Evaluation of the effectiveness of distance training in Lean Six Sigma Black Belt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i12.50463Keywords:
Distance learning, Lean Six Sigma, Black Belt, Efficiency.Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of distance learning Lean Six Sigma training using the Método CPA. The search for distance learning has increased at an exponentially never seen speed, due to the recent pandemic events. In this sense, there is a reaction from educational institutions seeking to meet this demand. These institutions seek to meet students' expectations, train them for the corporate world and compete equally in the market. The subject becomes pertinent to our reality as more students opt for this type of teaching. Mainly seeking versatility in teaching time and physical location, efficiency in learning and practical application in companies of the concepts learned in classes. The development of this research will give us an insight into distance learning and its necessary immersion in society, which is not fully defined. In this way, online Lean Six Sigma Black Belt training will be presented through the company Método CPA. This training is considered a professional course, not falling within technical education, undergraduate or postgraduate studies, therefore it does not require accreditation and supervision from the MEC (Ministry of Education). We will follow all the content of the Lean Six Sigma Black Belt training, its practical relevance within companies and its results with its students, thus positioning ourselves in a general way on this topic. The expected result is to share the training structure to contextualize the research field, demonstrate the results, student evaluation data and completion time, identify coherences and divergences, obtain practical professional results from the application of the Lean Six Sigma methodology and finally contribute to the improvement of distance training in educational institutions.
References
Aun, M. (2012). É o cliente que importa. Sextante.
Azevedo Júnior, J. (2016). Fundamentos da qualidade. SENAI-SP.
Borba, M. C., Malheiros, A. P. S., & Amaral, R. B. (2021). Educação a distância online. Autêntica.
Chiavenato, I. (2022). Administração: teoria, processo e prática. Atlas.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Investigação Qualitativa e Projeto de Pesquisa: Escolhendo entre Cinco Abordagens (3 ed.). Penso.
DeToro, I., & MacCabe, T. (1997). How to stay flexible and elud fads. . Quality Progress.
Gestão de processos: abordagem da administração moderna. (2023). Research, Society and Development, 12(2), e1812239906. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i2.39906
Gestão escolar: Administração, supervisão, orientação e inspeção no decorrer da história da educação. (2024). Research, Society and Development, 13(9), e6213946820. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i9.46820
Gil, A. C. (2024). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social (7 ed.). Atlas.
Haq, J., & Lipol, L. S. (2011). Risk analysis method: FMEA/FMECA in the organizations. IJBAS/IJENS.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Lucio, M. del P. B. (2013). Metodologia de Pesquisa. Penso.
Lean Enterprise Institute. (2003). Léxico Lean – Glossário Ilustrado para Praticantes do Pensamento Lean. Lean Institute Brasil.
Mani, G. M., & de Pádua, F. S. M. ([s.d.]). Lean seis sigma. Revista Interface Tecnológica, 115–126.
Martins, P. G., & Laugeni, F. P. (2005). Administração da produção. Saraiva.
Metrópolis. (2024). Em 5 anos, número de cursos de graduação EaD cresceu mais de 232%. https://www.metropoles.com/brasil/em-5-anos-numero-de-cursos-de-graduacao-ead-cresceu-mais-de-232.
Ohno, T. (1997). Sistema Toyota de Produção: além da produção em larga escala. . Bookman.
Oliveira, D. de P. R. (2006). Administração de processos. Atlas.
Question Pro. (2024). População e amostra: qual a diferença? Saiba aqui! https://www.questionpro.com/blog/pt-br/populacao-e-amostra/
Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. (Free ebook). Santa Maria. Editora da UFSM.
Samperi, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, M. P. B. (2013). Metodologia de Pesquisa. Penso.
Santos, A. C. (2011). Análise dos modos de falhas no desenvolvimento de novos produtos de SVA: Uma abordagem para a indústria de telecomunicações. Faculdade de Economia Universidade de Coimbra.
Sardinha, G. P., Claro, F. A., & Pereira, R. L. (2009). Uso combinado do AHP e do FMEA para análise de riscos em gerenciamento de projetos. SEGeT – Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão e Tecnologia.
Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management.
Shitsuka, R. et al. (2014). Matemática fundamental para tecnologia (2ed). Editora Érica.
Silva, L. C. da. (2015). Gestão e Melhoria de Processos: conceitos, práticas e ferramentas. Brasport.
Silvestre, A. L. (2007). Análise de dados e estatística descritiva. Escolar editora.
Sordi, J. O. de. (2022). Gestão de processos: uma abordagem moderna da administração. Alta Books.
Taylor, F. W. (1990). Princípios de administração científica. Atlas.
Tori, R. (2017). Educação sem distância: as tecnologias interativas na redução de distâncias em ensino e aprendizagem. Artesanato Educacional.
Uma iniciativa de educação profissional para a construção de carreira dos alunos de Administração. (2022). Research, Society and Development, 11(2), e58411225991. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25991
Utama, D. M., & Abirfatin, M. (2023). Sustainable Lean Six-sigma: A new framework for improve sustainable manufacturing performance. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100700
Werkema, C. (2021a). Ferramentas estatísticas básicas do lean seis sigma integradas ao pdca e dmaic. Atlas.
Werkema, C. (2021b). Lean seis sigma: introdução às ferramentas do lean manufacturing. Atlas.
Widiwati, I. T. B., Liman, S. D., & Nurprihatin, F. (2024). The implementation of Lean Six Sigma approach to minimize waste at a food manufacturing industry. Journal of Engineering Research (Kuwait). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.022
Wildauer, E. W., & Wildauer, L. D. B. S. (2015). Mapeamento de processos: conceitos, técnicas e ferramentas. Intersaberes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Douglas da Silva Saito, Rodrigo Florêncio da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
