Analyze of individual performance indicators applied to industrial maintenance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i6.3660Keywords:
quality tools; performance indicator; maintenance managementAbstract
The need for new technologies and efficient management of resources requires the use of performance indicators whose information ensures management in a visual and fast way. Today, maintenance is a sector that is technological and developed, and indicators that can develop the team a lot. The proposed study aims to analyze the individual performance indicators of the maintenance team, in addition to identifying the main problems affecting efficiency in the sector. To this end, a case study was carried out in the maintenance sector of a food industry. With the subsequent application of Pareto, it was possible to observe which the most impacting points were. After the application of Ishikawa, it is possible to identify the causes, and with the 5W2H points of improvement in the process were defined, planning with the actions for monitoring and execution, this action plan was proposed because of all analysis of the indicators. It is concluded that the indicators are necessary for a good management, and the application of the tools facilitates the vision of the indicators and still allows the improvement of them.
References
Ahmadi, R., & Fouladirad, M. (2017). Maintenance planning for a deteriorating production process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 159, 108-118.
Ahuja, I. P. S., & Khamba, J. S. (2008). Total productive maintenance: literature review and directions. International journal of quality & reliability management.
Da Silva, A. B., Godoi, C. K., & Bandeira-de-Mello, R. (2000). Pesquisa Qualitativa Em Estudos Organizacionais: Paradigmas, Estratégias E Métodos . Editora Saraiva.1
Faesarella, I. S., Sacomano, J. B., & Carpinetti, L. C. (2006). Gestão da qualidade: conceitos e ferramentas.
Faria, A. C. D., & Costa, M. D. F. G. D. (2005). Gestão de custos logísticos. São Paulo: Atlas, 147-161.
Garg, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2006). Maintenance management: literature review and directions. Journal of quality in maintenance engineering.
Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M. (2016). SWOT analysis for Planned Maintenance strategy-a case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 674-679.
Kardec, A., & Nascif, J. (2009). Manutenção-função estratégica. Qualitymark Editora Ltda.
Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A. (2017). Metodologia científica. São Paulo: Atlas.
Lóta, V. R. D., & Marins, F. A. S. (2003). Determinação de indicadores de desempenho da Logística e do PCP. Anais do XXIII Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção-Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil.
Miguel, P. A. C., & Ho, L. L. (2010). Levantamento tipo survey. Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações.
Muchiri, P., Pintelon, L., Gelders, L., & Martin, H. (2011). Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 295-302.
Murça, V. (2012). Aplicação da filosofia Lean na área da Manutenção. 101f (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertação (Mestrado)-Curso de Engenharia Mecânica, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Lisboa).
Nagao, S. K., & Muscat, A. (1998). Manutenção industrial: análise, diagnóstico e propostas de melhoria de performance em indústrias de processo.
Netto, W. A. C. (2008). A importância e a aplicabilidade da manutenção produtiva total (TPM) nas indústrias. UFJF, Juiz de Fora, MG.
Oliveira, J. C. S. (2013). Análise de indicadores de qualidade e produtividade da manutenção nas indústrias brasileiras. Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas, 9(3), 53.
Otani, M., & Machado, W. V. (2008). A proposta de desenvolvimento de gestão da manutenção industrial na busca da excelência ou classe mundial. Revista Gestão Industrial, Ponta Grossa, 4(2), 1-16.
Parida, A., & Kumar, U. (2009). Maintenance productivity and performance measurement. In Handbook of maintenance management and engineering (pp. 17-41). Springer, London.
Pereira, A.S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Recuperado em 10, abril, 2020 de https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Simões, J. M., Gomes, C. F., & Yasin, M. M. (2011). A literature review of maintenance performance measurement. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering.
Slack, N., Chambers, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Administração da produção (Vol. 747). São Paulo: Atlas.
Tavares, L. A., Calixto, M., & Poydo, P. R. (2005). Manutenção centrada no negócio. 1ª edição. Rio de Janeiro: NAT.
Viana, H. R. G. (2002). PCM-Planejamento e Controle da manutenção. Qualitymark Editora Ltda.
Xavier, J. N. (2001). Indicadores de manutenção. Minas Gerais, (13), 01-14.
Xenos, H. G. (1998). Gerenciando a manutenção produtiva. Belo Horizonte: Editora de desenvolvimento gerencial, 171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
