Scientometric data in the context "sustainable development in Brazil" in the last 10 years

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15434

Keywords:

Bibliometry; Elsevier; Scopus; USP.

Abstract

The concern with sustainable development represents the possibility of guaranteeing socio-political changes that do not compromise the ecological and social systems that sustain life. In this context, a bibliographic and scientometric survey was carried out in terms of sustainable development, important tools to study and measure the progress of science in quantitative and qualitative analyzes. Productivity was ascertained through bibliometric assessments, using databases of access to science documents, “Elsevier Scopus” between the period: from 2009 to 2019, involving the keywords “Sustainable Development in Brazil”. The statistical analysis was expressed by the GraphPad Prism 6 program. In analyzing the data published in the “SCOPUS” database, it was possible to observe that the first work published with the concept “sustainable development in Brazil” was in 1982, and throughout the number of studies on this topic has been increasing steadily over the years, and today, 3,520 works are registered on this platform. Brazil stands out with the largest number of works in the last 10 years, totaling around 1976 works, where the ranking is led by “USP- Universidade de São Paulo”, a considerably important University in the country, with currently 324. Data like these they are promising to find out how is the productivity in a respective subject across the country.

References

Abramovay, R. (2010). Desenvolvimento sustentável: qual a estratégia para o Brasil?. Novos estudos CEBRAP, (87), 97-113.

Barata, M. M. L. (2007). O setor empresarial e a sustentabilidade no Brasil. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 1(1), 70-86.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 82(3), 495-506.

Bezerra, M. C. L., & Bursztyn, M. Ciência e Tecnologia para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis: Consórcio CDS/ UNB/ Abipti, 2000.

Calegare, M. G. A., & Silva Junior, N. (2011). Progress, Sustainable Development and Different Approaches to Development: a Brief Literature Review. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 24, 39-56.

Camargo, A. L. B. (2007). Desenvolvimento sustentável: dimensões e desafios. (3a ed.), Papirus.

Comissão Mundial Sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento (CMMAD). (1991). Nosso futuro comum. (2a ed.), Editora FGV.

Costa, A. B., Ribeiro, M. M., Serafim, M., Dias, R. B., Jesus, V. M. B., Dagnino, R. P., Bagattolli, C., & Abreu, K. D. R. (2019). Tecnologia Social e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Pólis, São Paulo, 2013 Brasília: Fundação Banco do Brasil 284 p. http://polis.org.br/publicacoes/ tecnologia-social-e-politicas-publicas/ Last access.

Diegues, A. C. S. (2001). Ecologia humana e planejamento em áreas costeiras. (2a ed.), NUPAUB/USP.

Feil, A. A., & Schreiber, D. (2017). Sustainability and sustainable development: unraveling overlays and scope of their meanings. Cad. EBAPE.BR, 14(3), 7-18.

Franco, M. P. V. (2019). A question of power: sustainable consumption and ecological sufficiency as alternative discourses for sustainability. Sociedade & Natureza, 31, 1-21.

Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804.

Kamdem, J. P., Roos, D. H., Sanmi, A. A., Calabró, L., Abolaji, A. O., de Oliveira, C. S., Barros, L. M., Duarte, A. E., Barbosa, N. V., Souza, D. O., Rocha, J. B. T. (2018). Productivity of CNPq Researchers from Different Fields in Biomedical Sciences: The Need for Objective Bibliometric Parameters—A Report from Brazil. Science and Engineering Ethics. 25(4), 1037-1055.

Maimon, D. A. Economia e a problemática ambiental. (1993). In: Vieira, P. F., Maiomon, D. (Orgs.). As ciências sociais e a questão ambiental: rumo à interdisciplinaridade. NAEA-UFPA.

Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento: Documentos Oficiais. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente – Coordenadoria de Educação Ambiental. São Paulo, 1993 Conferência Intergovernamental Sobre Educação Ambiental Tbilisi, Geórgia, ex-URSS, de 14 a 26 de outubro de 1977. http://igeologico.sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/cea/Tbilisicompleto.pdf.

Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. L. (2010). The extent of multidisciplinary authorship of articles on scientometrics and bibliometrics in Brazil. Interciencia, 35(7), 510-514.

Obata, S. H., Agostinho, F., Almeida, C. M., & Giannetti, B. F. (2019). LEED certification as booster for sustainable buildings: Insights for a Brazilian context. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 170-178.

Otterloo, A. (2009). Tecnologias Sociais: Caminhos para a Sustentabilidade, Rede de Tecnologia Social.

Ríos-Osório, L. A. (2013). The concept of sustainable development from an ecosystem perspective: history, evolution, and epistemology. In: Yáñez-Arancibia, A. et al. Ecological Dimensions for Sustainable Socio Economic Development. WIT Press.

Silva, J. A. D., & Bianchi, M. D. L. P. (2001). Cientometria: a métrica da ciência. Paidéia, 11(21), 5-10.

Silva, M. R., Hayashi, C. R. M., & Hayashi, M. C. P. I. (2011). Bibliometric and scientometric analyses: challenges for specialists working in the field. InCID: Revista de Ciência da Informação e Documentação, 2(1), 110-129.

UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication - a synthesis for policy makers. United Nations Environment Programme: France.

Unica, B. S. I. A. Uma Solução para o Etanol Brasileiro. www.unica.com.br/ download.php?idSecao=17&id=39764189 2014.

Zerriffi, H., & Wilson, E. (2010). Leapfrogging over development? Promoting rural renewables for climate change mitigation. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1689-700.

Zhao, D., & Li, Y. R. (2015). Climate change and sugarcane production: potential impact and mitigation strategies. International Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 1–10.

Published

16/05/2021

How to Cite

SAMPAIO, R. S. L. .; LIMA, E. E. .; BEZERRA, J. de S. .; PEREIRA, K. S. .; SANTOS, L. T. dos .; SOBRAL, S. D. C. .; SILVA, J. dos S. .; OLIVEIRA, M. G. de .; OLIVEIRA, R. S. de .; PEREIRA, G. G. .; PEREIRA, F. D. .; OLIVEIRA, M. A. S. de .; OLIVEIRA, B. A. de .; GONÇALO, M. A. B. F. .; COSTA, A. R. . Scientometric data in the context "sustainable development in Brazil" in the last 10 years. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 5, p. e56210515434, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15434. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15434. Acesso em: 2 feb. 2023.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences