Anatomical bone differences between the male and female faces: A narrative literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i11.50057Keywords:
Face, Anatomy, Facial Bones.Abstract
The human face is fundamental for communication, identity, and social interaction, composed of 14 bones that support physiological functions. Throughout evolution, a reduction in prognathism and tooth size was observed, resulting in more retruded facial structures, reflecting dietary, behavioral, and cultural adaptations. In this context, facial sexual dimorphism is a key element for understanding structural differences between men and women, with clinical, anthropological, and forensic relevance. This narrative review aimed to analyze these skeletal particularities in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the face, considering anatomical and aesthetic implications. The methodology consisted of searching scientific articles in the PubMed and SciELO databases. Results show that men exhibit greater glabellar projection, frontal robustness, and wider orbits, while women display smoother contours and smaller bone dimensions in the upper third. In the middle third, men have larger zygomatic measurements and narrower nasal cavities, whereas women present wider piriform openings, with relevant ethnic variations. In the lower third, the male mandible is more angled and robust, with greater projection and cortical thickness. These differences guide orofacial harmonization procedures, where feminization softens structures and masculinization emphasizes contours. It is concluded that skeletal anatomical differences reflect a complex interplay of evolutionary, functional, and aesthetic factors, whose understanding is essential for contemporary clinical, forensic, and scientific applications.
References
Ajanović, Z., Ajanović, U., Dervišević, L., Hot, H., Voljevica, A., Talović, E., et al. (2023). A geometric morphometrics approach for sex estimation based on the orbital region of human skulls from Bosnian population.
Arthanari, A., Sureshbabu, S., Ramalingam, K., et al. (2024). Role of mandibular parameters in gender determination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus, 16(5), e59965. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59965
Bannister, J. J., Juszczak, H., Aponte, J. D., et al. (2022). Sex differences in adult facial three-dimensional morphology: Application to gender-affirming facial surgery. Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine, 24(Suppl. 2), S-24. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0301
Bastir, M. (2006). Evolutionary significance of craniofacial variation and modularity.
Bulut, O., Petaros, A., Hizliol, I., Wärmländer, S. K. T. S., & Hekimoglu, B. (2016). Sexual dimorphism in frontal bone roundness quantified by a novel 3D-based and landmark-free method. Forensic Science International.
Campos, J. H. (2021). Visagismo, dimorfismo sexual, proporção áurea e simetria como bases sólidas para alterações imagéticas. AOS – Arquivos de Odontologia e Saúde, 2(2), 74–90.
Del Bove, A., Menéndez, L., Manzi, G., & et al. (2023). Mapping sexual dimorphism signal in the human cranium. Scientific Reports, 13, 16847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43007-y
De Maio, M. (2015). The art of facial harmonization.
Fan Y, Penington A, Kilpatrick N, et al. Quantification of mandibular sexual dimorphism during adolescence. J Anat. 2019;234(5), 709-717. doi:10.1111/joa.12949
Frank, K., Gotkin, R., Pavicic, T., Morozov, S., Gombolevsky, V., Petraikin, A., et al. (2018). Age and gender differences of the frontal bone: A computed tomographic (CT)-based study.
Garvin, H. M., & Ruff, C. B. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in skeletal morphology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.
Hashim, P. W., Nia, J. K., Taliercio, M., & Goldenberg, G. (2017). Ideals of facial beauty. Cutis, 100(4), 222–224.
Kozerska, M., Kozerska, M., Skrzat, J., & Szczepanek, A. (2015). Application of the temporal bone for sex determination from skeletal remains.
Lacruz, R. S., et al. (2019). Evolution of the human face.
Lima, A. I. C., Silva, R. A., & Almeida Júnior, E. (2016). Analysis between the zygomatic orbital points and anterior nasal spine in the investigation of sex and age in dry adult skulls. J Health Sci Inst, 34(1), 11–16.
Milella, M., Franklin, D., Belcastro, M. G., & Cardini, A. (2021). Sexual differences in human cranial morphology: Is one sex more variable or one region more dimorphic?. Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 304(12), 2789–2810. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24626
Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book gratuito]. Santa Maria/RS. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. 9).
Queiroz, C. C. C., Suguihara, R. T., & Muknicka, D. P. (2023). Self-esteem and the specialty of orofacial harmonization. Research, Society and Development, 12(7), e42584. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i7.42584
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 20(2), 5-6.
Russel, S. M., & Frank-Ito, D. O. (2023). Gender differences in nasal anatomy and function among Caucasians. Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine, 25(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2022.0049
Sarač-Hadžihalilović, A., Ajanović, Z., Hasanbegović, I., et al. (2022). Analysis of gender differences on pyriform aperture of human skulls using geometric morphometric method. Folia Morphologica (Warsz), 81(3), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2021.0080
Shah, R., & Frank-Ito, D. O. (2022). The role of normal nasal morphological variations from race and gender differences on respiratory physiology. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 297, 103823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2021.103823
Sumodjo, P. R. P. A., Suguihara, R. T., & Muknicka, D. P. (2023). Facial aging and orofacial harmonization – a narrative literature review. Research, Society and Development, 12(5), e41591. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41591
Teodoro, R. A. de A., Suguihara, R. T., & Muknicka, D. P. (2023). Aesthetics and the orofacial harmonization. Research, Society and Development, 12(7), e42400. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i7.42400
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafael Pioltine, Talita Priscila Silva da Costa, Mônica Alves Abrahão, Manuela Oliveira Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
