Obstetric ultrasound in the first trimester: Review of recommendations and limitations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i11.50026Keywords:
Obstetric ultrasound, Pregnancy, First trimester.Abstract
This article aims to review the current recommendations and limitations of obstetric ultrasound in the first trimester, emphasizing its relevance for early diagnosis, maternal-fetal monitoring, and anomaly screening. A narrative literature review was conducted using the BVS and PubMed/MEDLINE databases, in addition to analyzing guidelines from SOGIRGS, the Brazilian Medical Association, and the Ministry of Health. Articles published in the last five years, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, were included. The results show that early ultrasound is essential for the diagnosis and prediction of pregnancy outcomes, with high accuracy for detecting major malformations between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation. However, limitations such as operator dependence, technological variability, and the risk of false diagnoses highlight the need for caution. It is concluded that the exam is indispensable in prenatal care but should be interpreted as a complementary tool, with standardized protocols, professional training, and continuous updates of clinical guidelines.
References
ACOG. (2025). ACOG Clinical Practice Update: Coding, Billing, and Clinician Training for Detailed Fetal Anatomy Ultrasound in the First Trimester. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 143(6), 1111-4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005495.
AMB. (2020). Ultrassonografia no Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez. Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB).
Bollig, K. J. & Schust, D. J. (2020). Refining angular pregnancy diagnosis in the first trimester: a case series of expectant management. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 135(1), 175-84 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003595. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Danny-Schust/publication/337803313_Refining_Angular_Pregnancy_Diagnosis_in_the_First_Trimester_A_Case_Series_of_Expectant_Management/links/652403a63ab6cb4ec6d018ee/Refining-Angular-Pregnancy-Diagnosis-in-the-First-Trimester-A-Case-Series-of-Expectant-Management.pdf.
Bromley, B. & Platt, L. D. (2024). First-trimester obstetric ultrasonography in routine practice. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 143(6), 731-41. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005452.
Brown, I. et al. (2021). Ultrasound findings and detection of fetal abnormalities before 11 weeks of gestation. Prenatal Diagnosis. 41(13), 1675-84. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6055. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6055. Acesso em: 27 set. 2025.
Brown, I., Rolnik, D. L., Fernando, S. et al. (2020). Ultrasound findings and detection of fetal abnormalities before 11 weeks of gestation. Prenatal Diagnosis. 40(8), 1062–70. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6055. https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/rest/bitstreams/835d072c-7eff-5c80-844d-04ec01db4416/retrieve.
Buijtendijk, M. C. et al. (2024). First‐ and second‐trimester ultrasound for detection of fetal structural anomalies in unselected and low‐risk populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, n. 5, art. no. CD013455, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013455.pub2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38721874/.
Buijtendijk, M. F. et al. (2024). Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024(5), CD014715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38721874/.
El-Achi, V. et al. (2020). First-trimester prediction of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 47(8), 624–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000506541.
Hamel, C. et al. (2024). Canadian Association of Radiologists Obstetrics and Gynecology Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 75(2), 261-8. DOI: 10.1177/08465371231185292. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37624360.
Hu, J. et al. (2021). Prospective evaluation of first‐trimester screening strategy for preterm pre‐eclampsia and its clinical applicability in China. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 58(4), 529–39. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23645. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23645.
Karim, J. N. et al. (2024). Detection of non-cardiac fetal anomalies at the 11–14-week scan: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 63(4), 430–46. DOI: 10.1002/uog.26512. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38547384/.
Karim, J. N. et al. (2022). First trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 59(1), 11–25.
Matarrelli, B. et al. (2025). Outcome of fetuses with early increased nuchal translucency: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 66(2), 147-54. DOI: 10.1002/uog.29260. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40519157.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J. & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. Santa Maria: Editora da UFSM
Ramos, D., Santiago, J. C., Castillo, M. J. & Montoya, F. (2021). Fetal soft tissue edema and nuchal region with septations: Case report. Research, Society and Development. 10(6), e43936. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i6.43936. https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/43936/36338.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática versus revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo. 20(2), v–vi.
Salomon, L. J. et al. (2024). Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (Issue 2), Art. No.: CD014715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2.
Salvesen, K. et al. (2021). ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler for fetal ultrasound examination in the first 13 + 6 weeks of pregnancy (updated). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 57, 1020. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23610.
https://www.isuog.org/static/50ee8d91-0264-4343-970b33f730b6508e/ISUOG-Safety-Statement-on-Doppler.pdf. Acesso em: 27 set. 2025.
Schiffer, V. et al. (2020). Spiral artery blood flow during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1), 680. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03150-0. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33176723.
Shainker, S. A. et al. (2021). Relatório Especial da Sociedade de Medicina Materno-Fetal Placenta Accreta Spectrum Ultrasound Marker Task Force: Consenso sobre definição de marcadores e abordagem do exame de ultrassom em gestações com risco de espectro de placenta acreta. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 224(1), B2-B14,. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.001. Errata em: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 225(1):91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.012.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 104, 333–9.
SOGIRGS. (2025). Ultrassonografia no Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez. SOCIEDADE DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL (SOGIRGS). https://sogirgs.org.br/area-do-associado/ultrassonografia-no-primeiro-trimestre-da-gravidez.pdf.
SOGIRGS; Bilardo, C. M., Chaoui, R., Hyett, J. A., Kagan, K. O., Karim, J. N., Papageorghiou, A. T.; POON, L. C., Salomon, L. J., Syngelaki, A. & Nicolaides, K. H. (2023). Diretrizes práticas da ISUOG (atualizadas): realização de ultrassonografia de 11 a 14 semanas. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 61, 127-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26106.
Timor-Tritsch, I. E., Monteagudo, A. & Goldstein, S. R. (2024). Early first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound screening for cesarean scar pregnancy in patients with previous cesarean delivery: analysis of the evidence. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 230, 618-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.041.
Umans, E. et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Imaging in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 51(4), 343-56. DOI: 10.1159/000538243. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38493764.
Van Eekhout, J. C. A. et al. (2025). First-trimester prediction models based on maternal characteristics for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 132(3), 243–65. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17983. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17983. Acesso em: 27 set. 2025.
Vena, F. et al. (2022). Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in pregnancy with diagnosis of chorionic bump on first-trimester sonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 35(25), 8897–904. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2006627. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34809513/.
Yu, L. et al. (2023). Diagnostic performance of first-trimester ultrasound for cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenatal Diagnosis. 43(1), 16–26, jan. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6266. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37307333/.
Zhang, L., Zhang, Y. & Yan, Y. (2023). The value of nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasonography for fetal malformation screening. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, v. 28, n. 2, p. 157–161, fev. 2025.
Zhi, R. et al. Association between transabdominal uterine artery Doppler and small-for-gestational-age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 23(1), 659. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05968-w. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37704965.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lucas Froeseler de Lara Resende, Luiza Azevedo Cançado Grisolia, Raphaella Fernanda Reis, Vinícius Amorim Gonçalves, Márcio José Rosa Requeijo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
