p.: il.
Brito CA., Silva ASS., Cruz RSBLC., Pinto SL. (2015). Percepções de puérperas sobre a preparação para o parto no pré-natal. Rev Rene, 16(4):470-8. DOI: 10.15253/2175-6783.2015000400003
Cavalcante MCV., Lamy Filho F., França AKTC., Lamy ZC. (2017). Relação mãe-filho e fatores associados: análise hierarquizadade base populacional em uma capital do Brasil-Estudo BRISA. Cien Saude Colet, 22(5):1683-93. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232017225.21722015
Diniz CSG., Salgado HO., Andrezzo HFA., Carvalho PGG., Carvalho PCA., Aguiar CA et al. (2015). Abuse and disrespect in childbirth care as a public health issue in Brazil: origins, definitions, impacts on maternal health, and proposals for its prevention. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 25(3):377-84. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.106080
Duarte AFS., Martins ALC., Miguel MD., Miguel OG. (2017). O uso de plantas medicinais durante a gravidez e amamentação. Visão Acadêmica(Curitiba), 18(4):126-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/acd.v18i4.55983
Ezeome IV., Ezugworie JO., Udealor PC. (2018). Beliefs, perceptions, and views of pregnant women about cesarean section and reproductive decision-making in a specialist health facility in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract, 21(4):423-8. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_413_16
Ferreira LS., Santos AF., Bezerra IP., Alves DA., Damasceno SS., Figueiredo ME et al. (2017). Assistência de enfermagem durante o trabalho de parto e parto: a percepção da mulher. Rev Cubana Enferm [citado em 10 mai 2020];33(2). Disponível em: http://www.revenfermeria.sld.cu/index.php/enf/article/view/1102
Gomes RPC., Silva RS., Oliveira DCC., Manzo BF., Guimarães GL., Souza KV. (2017). Plano de parto em rodas de conversa: escolhas das mulheres. REME – Rev Min Enferm, 21:e-1033. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20170043
Gonçalves MF., Teixeira bem., Silva MAS., Corsi NM., Ferrari RAP., PellosoSM et al. (2017). Pré-natal: preparo para o parto na atenção primária à saúde no sul do Brasil. Rev Gaúcha Enferm, 38(3):e2016-0063. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.03.2016-0063
Kottwitz F., Gouveia HG., Gonçalves AC. (2018). Via de parto preferida por puérperas e suas motivações. Esc. Anna Nery, 22(1):e20170013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0013
Lima SS., Silva LCS., Santos MV., Martins JP., Oliveira MC., Brasileiro ME. (2017). HIV na gestação: pré-natal, parto e puerpério. Ciência & Saúde, 10(1):56-61.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2017.1.22695
Nakano AR., Bonan C., Teixeira LA. (2017). O trabalho de parto do obstetra: estilo de pensamento e normalização do“parto cesáreo” entre obstetras. Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva, 27(3):415-32. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312017000300003
Oliveira RR., Melo EC., Novaes ES., Ferracioli PLRV., Mathias TAF. (2016). Factors associated to caesarean delivery in public and private health care systems. Rev Esc Enferm USP, 50(5):733-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420160000600004
Pereira MS. (2016). Associação das Parteiras Tradicionais do Maranhão: relato da assistência ao parto. Saúde Soc, 25(3):589-601. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-129020162542
Pereira RM., Fonseca GO., Pereira ACCC., Gonçalves GA., Mafra RA. (2018). Novas práticas de atenção ao parto e os desafios paraa humanização da assistência nas regiões sul e sudeste do Brasil. Cien Saude Colet, 23(11):3517-24. DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320182311.07832016
Sena LM., & Tesser CD. (2017). Violência obstétrica no Brasile o ciberativismo de mulheres mães: relato de duas experiências. Interface comun saúde educ, 21(60):209-20. DOI: 10.1590/1807-57622015.0896
Silva AL., Nascimento ER., Coelho, Ed., Nunes, IM. Atividades educativas no pré-natal sob o olhar de mulheres grávidas. (2015). Rev Cubana Enferm [citado em 10 mai 2020];30(1). Disponível em: http://revenfermeria.sld.cu/index.php/enf/article/view/487
Souza SRRK., & Gualda DMR. (2016). A experiência da mulher e de seu acompanhante no parto em uma maternidade pública. Texto Contexto Enferm,25(1):e4080014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-0707201600004080014
Souza AB., Silva LC., Alves RN., Alarcão ACJ. (2016). Fatores associados à ocorrência de violência obstétrica institucional: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev Ciênc Méd (Campinas). 25(3):115-28. http://periodicos.puccampinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/cienciasmedicas/article/view/3641/2486
Sousa JL., Silva IP., Gonçalves LRR., Nery IS., Gomes IS., Sousa LFC. (2018). Percepção de puérperas sobre a posição vertical no parto. Rev baiana enferm, 32:e27499. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18471/rbe.v32.27499
Tostes NA., & Seidl EMF. (2016). Expectativas de gestantes sobre o parto e suas percepções acerca da preparação para o parto. Temas em Psicologia, 24(2):681-93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9788/TP2016.2-15
Vain NE. Em tempo: como e quando deve ser feito o clampeamento do cordão umbilical: será que realmente importa? (2015). Rev Paul Pediatr, 33(3):258-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2015.06.001
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva.
Whittemore R., & Knafl K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs, 52(5):546-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
