Reflection of the superior court of justice's jurisprudence on personal searches in Military Police activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i11.49887Keywords:
Stop and Search, Personal Search, Reasonable Suspicion, Military Police.Abstract
The police stop is the most common point of contact between the Military Police and the citizen. It is carried out as a preventive action based on reasonable suspicion and police intuition. Grounded in Article 244 of the Brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure (CPP), this procedure is conditioned upon the existence of reasonable suspicion that the individual is in possession of illicit objects, prohibited weapons, or evidence related to crimes. The general objective of this study was to analyze, through legal doctrine and jurisprudence, the impacts of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) decision on personal searches and police stops. The results indicate that, according to the STJ decision—specifically by its Sixth Panel—personal or vehicle searches without a judicial warrant, based solely on the officer’s subjective impression of a person’s appearance or behavior, are deemed illegal. After reviewing the relevant legislation, legal doctrine, and jurisprudence, it is clear that this decision significantly hinders the actions of the Military Police, considering that the technical aspects of the stop—taught during training and specialization—are based on behavioral traits and operational experience. Nonetheless, experience cannot replace proper training, which serves as a foundation for the recurring interventions of the Military Police.
References
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo (Edição revista e ampliada). Edições 70.
Boni, M. L. (2006). Cidadania e poder de polícia na abordagem policial (Dissertação de Mestrado). Faculdade de Direito de Campos – FDC, Campos, RJ.
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal.
Brasil. (1941). Código de Processo Penal (Decreto-Lei nº 3.689, de 3 de outubro de 1941). https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del3689.htm.
Brasil. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. (2022). Habeas Corpus nº 598.051. https://www.conjur.com.br/dl/policiais-gravar-autorizacao-morador.pdf
Brasil. Supremo Tribunal Federal. (2022). Recurso Extraordinário (RE) 603616. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/stf/864040028
Brasil. Supremo Tribunal Federal. (2022). Recurso Extraordinário (RE) 1342077.
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/stf/1335771520/inteiro-teor-1335771538
Gonsalves, E. P. (2003). Iniciação à pesquisa científica (3ª ed.). Campinas, SP: Editora Alínea.
Lazzarini, Á. (2007). Estudos de Direito Administrativo (8ª ed.). São Paulo, SP: Revista dos Tribunais.
Meirelles, H. L. (2016). Direito Administrativo Brasileiro (36ª ed., atual.). São Paulo, SP: Editora Saraiva.
Minas Gerais. Polícia Militar. (1999). Manual básico de policiamento ostensivo. Belo Horizonte, MG: PMMG.
Nassaro, A. L. F. (2005). A busca pessoal preventiva e a busca pessoal processual. Força Policial, 12(45), 23–33.
Nucci, G. S. (2019). Código de Processo Penal comentado (16ª ed., rev., atual. e ampl.). São Paulo, SP: Revista dos Tribunais.
Pinc, T. M. (2006). O uso da força não letal pela Polícia nos encontros com o público (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8131/tde-28052007-151500/
Ramos, S., & Musumeci, L. (2004). “Elemento suspeito”: Abordagem policial e discriminação na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Boletim Segurança e Cidadania, 3(08). http://www.ucam.edu.br/cesec/publicacoes/zip/boletim08.pdf
São Paulo. Polícia Militar. (1999). Manual de instrução modular da Polícia Militar do Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP: PMESP.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Franklin Melo dos Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
