Associated factors to suicidal behavior among graduate students – scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9095Keywords:
Graduate education; Suicide; Precipitating factors; Protective factors; Review.Abstract
Objective: to describe the methodological steps, through the construction of a scope review protocol aiming at the identification of factors associated with suicidal behavior among graduate students. Method of review: Scope review protocol developed considering mainly the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute. An iterative search strategy is proposed in multiple repositories: SCOPUS, LILACS, Medline (Pubmed), Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Thesis, and CAPES Thesis and Dissertation Bank. The data selection and extraction process will take place through the evaluation of two reviewers acting independently. Presentation and interpretation of results: Results will be presented in tabular and narrative form. Conclusion: This protocol aims to describe the methodological steps for conducting a scoping review, aiming to reduce bias in the search and selection of references, making these criteria clear and uniform among reviewers.
References
Arksey, H. & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (1), 19-32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Cescon, L. F., Capozzolo, A. A. & Lima, L. C. (2018). Approaches and detachments towards suicide: analyzers of a psychosocial care service. Saúde e Sociedade, 27 (1), 185-200. doi: 10.1590/s0104-12902018170376.
Eleftheriades, R., Fiala, C., & Pasic, M. D. (2020). The challenges and mental health issues of academic trainees. F1000Research, 9 (104). doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21066.1.
Espinet, S., Corrin, T., Baliunas, D. Quilty, L, Zawertailo, L., Rizvi, S. J. & Selby, P. (2019). Predisposing and protective factors influencing suicide ideation, attempt, and death in patients accessing substance use treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Systematic Reviews, 8 (115). doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1028-2.
Garcia-Williams, A., Moffitt, L. E. & Kaslow, N. (2014). Mental Health and Suicidal Behavior Among Graduate Students, Academic Psychiatry, 38 (5), 554-60. doi: 10.1007/s40596-014-0041-y
Hoying, J., Melnyk, B. M., Hutson, E. & Tan, A. (2020). Prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, stress, healthy beliefs, and lifestyle behaviors in first‐year graduate health sciences students. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 17 (1), 49-59. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12415.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology, Implementation Science, 5 (1), 1-9. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
Li, W., Dorstyn, D. S., & Jarmon, E. (2019). Identifying suicide risk among college students: A systematic review. Death Studies. 5, 1-9. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1578305.
Lockwood, C., dos Santos, K. B. & Pap, R. (2019). Practical guidance for knowledge synthesis: scoping review methods. Asian Nursing Research. 21(54), 287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002.
Meurer, A. M., Lopes, I. F., Antonelli, R. A. & Colauto, R. D. (2020). Experiences in graduate studies, behavior in social networks and well-being. Educação e Realidade, 45 (1), e86158. doi: 10.1590/2175-623686158
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M. …Prisma-P Group (2015). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1). doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
Munn, Z., Peters, M., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., Mclnerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., Khalil, H. (2020). Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris, E., Munn, Z. (editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Recuperado de https://wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews
Santos, A. S., Perrone, C. M. & Dias, A. C. G. (2015). Adjustment to graduation: a systematic review of literature. Psico-USF, 20 (1), 141-152. doi: 10.1590/1413-82712015200113.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O´Brien, K. K. Colquhoun, H., Levac, D. … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annal of Internal Medicine, 169 (7), 467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Moises Kogien; Samira Reschetti Marcon; Angellica Fernandes de Oliveira; Vanessa Ferraz Leite; Camille Francine Modena; Frantielen Castor dos Santos Nascimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
