Principlist and Personalist Bioethics: A descriptive analysis and its implications for the discussion on euthanasia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i12.50301Keywords:
Bioethics, Euthanasia, Principlism, Personalism.Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze euthanasia from a bioethical perspective, according to the principlist (Beauchamp Childress) and personalist (Sgreccia) schools of thought. Bioethics examines ethical issues in health and life sciences, addressing dilemmas such as euthanasia. Data were collected from secondary sources, including scientific articles and specialized books. A systematic search was conducted in the SciELO, MEDLINE, BVS, and Lilacs databases, using keywords such as “bioethics,” “principlist bioethics,” “personalist bioethics,” “euthanasia,” and “distanasia.” Initially, this article provides a historical overview of the consolidation of bioethics as a science, highlighting the influence of principlism and its four principles: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice, as well as critiques of this model. Next, the concept of the human person is analyzed to support the implications of the term on personalism and its currents, highlighting the ontologically based bioethics of Elio Sgreccia and its principles: defense of physical life; totality or therapeutic; freedom and responsibility; sociality and subsidiarity. The debate on euthanasia involves a reflection on death, as it can be related to the suffering of serious, chronic, or degenerative diseases, which raises important ethical challenges related to the preservation of human dignity. Finally, the concept of euthanasia is discussed in relation to the bioethical principles of each model and how these can inform and guide the development of a more secure and enriching position on euthanasia.
References
Almeida, R. T. de. (2013). Evolução histórica do conceito de pessoa: enquanto categoria ontológica.Revista Interdisciplinar de Direito, 10(1). https://revistas.faa.edu.br/FDV/article/view/202/167
Antonucci, A. T., Candido, I. P. de S., Rodrigues Neto, A., Schiavini, M., Lehmann, M. F., Sganzerla, A., & Siqueira, J. E. (2023). Morte, diagnóstico e evento. Revista Bioética, 31. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-803420233356pt
Antonucci, A. T., Sganzerla, A., Schiavini, M., Rodrigues Neto, A., Lehmann, M. F., & Siqueira, J. E. (2022). Morte encefálica como problema bioético na formação médica. Revista Bioética, 30, 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422022302524PT
Barbosa, G. S. da S., & Federico, L. (2018). Eutanásia no Brasil: entre o Código Penal e a dignidade da pessoa humana. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 5(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v5i2.52151
Beauchamp, T. L. (2006). The “four principles” approach to health care ethics. Principles of Health Care Ethics, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470510544.ch1
Braus, A. J. (2025). Compassionate principlism: Towards a novel alternative to standard principlism in bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 22(2), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10373-9
Burgos Velasco, J. M. (2013). What is personalistic bioethics? An analysys of its specificity and its theoretical foundations. Cuadernos de Bioetica : Revista Oficial de La Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica Y Etica Medica, 24(80), 17–30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23745815/
Childress, J. F. (1990). The Place of Autonomy in Bioethics. The Hastings Center Report, 20(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3562967
Clouser, K. D., & Gert, B. (1990). A critique of principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/15.2.219
Conti, P. H. B., & Souza, P. V. S. (2021). Bioética e seus paradigmas teóricos. Revista Bioética, 29(4), 716–726. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422021294505
Dale, S. (2023). A Critique of Principlism. Voices in Bioethics, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v9i.10522
Felix, Z. C., Costa, S. F. G. da, Alves, A. M. P. de M., Andrade, C. G. de, Duarte, M. C. S., & Brito, F. M. de. (2013). Eutanásia, distanásia e ortotanásia: revisão integrativa da literatura. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 18, 2733–2746. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000900029
Figueiredo, A. M. (2018). Bioética: Crítica ao principialismo, Constituição brasileira e princípio da dignidade humana. Revista Bioética, 26(4), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422018264267
Gil, A. C. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo Atlas.
Goldim, J. R. (2006). Bioética: Origens e complexidade. Revista HCPA, 26(2), 86–92. https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/164730
Harris, J. (1995). Euthanasia and the value of life. In J. Keown (Ed.), Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives (pp. 6–22). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663444.003
Hoffmann, W. (2019). A bioética personalista como resposta à crise de sentido. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(10), 18941–18948. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv5n10-132.
Holm, S. (1995). Not just autonomy--the principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21(6), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.21.6.332
Kono, M., Arai, N., & Takimoto, Y. (2023). Identifying practical clinical problems in active euthanasia: A systematic literature review of the findings in countries where euthanasia is legal. Palliative and Supportive Care, 21(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951522001699
Machek, D. (2016). Using Our Selves: An Interpretation of the Stoic Four-personae Theory in Cicero’s De Officiis I. Apeiron, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2015-0057
Massimi, M. (2025). A pessoa e o seu conhecimento: algumas etapas significativas de um percurso conceitual. Memorandum: Memória E História Em Psicologia, 18, 10–26. https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/memorandum/article/view/6635
Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free ebook]. Santa Maria. Editora da UFSM. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Ramos, D. L. de P., & Lucato, M. C. (2010). O Conceito De Pessoa Humana Da Bioética Personalista (Personalismo Ontologicamente Fundado). Revista Pistis Praxis, 2(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.7213/pp.v2i1.13505
Revon, G., & J. Reiss, M. (2025). Principlism in Bioethics: How to Consolidate Autonomy? A Scoping Review. Bioethics Open Research, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.12688/bioethopenres.17704.1
Rodríguez-Díaz, A., Marín-Conde, E., & Gómez-Tatay, L. (2025). Personalist Bioethics as a Guide to Assessing Emerging Anti-aging Therapies. The Linacre Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639251361196
Rother, E. T. (2007). Systematic Literature Review X Narrative Review. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2), v–vi. https://www.scielo.br/j/ape/a/z7zZ4Z4GwYV6FR7S9FHTByr/?lang=en
Salvadori, M. (2016). Principialismo e Dworkin: algumas considerações acerca da eutanásia. Aufklärung: Journal of Philosophy, 2(1), 105–134. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4715/471555231005.pdf
Scariot, F. (2016). Questões éticas em pacientes terminais segundo o personalismo ontológico de Elio Sgreccia [Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade de Caxias do Sul]. https://repositorio.ucs.br/handle/11338/1186
Sgreccia, E. (2016). Manual de bioética: Fundamentos e ética biomédica (5a ed.). Edições Loyola.
Sgreccia, E. (2013). Persona Humana Y Personalismo. Cuadernos de Bioética, XXIV(1), 115–123. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=87527461012
Siqueira-Batista, R., & Schramm, F. R. (2004). Eutanásia: pelas veredas da morte e da autonomia. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 9(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-81232004000100004
Soares, F. J. P., Garrafa, V., Santos, J. L. da S., & Santos, R. V. dos. (2024). Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics from the perspective of principlist bioethics. Revista Bioética, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-803420243585en
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Donizete Júnior Rodrigues, Franco Scariot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
