Analysis of fermentative parameters and the importance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the development of goods and services

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10586

Keywords:

Metabolites; Fermentation process; Biotechnology.

Abstract

In the fermentation process, yeasts need to adapt to the environmental changes that occur during the production process. Responses to these adjustments can alter biochemical routes and the amount of metabolites produced. Thus, the objective was to analyze the fermentative parameters of industrial yeast strains in different growing conditions, as well as to evaluate the its applicability in different sectors of goods and services. A pre-inoculum was performed with the YPSAC 5% medium for the activation of the yeasts Catanduva-1 and Fleischmann that remained incubated for 24 hours at 30 °C at 250 rpm. After the cells were recovered by centrifugation and inoculated in the fermentation medium based on sugarcane juice at 15 °Brix at temperatures of 30 and 40 °C. Aliquots were removed for the analysis of the fermentative parameters. Concomitantly, a survey was carried out regarding the use of yeasts in the process of preparing goods and services. The data show that the best yeast fermentation performance occurred at 30 °C in 10 hours. In addition, yeasts have the ability to produce, under ideal conditions, metabolites that can be used in different biotechnological processes.

Author Biographies

Margareth Batistote, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Naturais PGRN/UEMS

Maria do Socorro Mascarenhas Santos, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul

Programa de Pós-Graduação Graduação em Recursos Naturais / PGRN Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul / UEMS

References

Badotti, F., Dário, M. G., Alves, S. L., Cordioli, M. L. A., Miletti, L. C., de Araujo, P. S., & Stambuk, B. U. (2008). Switching the mode of sucrose utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbial Cell Factories, 7(1), 1-11.

Bandara, A., Fraser, S., Chambers, P. J., & Stanley, G. A. (2009). Trehalose promotes the survival of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during lethal ethanol stress, but does not influence growth under sublethal ethanol stress. FEMS yeast research, 9(8), 1208-1216.

Barbosa, H. S. (2013). Fermentação de mosto com alto teor de sacarose para a produção de bioetanol combustível por diferentes linhagens de Saccharomyces cerevisiae usando alta densidade celular.

Basso, L. C., Basso, T. O., & Rocha, S. N. (2011). Ethanol production in Brazil: the industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. Biofuel production-recent developments and prospects, 1530, 85-100.

Basso, L. C., De Amorim, H. V., De Oliveira, A. J., & Lopes, M. L. (2008). Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Research, 8(7), 1155-1163.

Batistote, M., Cardoso, C. A. L., Ramos, D. D., & Ernandes, J. R. (2010). Desempenho de leveduras obtidas em indústria de Mato Grosso do Sul na produção de etanol em mosto a base de cana de açúcar. Ciência & Natura, 83-95.

Fairbairn, S. (2012). Stress, fermentation performance and aroma production by yeast (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).

François, JM, Walther, T., & Parrou, JL (2012). Genética e regulação do metabolismo do glicogênio e da trealose em Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Em Microbial stress tolerance for biofuels (pp. 29-55). Springer, Berlim, Heidelberg.

Kawai, K., Kanesaki, Y., Yoshikawa, H., & Hirasawa, T. (2019). Identification of metabolic engineering targets for improving glycerol assimilation ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on adaptive laboratory evolution and transcriptome analysis. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 128(2), 162-169.

Knudsen, J. D., Johanson, T., Lantz, A. E., & Carlquist, M. (2015). Exploring the potential of the glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 2 (GPD2) promoter for recombinant gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Reports, 7, 107-119.

Lee, S. S., Robinson, F. M., & Wang, H. Y. (1981). Rapid determination of yeast viability. In Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp.;(United States) (V. 11, No. CONF-810554-). Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical chemistry, 31(3), 426-428.

Naghshbandi, M. P., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Gupta, V. K., Sulaiman, A., Karimi, K., & Maleki, M. (2019). Progress toward improving ethanol production through decreased glycerol generation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic and genetic engineering approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 115, 109353.

Nandy, S. K., & Srivastava, R. K. (2018). A review on sustainable yeast biotechnological processes and applications. Microbiological Research, 207, 83-90.

Pereira, F. B., Guimarães, P. M., Teixeira, J. A., & Domingues, L. (2011). Robust industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 112(2), 130-136.

Prodanov, C. C., & de Freitas, E. C. (2013). Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico (2a ed.), Editora Feevale.

Santos, J. R. A., de Gusmão, N. B., & Gouveia, E. R. (2010). Selection of industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with potential performance for ethanol production in adverse conditions of temperature and agitation. Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, 12(1), 75-80.

Stanley, D., Bandara, A., Fraser, S., Chambers, P. J., & Stanley, G. A. (2010). The ethanol stress response and ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 109(1), 13-24.

Zhao, X. Q., & Bai, F. W. (2009). Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. Journal of Metodologia

Downloads

Published

08/12/2020

How to Cite

BATISTOTE, M.; SANTOS, M. do S. M. . Analysis of fermentative parameters and the importance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the development of goods and services. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 11, p. e93691110586, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10586. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10586. Acesso em: 26 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences