Impact of utilitarian value and hedonic value on purchase in online store in Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8305

Keywords:

Online Shopping; Digital marketing; Utilitarian value; Hedonic value.

Abstract

Nowadays, Indonesia shopping patterns have significantly changed. E-commerce continues to grow rapidly as online shopping has become increasingly attractive. Online shopping saves time and offers convenience. This study was conducted in order to assess the impact of utilitarian and hedonic values on purchasing from online stores in Indonesia. The focus of the assessment was on five dimensions of hedonism and utilitarianism, which are: usefulness, enjoyment, ease of use, trustworthiness, and distribution channel (settlement). A total of 484 respondents were randomly asked to be participants. A questionnaire was the research instrument used to survey the participants for data gathering. The data was then analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Among the indicators tested, it was found that usefulness, enjoyment, ease of use, and distribution channel impacted hedonic values and utilitarian values significantly. Trustworthiness was the dimension that was not significant. For this study, the hypothesis was made that usefulness and enjoyment positively impacted impulsiveness. It can be concluded that whether due to utilitarian, hedonic, or impulsive motives, it will not be a problem. Indonesian shoppers will make purchases thru online shopping even if they have different motivations and purposes.

References

Abratt, R., & Goodey, S. D. (1990). Unplanned buying and in‐store stimuli in supermarkets. Managerial and Decision Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090110204

Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A., & Wood, S. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251788

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656.

Chen, M. Y., & Teng, C. I. (2013). A comprehensive model of the effects of online store image on purchase intention in an e-commerce environment. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9104-5

Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A Conceptual Model of Perceived Customer Value in E-Commerce: A Preliminary Investigation. Psychology and Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10076

Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2

Crowley, A. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Hughes, K. R. (1992). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories. Marketing Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994132

Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.104

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Davis, L., Wang, S., & Lindridge, A. (2008). Culture influences on emotional responses to on-line store atmospheric cues. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.08.005

Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718

Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926629

Forsythe, S., Liu, C., Shannon, D., & Gardner, L. C. (2006). Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20061

Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251707

Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.42.1.43.56889

Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59(10–11), 1160–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.008

Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170

Van der Heijden, H., & Verhagen, T. (2004). Online store image: Conceptual foundations and empirical measurement. Information and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.07.001

Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238

Westbrook, R. A., & Black, W. C. (1985). A motivation-based shopper typology. Journal of Retailing.

Downloads

Published

20/09/2020

How to Cite

BUDIHARSENO, R. S. .; HANDANI, N. D. .; HWAN, S. J. . Impact of utilitarian value and hedonic value on purchase in online store in Indonesia. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 10, p. e1159108305, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8305. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8305. Acesso em: 8 aug. 2022.

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences