Human Rights Violations in Brazilian Prisons and the Role of the Brazilian Supreme Court and of the National Council of Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.22420Keywords:
Human Rights; Prisons; Brazilian Supreme Court; Brazilian National Council of Justice; Prisoners.Abstract
This research aims to assess the role of the Brazilian Judicial Power in the protection of human rights in prisons, in the light of the actions of the STF and the ‘National Council of Justice’ (CNJ). Initially, from the division of Powers in the Brazilian State, it is conducted a survey of the competences in the Brazilian State to the management of prisons and to the protection of human rights in prisons; subsequently, it is studied the role of the Judiciary in protecting these rights, based on the analysis of the STF and the CNJ actions. As a result, initially, it was found that the violation of human rights in prisons is not something new in Brazil and it reflects other structural problems in Brazilian society, such as the great social inequality and the systemic racism. This violence is worst to women and to sexual minorities, due to either action or omission from the State institutions. In the end, it was found that the STF has important decisions in favor of the protection of the human rights in prisons; however, some decisions of the same court, which toughen incarceration measures, have had an impact on the worsening of the chaotic situation of the Brazilian prison system. Additionally, the CNJ played an important role in monitoring and promoting the protection of human rights in prisons. The method applied in the development of the research is the inductive method, by which it tries to reach a general conclusion from particular data.
References
Banco Nacional de Monitoramento de Prisões. (n.d.). Cadastro Nacional de Presos. https://portalbnmp.cnj.jus.br/#/estatisticas
Brazil. (1984). Law of Penal Execution - Act n. 7.210, 11st July 1984. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7210.htm
Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. (2018). Anuário Brasileiro de Segurança Pública - 2014 a 2017. https://www.forumseguranca.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/FBSP_ABSP_edicao_especial_estados_faccoes_2018.pdf
Fundo Penitenciário Nacional. (2021). Departamento Penitenciário Nacional. Retrieved March 09, 2021, from https://www.gov.br/depen/pt-br/assuntos/funpen#:~:text=O%20Fundo%20Penitenci%C3%A1rio%20Nacional%20%2D%20Funpen,e%20apoiar%20as%20atividades%20e
GOFFMAN, E. (2001). Manicômios, Prisões e Conventos. Editora Perspectiva.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. (1969, November 22). American Convention on Human Rights. https://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/basic3.american%20convention.htm
Ministério Público do Rio Grande do Sul. (2017). Grupo Temático da Execução Criminal - Fiscalização de Estabelecimentos Penais. https://www.mppi.mp.br/internet/wp-content/uploads//2020/04/cartilha_fiscalizacao_01.pdf
National Council of Justice. (n.d.). Attention Policy for Persons Leaving the Prison System (Social Offices). National COuoncil of Justice. https://www.cnj.jus.br/sistema-carcerario/politica-de-atencao-a-pessoas-egressas-do-sistema-prisional-escritorios-sociais/
National Council of Justice. (n.d.). Custody Hearings. National Council of Justice. https://www.cnj.jus.br/sistema-carcerario/audiencia-de-custodia/
National Council of Justice. (n.d.). Doing Justice - About the Program. National COurt of Justice. https://www.cnj.jus.br/sistema-carcerario/fazendo-justica/sobre-o-programa/
National Council of Justice. (n.d.). Prison Task Force. National COuncil of Justice. https://www.cnj.jus.br/sistema-carcerario/mutirao-carcerario/
National COuncil of Justice. (n.d.). Restorative Justice. National COuncil of Justice. https://www.cnj.jus.br/programas-e-acoes/justica-restaurativa/
National Council of Justice. (n.d.). Who we are. National Council of Justice. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://www.cnj.jus.br/sobre-o-cnj/quem-somos/
National Council of Justice. (2017, October 11). Number of women prisoners multiplies by eight in 16 years. https://www.cnj.jus.br/numero-de-mulheres-presas-multiplica-por-oito-em-16-anos/#:~:text=Com%20o%20Marco%20Legal%20da,de%20at%C3%A9%2012%20anos%20incompletos.
National Council of Justice. (2018). Pre-trial detainees: Piauí reduces rate of detainees awaiting trial. National Council of Justice. https://www.cnj.jus.br/presos-provisorios-piaui-reduz-taxa-de-detentos-a-espera-de-julgamento/
National Council of Justice. (2019). CNJ registry registers 685 pregnant or lactating women arrested. https://www.cnj.jus.br/cadastro-do-cnj-registra-685-mulheres-gravidas-ou-lactantes-presas/#:~:text=O%20Cadastro%20Nacional%20de%20Presas,s%C3%A3o%20gr%C3%A1vidas%20e%20265%2C%20lactantes.
National Council of public ministry. (n.d.). Manual de Inspeção a Unidades Prisionais. CNMP. https://www.cnmp.mp.br/portal/images/Publicacoes/documentos/2019/Manual_-_Formatado.pdf
National Council of Public Ministry. (2020). A Visão do Ministério Público sobre o Sistema Prisional brasileiro (Vol. IV). CNMP. CNMP
Reis, E. R. C. (1995). A privatização das prisões sob a ótica do direito administrativo. Revista dos Tribunais.
Supreme Federal Court. (2019). Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Secretaria de Documentação. http://www.stf.jus.br/arquivo/ cms/legislacaoConstituicao/anexo/CF_ingles.pdf
Supremo Tribunal Federal. (2016). Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental n. 347.
United Nations. (1976). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Guilherme Aresi Madruga Lopes; Juliana Roman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
