Systematic review on the neurological impacts of congenital Zika Virus infection: Pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical implications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i10.49687

Keywords:

Zika virus, Neurology, Newborns, Congenital infection, Central Nervous System.

Abstract

Congenital Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is intrinsically linked to severe neurological impairments in newborns, with significant repercussions on child development. This systematic review, based on observational and experimental studies (2015-2024), investigated the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical implications of this condition. The results demonstrate that ZIKV preferentially infects neural progenitor cells (NPCs) by interacting with receptors (AXL, TAM, DC-SIGN), triggering apoptosis, TLR3-mediated inflammation, and disruption of neurogenesis. These processes result in malformations such as microcephaly (present in 96% of cases), intracranial calcifications (93%), ventriculomegaly (78%), and dysgenesis of the corpus callosum, identifiable by imaging techniques (CT/MRI). A longitudinal analysis revealed long-term consequences: 31.5% of children presented neuropsychomotor delays at 18 months, with motor, cognitive, and sensory deficits (hearing/visual loss in 30%), as well as refractory epilepsy and arthrogryposis. Promising strategies include vector control with Wolbachia, vaccines (ZPIV, mRNA) under development, and antivirals such as sofosbuvir, which reduced viral replication in experimental models. The conclusion is that the integration of early imaging, neuroprotective therapies, and multidisciplinary approaches is crucial to mitigating neurological damage, reinforcing the need for public policies focused on epidemiological surveillance and early rehabilitation.

References

Araujo, L. M. et al. (2018). Association Between Infants Exposed to ZIKV and Abnormal Neurodevelopmental Outcomes. JAMA Pediatrics. 172(10), 982-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2022.

Brasil, P. et al. (2016). Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro. The New England Journal of Medicine. 375(24), 2321–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602412.

Christian, K. M., Song, H. & Ming, G. (2019). Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Zika Virus Infection in the Nervous System. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 42(1), 249–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062231.

Cugola, F. R. et al. (2016). The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature. 534(7606), 267–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18296.

Eickmann, S. H. et al. (2016). Síndrome da infecção congênita pelo vírus Zika. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 32(7), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00047716.

Ferraris, P., Yssel, H. & Missé, D. (2019). Zika virus infection: an update. Microbes and Infection. 21(8-9), 353–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2019.04.005.

Garcez, P. P. et al. (2016). Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science. 352(6287), 816-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6116.

Hazin, A. N. et al. (2016). Computed Tomographic Findings in Microcephaly Associated with Zika Virus. The New England Journal of Medicine. 374(22), 2193-5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1603617.

Miranda-Filho, D. B. et al. (2016). Initial Description of the Presumed Congenital Zika Syndrome. American Journal of Public Health. 106(4), 598-600. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303115.

MLAkar, J. et al. (2016). Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. The New England Journal of Medicine. 374(10), 951-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600651.

Page, M. J. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372(71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM.

Pielnaa, P. et al. (2020). Zika virus-spread, epidemiology, genome, transmission cycle, clinical manifestation, associated challenges, vaccine and antiviral drug development. Virology. 543, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2020.01.015.

Van der Linden, V. et al. (2018). Association Between Microcephaly, Zika Virus Infection, and Other Risk Factors in Brazil: Final Report of a Case-Control Study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 18(3), 328-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30727-2.

Wang, J.-N. & Ling, F. (2016). Zika Virus Infection and Microcephaly: Evidence for a Causal Link. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 13(10), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13101031.

Published

2025-10-10

Issue

Section

Health Sciences

How to Cite

Systematic review on the neurological impacts of congenital Zika Virus infection: Pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical implications. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 10, p. e56141049687, 2025. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v14i10.49687. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/49687. Acesso em: 9 dec. 2025.