Anatomical bone differences between the male and female faces: A narrative literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i11.50057

Keywords:

Face, Anatomy, Facial Bones.

Abstract

The human face is fundamental for communication, identity, and social interaction, composed of 14 bones that support physiological functions. Throughout evolution, a reduction in prognathism and tooth size was observed, resulting in more retruded facial structures, reflecting dietary, behavioral, and cultural adaptations. In this context, facial sexual dimorphism is a key element for understanding structural differences between men and women, with clinical, anthropological, and forensic relevance. This narrative review aimed to analyze these skeletal particularities in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the face, considering anatomical and aesthetic implications. The methodology consisted of searching scientific articles in the PubMed and SciELO databases. Results show that men exhibit greater glabellar projection, frontal robustness, and wider orbits, while women display smoother contours and smaller bone dimensions in the upper third. In the middle third, men have larger zygomatic measurements and narrower nasal cavities, whereas women present wider piriform openings, with relevant ethnic variations. In the lower third, the male mandible is more angled and robust, with greater projection and cortical thickness. These differences guide orofacial harmonization procedures, where feminization softens structures and masculinization emphasizes contours. It is concluded that skeletal anatomical differences reflect a complex interplay of evolutionary, functional, and aesthetic factors, whose understanding is essential for contemporary clinical, forensic, and scientific applications.

References

Ajanović, Z., Ajanović, U., Dervišević, L., Hot, H., Voljevica, A., Talović, E., et al. (2023). A geometric morphometrics approach for sex estimation based on the orbital region of human skulls from Bosnian population.

Arthanari, A., Sureshbabu, S., Ramalingam, K., et al. (2024). Role of mandibular parameters in gender determination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus, 16(5), e59965. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59965

Bannister, J. J., Juszczak, H., Aponte, J. D., et al. (2022). Sex differences in adult facial three-dimensional morphology: Application to gender-affirming facial surgery. Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine, 24(Suppl. 2), S-24. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0301

Bastir, M. (2006). Evolutionary significance of craniofacial variation and modularity.

Bulut, O., Petaros, A., Hizliol, I., Wärmländer, S. K. T. S., & Hekimoglu, B. (2016). Sexual dimorphism in frontal bone roundness quantified by a novel 3D-based and landmark-free method. Forensic Science International.

Campos, J. H. (2021). Visagismo, dimorfismo sexual, proporção áurea e simetria como bases sólidas para alterações imagéticas. AOS – Arquivos de Odontologia e Saúde, 2(2), 74–90.

Del Bove, A., Menéndez, L., Manzi, G., & et al. (2023). Mapping sexual dimorphism signal in the human cranium. Scientific Reports, 13, 16847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43007-y

De Maio, M. (2015). The art of facial harmonization.

Fan Y, Penington A, Kilpatrick N, et al. Quantification of mandibular sexual dimorphism during adolescence. J Anat. 2019;234(5), 709-717. doi:10.1111/joa.12949

Frank, K., Gotkin, R., Pavicic, T., Morozov, S., Gombolevsky, V., Petraikin, A., et al. (2018). Age and gender differences of the frontal bone: A computed tomographic (CT)-based study.

Garvin, H. M., & Ruff, C. B. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in skeletal morphology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Hashim, P. W., Nia, J. K., Taliercio, M., & Goldenberg, G. (2017). Ideals of facial beauty. Cutis, 100(4), 222–224.

Kozerska, M., Kozerska, M., Skrzat, J., & Szczepanek, A. (2015). Application of the temporal bone for sex determination from skeletal remains.

Lacruz, R. S., et al. (2019). Evolution of the human face.

Lima, A. I. C., Silva, R. A., & Almeida Júnior, E. (2016). Analysis between the zygomatic orbital points and anterior nasal spine in the investigation of sex and age in dry adult skulls. J Health Sci Inst, 34(1), 11–16.

Milella, M., Franklin, D., Belcastro, M. G., & Cardini, A. (2021). Sexual differences in human cranial morphology: Is one sex more variable or one region more dimorphic?. Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 304(12), 2789–2810. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24626

Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book gratuito]. Santa Maria/RS. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. 9).

Queiroz, C. C. C., Suguihara, R. T., & Muknicka, D. P. (2023). Self-esteem and the specialty of orofacial harmonization. Research, Society and Development, 12(7), e42584. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i7.42584

Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 20(2), 5-6.

Russel, S. M., & Frank-Ito, D. O. (2023). Gender differences in nasal anatomy and function among Caucasians. Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine, 25(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2022.0049

Sarač-Hadžihalilović, A., Ajanović, Z., Hasanbegović, I., et al. (2022). Analysis of gender differences on pyriform aperture of human skulls using geometric morphometric method. Folia Morphologica (Warsz), 81(3), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2021.0080

Shah, R., & Frank-Ito, D. O. (2022). The role of normal nasal morphological variations from race and gender differences on respiratory physiology. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 297, 103823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2021.103823

Sumodjo, P. R. P. A., Suguihara, R. T., & Muknicka, D. P. (2023). Facial aging and orofacial harmonization – a narrative literature review. Research, Society and Development, 12(5), e41591. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41591

Teodoro, R. A. de A., Suguihara, R. T., & Muknicka, D. P. (2023). Aesthetics and the orofacial harmonization. Research, Society and Development, 12(7), e42400. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i7.42400

Published

2025-11-14

Issue

Section

Health Sciences

How to Cite

Anatomical bone differences between the male and female faces: A narrative literature review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 11, p. e105141150057, 2025. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v14i11.50057. Disponível em: https://www.rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/50057. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.