Prosthetic solution for whistling in fixed prostheses on implants: a case report

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i9.32025

Keywords:

Dental Implants; Dental Esthetics; Dental restoration failure.

Abstract

This clinical case report aims to describe the prosthetic solutions in a case of phonetic alteration reported by the patient after multiple anterosuperior rehabilitation with seven single cemented crowns type FP2, responsible for the lispting, reversing the prosthetic rehabilitation in four FP3 splinted and screwed crowns with palatal flange. Initially, the patient was unsatisfied with an upper removable partial denture. After the planning and execution of the surgical phase with eight osseointegrated implants, the osseointegration period occurred with the installation of seven single cemented crowns classified as FP2. During the adaptation period, the patient reported rattling during speech due to the passage of air in the cervical interdental region of the implant-supported prostheses (ISP), corresponding to teeth elements 22 to 12. When identifying the crowns responsible for the rattling, we elaborated a new plan with a FP3 splinted and screwed to guarantee reversibility, plus artificial cervical gum in the palatal region, called flange, replacing the lost anatomical crown and soft tissues. Several factors can result in phonetic changes; in the presented case, the multiple upper anterior prosthetic rehabilitation associated with the existence of a pronounced ogival palate and a thin gingival profile of the patient resulted in the development of whistling. The prosthetic conversion of crowns from FP2 to FP3 with palatal flange ensuring air locking between the cervical region of the FP proved satisfactory in resolving the condition of phonetic alteration, rehabilitating the lost phonemes.

Author Biographies

Kátia Denise da Silva Ribeiro Gamba Dias, Universidade do Grande Rio

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade do Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO), Brasil.

Manuela Ferreira Manhães de Oliveira, Universidade do Grande Rio

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade do Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO), Brasil

Elis Regina Nunes de Almeida Valentim, Universidade do Grande Rio

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia da Universidade do Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO), Brasil

Fabiano Luiz Heggendorn, Universidade do Grande Rio

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia da Universidade do Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO), Brasil.

References

Bannwart, L. C., Dekon, S. F. C., Pereira, L. V., & Pellizzer, E. P. (2012). Higienização em prótese sobre implante. Revista odontológica de Araçatuba, 33(1), 32-36.

Bezerra, F. J. B., & Rocha, P. V. B. (1999). Screw-retained Prosthesis versus Cemented Prosthesis. Use of ceramic inlays to obture the oclusal gold screw access conduit. Journal innovations, 3(1), 6-10.

Bornstein, M. M., Cionca, N., & Mombelli, A. (2009). Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy. The international Journal of oral e maxillofacial implants, 24(4), 12-27.

Buser, D., & Von, A. R. X. T. (2000). Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Revista clinic oral implants, 11(1), 83-100.

Cardos, M. C. A. F., & Bujes, R. V. (2010). A saúde bucal e as funções da mastigação e deglutição nos idosos. Estudo internacional Envelhecimento, 15(3), 53-67.

Carvalho, J. C. M., Dias, R. B., Mattos, B. S. C., & André, M. (2013). Reabilitação Protética Craniomaxilofacial. Santos – São Paulo.

Cunha, C. C., Felício, C. M., & Bataglion, C. (1999). Condições miofuncionais orais em usuários de prótese totais. Pró Fono: Revista de Atualização Científica, 11(1): 21-6.

Dario, L. J. (1996). Implant Angulation and Position and Screw or Cement Retention: Clinical Guidelines. Implant Dentistry. Baltimore, 5(2), 101-104.

Felício, C. M., & Cunha, C. C. (2005). Relações entre condições mio funcionais orais e adaptação de próteses totais. Revista íbero Americana de Prótese Clinica e Laboratorial, 36(1), 195-202.

Gervais, M. J., & Wilson, P. R. (2007). A rationale for retrievability of fixed, implant- supported prostheses: a complication-based analysis. Internacional Journal Prosthodont,20(5),13-24.

Hebel, K., & Gajjar, R. C. (1997). Cemented-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 77(10), 28-35.

Jenkis, G. N. (1970). The physiology of the mouth. (3rd ed.): Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Kallus, T., & Bessing, C. (1996).Loose gold screw frequently occur in full-arch fixed prosthesis supported by Osseointegrated implants after 5 years. The international Journal of oral e maxillofacial implants, 9(1), 169-178.

Lewgoy, H. R., Matson, M. R., Matsushita, M. M., Forger, S. I., Tortamano, P., & Joly, J. C. (2012). Estabelecimento de um protocolo de higienização para prevenção da mucosites e priimplantites. Implantnews. ImplantNews, 9(1), 11-9.

Lemos, C. A. A., Souza, V. E., Almeida, D. A. F., Santiago, J. F., Verri, F. R., & Pellizzer, E. P.(2016). Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss. Journal Prosthetic Dental, 115(4), 419-27.

Martone, A. L. (1962). The phenomenon of function in complete denture prosthodontics. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 12(5), 817-34.

Meyer, M., & Silverman. (1967). The whistle and swish sound in denture patients.The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1967; 17(2): 144-148

Misch, C. E. (2015).Prótese sobre Implantes Dentais. (2nd. ed.): Elsevier, 2015

Morais, A., Esteves, C. M, Dias, R. O., Rodrigues, J. A., Reis, A. F., & Duarte, P. M. (2010). Cirurgia plástica periodontal para otimização de resultados estéticos na região anterior. Revista de Associação Paulista Cirurgiões Dentistas, 10(2), 104-11.

Nakamura, D. M., Pimentel, M. L., Coto, N. P., & Dias, R. B. (2020). Quality of Life and Maxillary Defects: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal Odontostomatologic, 2(1), 67-72.

Pereira, A., Shitsuka, D., Parreira, F., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica.Santa Maria

Roumanas, E. D. (2009). The social solution-denture esthetics, phonetics, and function. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 18(2), 112-5

Teixeira, E. R., Mezzomo, E., & Suzuki, R. M. (2006). Implantes Dentários na Reabilitação Oral. Reabilitação Oral Contemporânea. São Paulo: Santos. 11(2), 401-441.

Van, L. K., Browaeys, H., Corthals, P., Mussche, P., Van, K. E., & Bruym, H. (2012).Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behavior in subjects with single-tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prosthesis. Journal Oral Rehabilitation, 39(1), 258-93.

Weir, F. S. (2008).Relating tooth positions in full dentures to the oral vestibule to obtain accuracy of speech, esthetics and anatomic function. The journal of the American Dental Association, 19(1), 1706-14.

Wittneben, J. G., Joda, T., Weber, H. P., & Brägger, U. (2017). Screw retained VS. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis. Periodontol,73(1), 141-51.

Winkler, S. (1987). Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics. (2nd ed.): Mosby.

Zarb, G. A., Mohl, N. D., Mackay, H. F., Carlsson, G. W., & Rugh, J. D. (1998). Deglutition: respirantion and speech. A textbook of occlusion. Chicago: Quintessence,3(5), 153-60.

Downloads

Published

16/07/2022

How to Cite

ALMEIDA, E. C. de; DIAS, K. D. da S. R. G. .; OLIVEIRA, M. F. M. . de; VALENTIM, E. R. N. de A. .; HEGGENDORN, F. L. Prosthetic solution for whistling in fixed prostheses on implants: a case report. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 9, p. e50311932025, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i9.32025. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32025. Acesso em: 24 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences