Inteligência Artificial na Gestão de Recursos Humanos: Uma revisão sobre impactos organizacionais e psicológicos

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i4.50948

Palavras-chave:

Inteligência Artificial, Gestão de Recursos Humanos, People Analytics, Justiça Organizacional, Contrato Psicológico.

Resumo

A incorporação de ferramentas baseadas em Inteligência Artificial (IA) na Gestão de Recursos Humanos tem transformado a forma como organizações recrutam, avaliam e retêm pessoas. Processos historicamente apoiados em julgamento subjetivo passam a contar com sistemas capazes de processar grandes volumes de dados e identificar padrões comportamentais. Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar, por meio de revisão narrativa sistemática, as principais contribuições e desafios da IA na Gestão de Recursos Humanos (GRH), com foco nos efeitos sobre a percepção de justiça organizacional, a confiança institucional e o contrato psicológico. A metodologia envolveu busca nas bases Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO e SciELO, com recorte temporal entre 2010 e 2025. Os resultados indicam que, embora a IA amplie a capacidade analítica e melhore indicadores operacionais, sua implementação carrega riscos relevantes: reprodução de vieses históricos, erosão da percepção de justiça procedimental e ruptura do contrato psicológico quando os critérios algorítmicos não são comunicados de forma transparente. Conclui-se que os benefícios organizacionais da IA são reais, mas condicionais à existência de estruturas robustas de governança de dados, diretrizes éticas explícitas e compromisso com a preservação do julgamento humano nas decisões de maior impacto.

Referências

Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016, maio 23). Machine bias. ProPublica.

https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

Ball, K. (2010). Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labor History, 51(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00236561003654776

Bankins, S., Formosa, P., Griep, Y., & Judge, D. (2022). AI decision-making and the psychological contract: Exploring perceptions of fairness and trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000932

Barocas, S., & Hardt, M. (2017). Fairness in machine learning. NeurIPS Tutorial. https://fairmlbook.org

Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Mack, K., & Costa, A. B. (2021). Applicant reactions to artificial intelligence in selection: Antecedents and consequences. In S. Tippins, N. Tippins, & R. Oswald (Eds.), Technology-enhanced assessment of talent (pp. 120–149). Jossey-Bass.

Cheng, M. M., & Hackett, R. D. (2021). A critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice. Human Resource Management Review, 31(1), 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100698

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

Dastin, J. (2018, outubro 10). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G

Diab, D. L., Pui, S. Y., Yankelevich, M., & Highhouse, S. (2011). Lay perceptions of selection decision aids in U.S. and non-U.S. samples. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00548.x

Hmoud, B., & Laszlo, V. (2019). Will artificial intelligence take over human resources recruitment and selection? Network Intelligence Studies, 7(13), 21–30.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13, 795–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w

Langer, M., König, C. J., & Papathanasiou, M. (2019). Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12246

Lee, M. K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684

Brasil. (2018). Lei n.º 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Presidência da República, Casa Civil. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm

Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2017). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Nankervis, A., Connell, J., Cameron, R., & Montague, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and human resource management in emerging economies: Disruption, adaptation and governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 62(1), e12380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12380

Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342

Raub, M. (2021). Bots, bias and big data: Artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias and disparate impact liability in hiring practices. Arkansas Law Review, 71(2), 529–570.

Risemberg, R. I. C., et al. (2026). A importância da metodologia científica no desenvolvimento de artigos científicos. E-Acadêmica, 7(1), e0171675. https://eacademica.org/eacademica/article/view/675

Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Selbst, A. D., & Barocas, S. (2018). The intuitive appeal of explainable machines. Fordham Law Review, 87(3), 1085–1139.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Tursunbayeva, A., Pagliari, C., Di Lauro, S., & Antonucci, G. (2022). The ethics of people analytics: Risks, opportunities and recommendations. Personnel Review, 51(3), 900–921. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2019-0680

van den Heuvel, S., & Bondarouk, T. (2017). The rise (and fall) of HR analytics: A study into the future application, value, structure, and system support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2017-0022

Vargas, R., Yurrebaso, A., & Blasco, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in human resource management: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100052

Downloads

Publicado

2026-04-18

Edição

Seção

Artigos de Revisão

Como Citar

Inteligência Artificial na Gestão de Recursos Humanos: Uma revisão sobre impactos organizacionais e psicológicos. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 4, p. e5515450948, 2026. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v15i4.50948. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/50948. Acesso em: 2 maio. 2026.